collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Numbers Down?!?!?!  (Read 6526 times)

Offline remington300mag

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 727
  • Location: Cashmere
Numbers Down?!?!?!
« on: February 20, 2009, 02:13:56 PM »
So, I just got done reading a post by another member that had this attachment to it, it says that the bear population in Washington State is on the decline! What the hell??? How many of you out there truly believe that the Black Bear population in Washington state is on the decline???? Is that why they are giving out more spring permits??? I believe that since they closed down baiting and hound hunting, the bear population in this state has done nothing less than explode! I see more bear, bigger bear, and more bear sign in one day out in the woods now than I ever did as a kid!

Anyway, read this and let me know if I read it right!! As far as I can tell, WDFW is just trying to cover up another stupid decision on there part!!!

http://wdfw.wa.gov/wlm/game/seasonsetting/2009-2011_recommendations/bear_&_cougr_general_seasons_232-28-272_287.pdf
"It's not how hard you hit that matters....It's how hard you can get hit and keep coming forward!"

Offline ThePascoKid

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 734
  • Location: Tri-Cities
Re: Numbers Down?!?!?!
« Reply #1 on: February 20, 2009, 02:25:45 PM »
I'm with you I don't believe for one second that bear numbers are on the decline.
You old sailor you, you motor boatin' son of a bitch

Offline WDFW-SUX

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5724
Re: Numbers Down?!?!?!
« Reply #2 on: February 20, 2009, 02:28:30 PM »
I can actually believe it..........more people are just shooting and don't care if they are killing sows. If we could bait it would not be an issue.

I don't think WDFW has any clue on the actuall bear numbers though
THE WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUCKS MORE THAN EVER..........

Offline Machias

  • Trapper
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 18929
  • Location: Worley, ID
Re: Numbers Down?!?!?!
« Reply #3 on: February 20, 2009, 04:23:10 PM »
Harvest of sows is up, wounding rates are WAY up.  You eliminate the two best harvest methods as far as selection goes and yes it can have a impact on the numbers.  Look at all the photos last year of some ridiculously small bears being posted here.  If folks had time to size up their bears on a bait or up a tree alot less sows and cubs would be getting harvested.   :twocents:

We told the WDFW that this would happen, it was one of the arugments used during the so called debate back in 1995/96.
Fred Moyer

When it's Grim, be the GRIM REAPER!

Offline RubblesPH

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 322
  • Location: Tri-Cities
Re: Numbers Down?!?!?!
« Reply #4 on: February 20, 2009, 04:27:57 PM »
There was an initiative to get the bear baiting back....I think about six months ago I saw something about it.  Anyone know what ever became of that? 

Offline luvtohnt

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 1438
  • Location: Ellensburg
Re: Numbers Down?!?!?!
« Reply #5 on: February 20, 2009, 04:30:47 PM »
I wish there were more studies available that showed the harvest reports on post ban (hound and bait ban) hunting of bears and cats. Maybe if there was the ban would have never happened. Bears and cats climbed in population for about 5 or 6 years after the ban and now because of open hunting methods the numbers of both are starting to fall. This could be the beggining of something bad if some poeple (WDFW) don't pull thier heads out. It happens alot when people get wind that hunters are making the numbers fall, they imidiatly try to ban the hunting of said animal.

Brandon

Offline ThePascoKid

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 734
  • Location: Tri-Cities
Re: Numbers Down?!?!?!
« Reply #6 on: February 20, 2009, 05:06:16 PM »
I only hunt the blues so my view is a little skewd but I'll be damned if the bear numbers are down there, every year I see more and more but I can't speak to the rest of the state
You old sailor you, you motor boatin' son of a bitch

Offline rasbo

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 20144
  • Location: Grant county
  • In God I trust...Try taking that away from me!
Re: Numbers Down?!?!?!
« Reply #7 on: February 21, 2009, 06:57:55 AM »
I dont believe they are down where I hunt,the girdling seems to be way up.

Offline PWN Kurt

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 186
  • Location: Vancouver, WA
Re: Numbers Down?!?!?!
« Reply #8 on: February 21, 2009, 11:54:00 AM »
I'd like to see the harvest reports for 2008...I don't think they are up yet.

My understanding is that the bear complaints (getting into bird feeders, garbage, bbqs) were at an all time high last year.  They say that some of that was due to snow lingering in the high country last spring...but I'm sure its also a sign that numbers are good.

Offline STIKNSTRINGBOW

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 4366
  • Location: Chehalis
    • https://www.facebook.com/stiknstring.bow
Re: Numbers Down?!?!?!
« Reply #9 on: February 21, 2009, 01:59:39 PM »
My cousins in Poulsbo have them eating out of birdfeeders in their front yard, my hunting group saw 6 last elk season in the Manastash, the only place I think that they are in decline is in the areas open during spring hunts and the only places the Biologists are willing to walk.
The mountains are calling and I must go."
- John Muir
"I go to nature to be soothed and healed, and to have my senses put in order."
- John Burroughs
NASP Certified Basic Archery Instructor
NASP Certified Basic Archery Instructor Trainer

Offline billythekidrock

  • Varmint
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 13440
Re: Numbers Down?!?!?!
« Reply #10 on: February 21, 2009, 02:27:48 PM »
I wish there were more studies available that showed the harvest reports on post ban (hound and bait ban) hunting of bears and cats. Maybe if there was the ban would have never happened. Bears and cats climbed in population for about 5 or 6 years after the ban and now because of open hunting methods the numbers of both are starting to fall.

