Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: Happy Gilmore on April 04, 2017, 09:47:09 PM$10k later..... Lol. That alone is twice all the total maintenance I've spent on my Ford since 2006 when I bought it. And all the tuners ect will make more costs in the ling run accelerating the wear on all rolling parts on the truck. I'd never buy a modified truck. Bearings, ball joints, gears, u joints etc all go out faster with big tires and more power. There is always a sacrifice no matter what folks claim on fuel economy. Bigger tires and more power equal more stress on everything which equals premature failure. I'd say half life if you're lucky nice engine.... Everything else is shot just past 150k.Yea, but your trucks don't have all the emissions crap the newer ones have for one. Second, it doesn't cost 10k to delete and tune a truck. More like 1-2k largely depending on the tuner. My buddy just had to have the egr replaced on his '11 f350 to the tune of $2k. Longevity also depends on what tune you run. If your running a performance tune, absolutely it's gonna take its toll on the internals. I'd argue that a stock or fuel mileage tune does nothing to decrease longevity. Just reduces having to replace dpf and egr down the road.
$10k later..... Lol. That alone is twice all the total maintenance I've spent on my Ford since 2006 when I bought it. And all the tuners ect will make more costs in the ling run accelerating the wear on all rolling parts on the truck. I'd never buy a modified truck. Bearings, ball joints, gears, u joints etc all go out faster with big tires and more power. There is always a sacrifice no matter what folks claim on fuel economy. Bigger tires and more power equal more stress on everything which equals premature failure. I'd say half life if you're lucky nice engine.... Everything else is shot just past 150k.
Quote from: huntnphool on April 05, 2017, 10:38:13 AMQuote from: Mudman on April 05, 2017, 10:22:18 AM7.3 fuel system is inferior. Auto trans are not good. Loud. 33% more parts to break. mpg is less than 5.9 cummins. Power is less. That said they are good and rate # 2 from me. 5.9 cummins is the best period. No contest here. I've never touched my fuel system, rebuilt the transmission at 400k because I thought it was slipping, turned out to be a oil pressure sensor, still pulls my loaded 22' boat over the pass on cruise at 75mph without kicking down and continues to get 18 mpg daily driving........all while approaching half a million miles! YMMV That is remarkable! I did say #2. I love em but love cummins much more. 200k ready for 4th trans, sensors(cam etc) injector harness, glow plugs, relays, injectors, fuel sytem/bowl issues, Ball joints, u joints, so I didn't have great luck. I did love the truck though!
Quote from: Mudman on April 05, 2017, 10:22:18 AM7.3 fuel system is inferior. Auto trans are not good. Loud. 33% more parts to break. mpg is less than 5.9 cummins. Power is less. That said they are good and rate # 2 from me. 5.9 cummins is the best period. No contest here. I've never touched my fuel system, rebuilt the transmission at 400k because I thought it was slipping, turned out to be a oil pressure sensor, still pulls my loaded 22' boat over the pass on cruise at 75mph without kicking down and continues to get 18 mpg daily driving........all while approaching half a million miles! YMMV
7.3 fuel system is inferior. Auto trans are not good. Loud. 33% more parts to break. mpg is less than 5.9 cummins. Power is less. That said they are good and rate # 2 from me. 5.9 cummins is the best period. No contest here.
Quote from: spoonman on April 04, 2017, 09:16:48 AMI have owned a 2002 7.3 powerstroke and now own a 2007 5.9 cummins. The 7.3 was a great power plant and was pretty reliable other than the cam pos sensor going out a couple times. I now have a 2007 mega cab 5.9 with 150k on it and have had zero issues so far. The power is a bit different in the 5.9 as it definitely feels to have more low end torque than the 7.3 but that's just my experience. I am getting great fuel economy out of my 5.9 and have found nothing to complain about at this point. I don't think you can go wrong with a 01 or 02 7.3 or a 06-07 5.9 cummins, both very stout power plants.Just a heads up on these comments. Mid-model year 2007 switched to the 6.7L Cummins with all the emissions crap on it. Those things were constant problems. By all means, if you find a good '07 Ram go for it, just make sure it's the 5.9L. It's kind of become a bit of a unicorn.
I have owned a 2002 7.3 powerstroke and now own a 2007 5.9 cummins. The 7.3 was a great power plant and was pretty reliable other than the cam pos sensor going out a couple times. I now have a 2007 mega cab 5.9 with 150k on it and have had zero issues so far. The power is a bit different in the 5.9 as it definitely feels to have more low end torque than the 7.3 but that's just my experience. I am getting great fuel economy out of my 5.9 and have found nothing to complain about at this point. I don't think you can go wrong with a 01 or 02 7.3 or a 06-07 5.9 cummins, both very stout power plants.
I'd have to put another vote in for the Ford 1999 to 2003 7.3 models. I've had one with a six spd shaker stick forever. I pull a 23' walkaround all over the west coast year round. It's been extremely dependable and gets great mileage.
First diesel I had was a used '88 Ford naturally aspirated 7.3 snail. Second one was a used '97 7.3 power stroke. Both Fords were autos and the '97 had some slippage. The '97 also had a high altitude starting problem, I probably would have figured it out if I hadn't hit an elk on I-90 going 70. Both Fords were totaled.Third I had an brand new '09 dodge 2500 diesel 6 spd, every 18 months had to take it in for a egr cooler grid cleanout (or something like that); had one of the u-joints on the front axle start to lock up, felt like I was in 4x when I was turning when I wasn't; last straw, the windshield started to leak. After three years traded it in for an '02 Dodge with a 5.9 that was a great truck for five years (also totaled). I'm now looking at getting a '05 Dodge. The 5.9 long beds with decent mileage are very hard to find!
Quote from: whacker1 on April 05, 2017, 02:08:45 PMthere was an 2006 duramax with 150k miles on here in the last 60 days if you go looking that would be a good choice to explore for $22k. don't know if it is gone, but worth looking back through the thread.edit. took me a few minutest to find it, but this was the link I was referring to. based on what you described, I think this would be a good option if it fits your budget.http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,209930.0.htmlAppreciate the "google fu" Whacker, I'll give that fella a call. Good stuff folks, this is what I've been looking for, a simple what you liked and didn't like and why. Appreciate all the help.
there was an 2006 duramax with 150k miles on here in the last 60 days if you go looking that would be a good choice to explore for $22k. don't know if it is gone, but worth looking back through the thread.edit. took me a few minutest to find it, but this was the link I was referring to. based on what you described, I think this would be a good option if it fits your budget.http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,209930.0.html