collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Nipple exposed to the elements  (Read 6414 times)

Offline Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 13160
  • Location: Arlington
Re: Nipple exposed to the elements
« Reply #15 on: September 24, 2017, 03:52:01 PM »
I quoted a state official as well.  Actually, there were two wardens there and the discussion was around the same thing mentioned above.  The WAC should be updated as everyone agreed that it was hard to apply in situations like tape or flaps of leather which are both common.

Their argument went back to the spirit of the law which was that the primer was exposed to the weather.  When you wrap it in saran wrap, it is no more exposed to the weather than a closed system.

If you have it tucked under your arm, it is still exposed.

On the flip side, you could drill a tiny hole in a closed system and it would then be "exposed."  The law was poorly written and likely there are various interpretations around there.

I have no marbles in the game, just letting people know there are different views on the topic.
« Last Edit: September 24, 2017, 04:03:57 PM by Stein »

Offline Sabotloader

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 2309
  • Location: Idaho, Northern
Re: Nipple exposed to the elements
« Reply #16 on: September 24, 2017, 04:15:47 PM »
All three PacNorWest States have the same rule and all three interpret the rule as a part 'Integral' to the rifle. Man weather-proofing black powder rifles for hunting - it is as old as time.

Believe me this has been discussed in all three states at the highest level.


Keep shooting muzzleloaders - They are a blast!!

Offline Dan-o

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2010
  • Posts: 18446
Re: Nipple exposed to the elements
« Reply #17 on: September 24, 2017, 05:40:30 PM »
Agreed.

I've hunted Muzzy in this state for over 30 years.    I routinely tape the muzzle and cover the nipple...... I've been checked many times.  Never an issue.
Member:   Yakstrakgutp (or whatever we are)
I love the BFRO!!!
I wonder how many people will touch their nose to their screen trying to read this...

Offline ctwiggs1

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 4224
Re: Nipple exposed to the elements
« Reply #18 on: September 25, 2017, 07:47:34 AM »
What's funny is that when I e-mailed WDFW, and explained exactly what it was that I would be doing, they told me it was illegal. 

"Thank you for contacting WDFW. As the other part of the regulation states it must be visible and exposed to the weather. So according to one of our sergeants and one of our officers, the things that you refer to would render them not visible and also no longer exposed to the elements. So, the answer to your question is no, you may not cover it with a “gun condom” or a piece of duct tape.

They're absolutely wrong, based on the WAC. That being said, you may have to take a ticket to court to prove it.

Offline ctwiggs1

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 4224
Re: Nipple exposed to the elements
« Reply #19 on: September 25, 2017, 07:52:16 AM »
I quoted a state official as well.  Actually, there were two wardens there and the discussion was around the same thing mentioned above.  The WAC should be updated as everyone agreed that it was hard to apply in situations like tape or flaps of leather which are both common.

Their argument went back to the spirit of the law which was that the primer was exposed to the weather.  When you wrap it in saran wrap, it is no more exposed to the weather than a closed system.

If you have it tucked under your arm, it is still exposed.

On the flip side, you could drill a tiny hole in a closed system and it would then be "exposed."  The law was poorly written and likely there are various interpretations around there.

I have no marbles in the game, just letting people know there are different views on the topic.

That's definitely not the spirit of the said law.  The spirit of the law is to use lower-tech weapons for the muzzleloader season.  They're trying to eliminate modern primers and telescopic sights.  If they wanted the nipple to be exposed PERIOD, they could easily have said "The nipple must always be exposed to the elements". 

I mean seriously, does anybody really think Daniel Boone went around with the nipple exposed??

Offline birddogdad

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2014
  • Posts: 2009
  • Location: WA
  • Groups: LMAC, NRA
Re: Nipple exposed to the elements
« Reply #20 on: September 25, 2017, 08:16:04 AM »
clear as mud!
USN retired
1981-2011

Offline ctwiggs1

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 4224
Re: Nipple exposed to the elements
« Reply #21 on: September 25, 2017, 08:17:38 AM »
Honestly I do think the law is pretty clear.

I think the game wardens who misinterpret it probably just aren't very familiar with muzzleloaders. 

Offline reelamin

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Apr 2017
  • Posts: 120
Re: Nipple exposed to the elements
« Reply #22 on: September 25, 2017, 11:31:56 AM »
The game warden at my son’s hunter ed class said he would ticked taped smoke poles.  They have to be open.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If he did ticket someone he would be 100% wrong.   You can cover up the breach area if you want! 

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21855
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Nipple exposed to the elements
« Reply #23 on: September 25, 2017, 11:47:14 AM »
The confusion comes from the WAC having two requirements: the cap must (1) "be visible", and (2) not "capable of being enclosed by an integral part of the weapon proper".

I don't agree but I could understand a nitpicking officer (and judge) arguing that opaque tape which makes the cap not visible violates the first requirement. Clear saran wrap couldn't be considered in violation of the first requirement or the second.

"Exposed to the weather" means the percussion cap or the frizzen must be visible and not capable of being enclosed by an integral part of the weapon proper."
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

MT B tag by Dan-o
[Today at 12:09:37 AM]


Idaho unit 10A by Pnwrider
[Yesterday at 11:42:18 PM]


New scope or not? by Angus
[Yesterday at 10:56:22 PM]


What gmu's in sw Washington hold elk? by Kc_Kracker
[Yesterday at 10:00:40 PM]


2025 Quality Chewuch Tag by huntnphool
[Yesterday at 09:59:31 PM]


2025 Canning by Twispriver
[Yesterday at 09:24:02 PM]


Huck 121 Youth Elk by Parkern
[Yesterday at 07:50:13 PM]


Smith-Reynolds American Legion Post #14 Fall Raffle by pianoman9701
[Yesterday at 07:49:13 PM]


Drew A Bull Moose Tag - 49 Degrees North A, Late hunt NOV 1st- NOV 30th by Jimmer
[Yesterday at 07:45:11 PM]


Two stories for you (no deer were harmed in the making) by 3boys
[Yesterday at 06:54:14 PM]


Quality deer hunt by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 05:57:43 PM]


Willipa Hills Antlerless tag by GOcougsHunter
[Yesterday at 05:35:58 PM]


Going to try my hand at calling. by craigapphunt
[Yesterday at 05:24:50 PM]


Share your out of state experience by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 04:45:31 PM]


Fishin' with First-Timers by HntnFsh
[Yesterday at 04:16:36 PM]


Any buck clarification by Rugergunsite308
[Yesterday at 04:04:47 PM]


More than one shotgun? by goldenhtr
[Yesterday at 03:29:15 PM]


Moose's 2025 Upland Season by bighorns2bushytails
[Yesterday at 01:29:56 PM]


How do you scout for small game? by ghosthunter
[Yesterday at 01:15:23 PM]


Opening Day Ducks - Why Surface Drives by Delta Duckman
[Yesterday at 12:11:55 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal