Free: Contests & Raffles.
There were several recourse officers around the whole time to monitor anything to do with fish habitat and or wetlands.
I think that's the greenies' plan, have it all burn. If the Forest Circus is hamstrung eventually insurance rates will skyrocket, banks won't loan, people won't build in the forest. Then they just need fires to remove the existing structures. Be too much red tape and cost prohibitive to rebuild, so residents head to the city and the commies get to take over more land for parks.
Quote from: UBA on August 22, 2016, 10:34:02 AMThere were several recourse officers around the whole time to monitor anything to do with fish habitat and or wetlands.Over the past few years I've started to learn a lot more about wildland firefighting. I used to think the firefighters could go out and basically do anything in terms of cutting trees down to prevent spread. I now know that most fires now have Resource Advisors who go out and say cut this tree and not this one, there's an archaeological site here, etc. And the fire management people have to follow these orders.So realistically if the group wants to blame someone blame those resource advisors who apparently had no problem with the actions taken on this fire.
Right or wrong, i'm just that for once somebody in the forest service had the nuts to make a decision and stick to it. very very rare these days