The numbers were on the rise before the ban. The population boom would have happened with or without the ban. When the breeding base gets so large the population grows exponentially.

For nearly ten years before the ban we were killing about 800 bears a year. For the first ten years since the ban we are killing 1500 bears a year. Mostly in due to cheap/free bear tags that are now in everyone's pocket.

Are they on the decline? I don't know and I doubt F&W knows for sure.




Offline Abolt338

  • Volunteer Wild Animal Population Control Specialist
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 151
  • Location: Cashmere, WA / Los Angeles, CA
Re: Numbers Down?!?!?!
« Reply #11 on: March 10, 2009, 03:31:08 PM »
We also have to take into account that the bear population in WA is not one unique body.  Prior to the bans, pressure on the western populations was higher.  People could effectively hunt bears in the western timber using bait and hounds.  After the ban, regulation changes - cheaper tags, more liberal limits, longer seasons - switched the bear hunting pressure to the more open country East of the mountains. 

Statewide harvest rates eventually returned to their pre-ban levels, but a disproportionate number bears are being taken East of the Cascades as incidental harvests by deer / elk hunters who would otherwise not have purchased a bear tag.

As a result, populations West of the mountains (and those with heavy timber) are booming.  Populations in more open terrain are taking a bit of a hit, though I don't think it's a major decline.

Speaking with WA bear Biologists, there's no concrete way to measure bear populations.  Their estimates are guesses at best based on estimated sow mortality, hunter reports, estimated cub survival data, etc.

If you want to know whether or not bear populations are hurting on the West side (where nearly 2/3 of the state bear population resides), ask the timber companies.

Lacking the ability to bait and use hounds is not ideal for hunters or bear populations, but neither are hurting to the point where one would suggest a further reduction in hunting opportunity.

RW
« Last Edit: March 10, 2009, 07:35:24 PM by Abolt338 »
There's no place like the middle of nowhere!!!

Offline 7mag.

  • Blacktail Hunter
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 2968
  • Location: Buckley
  • YAR member
Re: Numbers Down?!?!?!
« Reply #12 on: March 10, 2009, 04:55:07 PM »
We also have to take into account that the bear population in WA is not one unique body.  Prior to the bans, pressures on the western populations was higher.  People could effectively hunt bears in the western timber using bait and hounds.  After the ban, regulation changes - cheaper tags, more liberal limits, longer seasons - switched the bear hunting pressure to the more open country East of the mountains. 

Statewide harvest rates eventually returned to their pre-ban levels, but a disproportionate number bears are being taken East of the Cascades as incidental harvests by deer / elk hunters who would otherwise not purchased a bear tag.

As a result, populations West of the mountains (and those with heavy timber) are booming.  Populations in more open terrain are taking a bit of a hit, though I don't think it's a major decline.

Speaking with WA bear Biologists, there's no concrete way to measure bear populations.  They're estimates are guesses at best based on estimated sow mortality, hunter reports, estimated cub survival data, etc.

If you want to know whether or not bear populations are hurting on the West side (where nearly 2/3 of the state bear population resides), ask the timber companies.

Lacking the ability to bait and use hounds is not ideal for hunters or bear populations, but neither are hurting to the point where one would suggest a further reduction in hunting opportunity.

RW


Good info. I have no information to back myself up, but through my own observations, bear numbers seem to be up over the last several years. I have seen more bears and sign than ever as a kid (pre ban).
Semper Fi. USMC

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32892
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Numbers Down?!?!?!
« Reply #13 on: March 10, 2009, 04:58:18 PM »
Based on my own observations I don't see a decline
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline billythekidrock

  • Varmint
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 13440
Re: Numbers Down?!?!?!
« Reply #14 on: March 10, 2009, 06:32:49 PM »
Quote
Statewide harvest rates eventually returned to their pre-ban levels,

In over ten years it has not returned to preban levels. We are killing nearly 1/3 more now then when we could use dogs and bait.




 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Bow mount trolling motors by Ironhead
[Today at 07:30:08 PM]


A question for any FFL holders on here by dreadi
[Today at 07:28:54 PM]


Best/Preferred Scouting App by MuleyTracksWA
[Today at 06:59:55 PM]


Riffe Lake by MADMAX
[Today at 06:37:42 PM]


KODIAK06 2025 trail cam and personal pics thread by kodiak06
[Today at 06:34:08 PM]


Wolf documentary PBS by Fidelk
[Today at 06:17:50 PM]


Archery Elk Advice by blackveltbowhunter
[Today at 06:14:31 PM]


Share your out of state experience by Crunchy
[Today at 05:50:36 PM]


Montana Breaks Elk by Magnum_Willys
[Today at 05:45:34 PM]


MA-10 Coho by metlhead
[Today at 03:32:38 PM]


Oregon special tag info by robescc
[Today at 02:17:07 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal