Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: jackelope on May 01, 2018, 10:43:28 AMQuote from: Special T on May 01, 2018, 10:29:26 AMQuote from: Cougartail on May 01, 2018, 09:56:13 AMQuote from: pianoman9701 on May 01, 2018, 07:45:26 AMQuote from: jackmaster on May 01, 2018, 06:38:17 AMCougartail, wasn't Idahos numbers declining so fast that your state was losing out of state hunters and their money so your govenor declared war on wolves? Isn't that when the numbers in idaho stabalized ? If I remember corectly the moose and elk numbers were in big trouble I'm sure it was just cougars and bears. You've been reading propaganda again, haven't you JM? You guys are so smart.. First off, with all the wolf hating windbags on the internet why has Idaho never filled their wolf harvest quota? Typing is easier than leaving the comfort of your home and truck? Now for a history lesson.. Prior to the late 90s in Idaho the Lion harvest was on average 800 to 900 cats per year. After 1998 the average has been 400 to 500 cats per year. During the post 1998 era they added 1000 wolves roughly. Now, how many cats were added in that 20 years of reduced lion harvest, on average of 400 per year? (1998 to 2018)Simplistic explanations of complex population dynamics come from simple minds.. Do wolves reduce dear & elk populations, yes. Are they the largest contributor to the problem in Washington.. not even close. In Idaho, more so but still not the major cause of the decline.Now grab your red capes and baskets and head over to grandma's house... it will be ok.. I promise!!!! From your statement then the lack of harvest of all predators has contributed to the decline. As such they all need more management.As usual us sportsmen are arguing the details and ignoring the broad facts.The issue needs to be how do we in crease harvest of all predators in the areas most effected.?Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using TapatalkThank God someone sees it. The overall problem is really obvious to me. It's not JUST wolves. If you think it is, you've got blinders on.JM, I don't think you've been following the discussion closely. I personally haven't said it's just wolves, but I have said we already had a predator problem in WA because of the anti-hounds and baiting initiative passed in '96. In light of the fact that we'd already lost control of predator populations, can you really say that it was responsible to add another one that'll likely never be hunted in this state, at least until it's way too late? Cougertail is a record stuck on "it's cougars, it's cougars, it's cougars!!!" It's all of 'em and introducing wolves on top was idiotic. We should probably add grizzlies before we know the complete impact of the wolf introduction and then consider tigers and/or velociraptors. Our WDFW is completely blind to the predator problem we have and keeps throwing more fuel on the fire.
Quote from: Special T on May 01, 2018, 10:29:26 AMQuote from: Cougartail on May 01, 2018, 09:56:13 AMQuote from: pianoman9701 on May 01, 2018, 07:45:26 AMQuote from: jackmaster on May 01, 2018, 06:38:17 AMCougartail, wasn't Idahos numbers declining so fast that your state was losing out of state hunters and their money so your govenor declared war on wolves? Isn't that when the numbers in idaho stabalized ? If I remember corectly the moose and elk numbers were in big trouble I'm sure it was just cougars and bears. You've been reading propaganda again, haven't you JM? You guys are so smart.. First off, with all the wolf hating windbags on the internet why has Idaho never filled their wolf harvest quota? Typing is easier than leaving the comfort of your home and truck? Now for a history lesson.. Prior to the late 90s in Idaho the Lion harvest was on average 800 to 900 cats per year. After 1998 the average has been 400 to 500 cats per year. During the post 1998 era they added 1000 wolves roughly. Now, how many cats were added in that 20 years of reduced lion harvest, on average of 400 per year? (1998 to 2018)Simplistic explanations of complex population dynamics come from simple minds.. Do wolves reduce dear & elk populations, yes. Are they the largest contributor to the problem in Washington.. not even close. In Idaho, more so but still not the major cause of the decline.Now grab your red capes and baskets and head over to grandma's house... it will be ok.. I promise!!!! From your statement then the lack of harvest of all predators has contributed to the decline. As such they all need more management.As usual us sportsmen are arguing the details and ignoring the broad facts.The issue needs to be how do we in crease harvest of all predators in the areas most effected.?Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using TapatalkThank God someone sees it. The overall problem is really obvious to me. It's not JUST wolves. If you think it is, you've got blinders on.
Quote from: Cougartail on May 01, 2018, 09:56:13 AMQuote from: pianoman9701 on May 01, 2018, 07:45:26 AMQuote from: jackmaster on May 01, 2018, 06:38:17 AMCougartail, wasn't Idahos numbers declining so fast that your state was losing out of state hunters and their money so your govenor declared war on wolves? Isn't that when the numbers in idaho stabalized ? If I remember corectly the moose and elk numbers were in big trouble I'm sure it was just cougars and bears. You've been reading propaganda again, haven't you JM? You guys are so smart.. First off, with all the wolf hating windbags on the internet why has Idaho never filled their wolf harvest quota? Typing is easier than leaving the comfort of your home and truck? Now for a history lesson.. Prior to the late 90s in Idaho the Lion harvest was on average 800 to 900 cats per year. After 1998 the average has been 400 to 500 cats per year. During the post 1998 era they added 1000 wolves roughly. Now, how many cats were added in that 20 years of reduced lion harvest, on average of 400 per year? (1998 to 2018)Simplistic explanations of complex population dynamics come from simple minds.. Do wolves reduce dear & elk populations, yes. Are they the largest contributor to the problem in Washington.. not even close. In Idaho, more so but still not the major cause of the decline.Now grab your red capes and baskets and head over to grandma's house... it will be ok.. I promise!!!! From your statement then the lack of harvest of all predators has contributed to the decline. As such they all need more management.As usual us sportsmen are arguing the details and ignoring the broad facts.The issue needs to be how do we in crease harvest of all predators in the areas most effected.?Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
Quote from: pianoman9701 on May 01, 2018, 07:45:26 AMQuote from: jackmaster on May 01, 2018, 06:38:17 AMCougartail, wasn't Idahos numbers declining so fast that your state was losing out of state hunters and their money so your govenor declared war on wolves? Isn't that when the numbers in idaho stabalized ? If I remember corectly the moose and elk numbers were in big trouble I'm sure it was just cougars and bears. You've been reading propaganda again, haven't you JM? You guys are so smart.. First off, with all the wolf hating windbags on the internet why has Idaho never filled their wolf harvest quota? Typing is easier than leaving the comfort of your home and truck? Now for a history lesson.. Prior to the late 90s in Idaho the Lion harvest was on average 800 to 900 cats per year. After 1998 the average has been 400 to 500 cats per year. During the post 1998 era they added 1000 wolves roughly. Now, how many cats were added in that 20 years of reduced lion harvest, on average of 400 per year? (1998 to 2018)Simplistic explanations of complex population dynamics come from simple minds.. Do wolves reduce dear & elk populations, yes. Are they the largest contributor to the problem in Washington.. not even close. In Idaho, more so but still not the major cause of the decline.Now grab your red capes and baskets and head over to grandma's house... it will be ok.. I promise!!!!
Quote from: jackmaster on May 01, 2018, 06:38:17 AMCougartail, wasn't Idahos numbers declining so fast that your state was losing out of state hunters and their money so your govenor declared war on wolves? Isn't that when the numbers in idaho stabalized ? If I remember corectly the moose and elk numbers were in big trouble I'm sure it was just cougars and bears. You've been reading propaganda again, haven't you JM?
Cougartail, wasn't Idahos numbers declining so fast that your state was losing out of state hunters and their money so your govenor declared war on wolves? Isn't that when the numbers in idaho stabalized ? If I remember corectly the moose and elk numbers were in big trouble
Haven’t had hound hunting or baiting for bears and cats for around 20 years. Everyone agrees that ALL predators are a problem, so why all of a sudden are the numbers of deer elk and moose dropping? We’ve had a couple easy winters, had enough elk just a few years ago to have a ridiculous amount of special permits. The one difference in the past few years is, guess what, wolves! Adding the wolves have certainly had a negative impact on our herds, FACT or FICTION ?? Simple question
I disagree, that's like saying that 40% are killed by coyotes 30% by cougars 10% by bears but the 20% that are killed by wolves are the problem.
Quote from: Oh Mah on May 01, 2018, 10:56:18 PMI disagree, that's like saying that 40% are killed by coyotes 30% by cougars 10% by bears but the 20% that are killed by wolves are the problem. I don't think you understand a tipping point.
Wolves aren't a small problem in regions hit hardest by them, statewide they lag behind mt. lions for total deer killed sure, but in regions where wolves have a strong foot hold it's not "a small problem". If you happen to live or hunt in those area's you'd be on here saying they're a very big problem.
Quote from: KFhunter on May 02, 2018, 06:50:02 PMWolves aren't a small problem in regions hit hardest by them, statewide they lag behind mt. lions for total deer killed sure, but in regions where wolves have a strong foot hold it's not "a small problem". If you happen to live or hunt in those area's you'd be on here saying they're a very big problem.I hope this isnt aimed at me because i don't think its a small problem at all.Just pointing out the fact that all of them together need dealt with and us hunters can do a large portion of fixing it legally.Our native friends can fix part of it for us also legally.Everyone keeps bringing up quotas what about the native quotas oh wait there are none.The state puts (to us)unfair quotas because the Natives have there share if our quotas are filled or almost filled then we need to ask our fellow native hunters to step up their game and take out some of these predators with and for us.