collapse

Advertisement


Poll

Should Quality Buck & Bull tags go OIL?

No
161 (85.6%)
Yes
27 (14.4%)

Total Members Voted: 188

Author Topic: Should Quality Buck & Bull tags go OIL?  (Read 28914 times)

Offline Jpmiller

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2016
  • Posts: 4056
  • Location: Martin, ND
Re: Should Quality Buck & Bull tags go OIL?
« Reply #105 on: June 22, 2017, 07:18:09 AM »
As someone who could afford to front the tag fees for oil tags I still don't like it. Why do you want to price someone out of the sport? Wanting to hunt a oil tag but not having the same "passion" as someone else shouldn't disqualify you.

Offline ctwiggs1

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 4221
Re: Should Quality Buck & Bull tags go OIL?
« Reply #106 on: June 22, 2017, 07:21:55 AM »
Wanting to hunt a oil tag but not having the same "passion" as someone else shouldn't disqualify you.
:yeah:

I don't mind doing it to nonresidents, but to expect a resident to front $1,000 to apply for the OIL tags for animals that are in their state is a bit much.

We shouldn't be trying to eliminate hunting opportunity. 

Offline huntnnw

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9635
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Should Quality Buck & Bull tags go OIL?
« Reply #107 on: June 22, 2017, 07:58:57 AM »
Gotta front in a lot of states. Not just oil , but deer and elk

Offline Jpmiller

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2016
  • Posts: 4056
  • Location: Martin, ND
Re: Should Quality Buck & Bull tags go OIL?
« Reply #108 on: June 22, 2017, 10:50:05 AM »
Gotta front in a lot of states. Not just oil , but deer and elk

But why is trying to price hunters out of opportunities the way you want to go? Why limit the chances for everyone? What makes my chances of drawing a tag any more important than someone else's chances?

Offline ctwiggs1

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 4221
Re: Should Quality Buck & Bull tags go OIL?
« Reply #109 on: June 22, 2017, 11:11:23 AM »
@jpmiller

 :tup:

Offline SkookumHntr

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 2900
  • Location: Tono, WA
Re: Should Quality Buck & Bull tags go OIL?
« Reply #110 on: June 22, 2017, 11:35:02 AM »
Gotta front in a lot of states. Not just oil , but deer and elk

But why is trying to price hunters out of opportunities the way you want to go? Why limit the chances for everyone? What makes my chances of drawing a tag any more important than someone else's chances?
:bash:
IBEW89 RMEF MDF CCA

Offline Biggerhammer

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 5142
  • Location: Central Washington
  • Powder, primer, bullet JUNKIE.
Re: Should Quality Buck & Bull tags go OIL?
« Reply #111 on: June 24, 2017, 05:19:33 PM »
WoW! Some people really need to rethink their thought process.

Brilliant! Let's put more restrictions on a already restricted system.


Offline Jimmy33

  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2012
  • Posts: 805
Re: Should Quality Buck & Bull tags go OIL?
« Reply #112 on: June 25, 2017, 09:37:15 AM »
There's not a single buck or bull tag in WA worth that designation . Some states do have tags like this such as Henry mts Utah. There are LOTS of options in this state to increase draw odds and they have done absolutely nothing about it EVER! If it means less money they don't wanna hear it.
My point exactly...the reason that there are so many differing opinions for the way Washington should be managed is because there are so many different levels of what people perceive as good quality Hunts and the amount of money and time people are willing to put up with to get those hunts. If I didn't live here and have been stupidly hoarding points over 14 years for perceived "great" hunts then this would not be a state worth saving points for. The best tags this state has to offer are general season OTC tags. We as Washington hunters are feeding WDFWs fire when it comes to this system. We won't do anything about it. I think it's pretty simple. We have option 1 that says we go down to one choice per category. I hate this option but I'm afraid it's all they may actually agree too. Or option 2 get rid of everything and go to idahos system. I also think that if you draw a tag, you should only be able to hunt that season, not a general tag. In short, there are no OIL elk or deer tags in this state. OTC mule deer and elk in other states are equal to our 1% draw odd tags...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
“The Lord is my rock, my fortress and my deliverer;my God is my rock, in whom I take refuge, my shield and the horn of my salvation.
He is my stronghold, my refuge and my savior—
    from violent people you save me.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

GMU 247 Entiat bear hunting by BigredRusch
[Today at 11:15:06 AM]


3 days for Kings by 3nails
[Today at 11:15:05 AM]


Sockeye Numbers by buglebuster
[Today at 10:28:52 AM]


Best all around muzzy (updated) by CamoDup
[Today at 09:41:58 AM]


AUCTION: SE Idaho DIY Deer or Deer/Elk Hunt by Dan-o
[Today at 09:13:29 AM]


Full moon and last week of September by vandeman17
[Today at 08:49:49 AM]


2025 Montana alternate list by CaNINE
[Today at 05:52:10 AM]


2025 Crab! by spin05
[Today at 05:11:11 AM]


Lynx kittens confirmed in the Kettle Range by WapitiTalk1
[Yesterday at 11:21:59 PM]


Cowiche Quality Buck by buglebuster
[Yesterday at 10:29:26 PM]


50 inch SXS and Tracks? by bearpaw
[Yesterday at 08:08:34 PM]


Accura MR-X 45 load development by kyles_88
[Yesterday at 08:03:44 PM]


Oregon special tag info by Judespapa
[Yesterday at 12:24:57 PM]


wings wings and more wings! by birddogdad
[Yesterday at 11:27:43 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal