collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Nipple exposed to the elements  (Read 6491 times)

Offline Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 13193
  • Location: Arlington
Re: Nipple exposed to the elements
« Reply #15 on: September 24, 2017, 03:52:01 PM »
I quoted a state official as well.  Actually, there were two wardens there and the discussion was around the same thing mentioned above.  The WAC should be updated as everyone agreed that it was hard to apply in situations like tape or flaps of leather which are both common.

Their argument went back to the spirit of the law which was that the primer was exposed to the weather.  When you wrap it in saran wrap, it is no more exposed to the weather than a closed system.

If you have it tucked under your arm, it is still exposed.

On the flip side, you could drill a tiny hole in a closed system and it would then be "exposed."  The law was poorly written and likely there are various interpretations around there.

I have no marbles in the game, just letting people know there are different views on the topic.
« Last Edit: September 24, 2017, 04:03:57 PM by Stein »

Offline Sabotloader

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 2309
  • Location: Idaho, Northern
Re: Nipple exposed to the elements
« Reply #16 on: September 24, 2017, 04:15:47 PM »
All three PacNorWest States have the same rule and all three interpret the rule as a part 'Integral' to the rifle. Man weather-proofing black powder rifles for hunting - it is as old as time.

Believe me this has been discussed in all three states at the highest level.


Keep shooting muzzleloaders - They are a blast!!

Offline Dan-o

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2010
  • Posts: 18473
Re: Nipple exposed to the elements
« Reply #17 on: September 24, 2017, 05:40:30 PM »
Agreed.

I've hunted Muzzy in this state for over 30 years.    I routinely tape the muzzle and cover the nipple...... I've been checked many times.  Never an issue.
Member:   Yakstrakgutp (or whatever we are)
I love the BFRO!!!
I wonder how many people will touch their nose to their screen trying to read this...

Offline ctwiggs1

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 4231
Re: Nipple exposed to the elements
« Reply #18 on: September 25, 2017, 07:47:34 AM »
What's funny is that when I e-mailed WDFW, and explained exactly what it was that I would be doing, they told me it was illegal. 

"Thank you for contacting WDFW. As the other part of the regulation states it must be visible and exposed to the weather. So according to one of our sergeants and one of our officers, the things that you refer to would render them not visible and also no longer exposed to the elements. So, the answer to your question is no, you may not cover it with a “gun condom” or a piece of duct tape.

They're absolutely wrong, based on the WAC. That being said, you may have to take a ticket to court to prove it.

Offline ctwiggs1

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 4231
Re: Nipple exposed to the elements
« Reply #19 on: September 25, 2017, 07:52:16 AM »
I quoted a state official as well.  Actually, there were two wardens there and the discussion was around the same thing mentioned above.  The WAC should be updated as everyone agreed that it was hard to apply in situations like tape or flaps of leather which are both common.

Their argument went back to the spirit of the law which was that the primer was exposed to the weather.  When you wrap it in saran wrap, it is no more exposed to the weather than a closed system.

If you have it tucked under your arm, it is still exposed.

On the flip side, you could drill a tiny hole in a closed system and it would then be "exposed."  The law was poorly written and likely there are various interpretations around there.

I have no marbles in the game, just letting people know there are different views on the topic.

That's definitely not the spirit of the said law.  The spirit of the law is to use lower-tech weapons for the muzzleloader season.  They're trying to eliminate modern primers and telescopic sights.  If they wanted the nipple to be exposed PERIOD, they could easily have said "The nipple must always be exposed to the elements". 

I mean seriously, does anybody really think Daniel Boone went around with the nipple exposed??

Offline birddogdad

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2014
  • Posts: 2010
  • Location: WA
  • Groups: LMAC, NRA
Re: Nipple exposed to the elements
« Reply #20 on: September 25, 2017, 08:16:04 AM »
clear as mud!
USN retired
1981-2011

Offline ctwiggs1

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 4231
Re: Nipple exposed to the elements
« Reply #21 on: September 25, 2017, 08:17:38 AM »
Honestly I do think the law is pretty clear.

I think the game wardens who misinterpret it probably just aren't very familiar with muzzleloaders. 

Offline reelamin

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Apr 2017
  • Posts: 120
Re: Nipple exposed to the elements
« Reply #22 on: September 25, 2017, 11:31:56 AM »
The game warden at my son’s hunter ed class said he would ticked taped smoke poles.  They have to be open.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If he did ticket someone he would be 100% wrong.   You can cover up the breach area if you want! 

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21866
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Nipple exposed to the elements
« Reply #23 on: September 25, 2017, 11:47:14 AM »
The confusion comes from the WAC having two requirements: the cap must (1) "be visible", and (2) not "capable of being enclosed by an integral part of the weapon proper".

I don't agree but I could understand a nitpicking officer (and judge) arguing that opaque tape which makes the cap not visible violates the first requirement. Clear saran wrap couldn't be considered in violation of the first requirement or the second.

"Exposed to the weather" means the percussion cap or the frizzen must be visible and not capable of being enclosed by an integral part of the weapon proper."
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

WA Bucket List….Mule Deer Permit by teanawayslayer
[Today at 04:58:20 AM]


Found after 2 days, meat worth anything? by C-Money
[Today at 04:06:56 AM]


Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn! by HillHound
[Today at 02:41:02 AM]


Aquapod/Sneak boat by h2ofowlr
[Yesterday at 10:23:28 PM]


GO 2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 10:03:02 PM]


Blackstone newbie by Blacklab
[Yesterday at 09:08:18 PM]


Is it a conflict of interest by bbarnes
[Yesterday at 08:47:22 PM]


2025 elk success thread!! by Pete112288
[Yesterday at 06:50:30 PM]


Trap Check Time by Barehunter
[Yesterday at 06:39:25 PM]


Cell Cams for Westside Elk by Wet Chicken
[Yesterday at 05:23:04 PM]


Seekins PH3 by Hitsman3
[Yesterday at 05:06:39 PM]


Wildlife Obsession Duvall WA Taxidermy Closing its doors by Caseyd
[Yesterday at 12:24:36 PM]


Late Achery Hunt 💥VIDEO💥 by oldschool
[Yesterday at 11:43:19 AM]


The first Moose tags. by Pathfinder101
[Yesterday at 10:56:48 AM]


Hunting Exotics in Texas by jstone
[Yesterday at 10:53:06 AM]


New bow ideas by Dreaded Archer24
[Yesterday at 09:56:06 AM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by luvmystang67
[Yesterday at 09:48:24 AM]


Rut Buddies by ballpark
[Yesterday at 09:44:24 AM]


AKC Australian Shepherd Puppies by TeacherMan
[Yesterday at 09:22:02 AM]


Smith-Reynolds American Legion Post #14 Fall Raffle by pianoman9701
[Yesterday at 08:22:40 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal