collapse

Advertisement


Poll

Are you in favor of this bill?

Yes
No

Author Topic: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements  (Read 10430 times)

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10659
Background: The hunter orange requirement in WA is a regulation passed by the Fish and Wildlife Commission and not an actual law.

SB 5148 sponsored by Senators Wilson, L., Becker, Fortunato, Palumbo, Short, Takko, Wagoner, and Warnick would enact the hunter orange requirement into state law and also add "hunter pink" as an acceptable color other than "hunter orange." WDFW would still be required to enact regs to determine when the wearing of hunter orange/pink is required for hunters.

http://lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov/biennium/2019-20/Pdf/Bills/Senate%20Bills/5148.pdf

Offline Oh Mah

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2015
  • Posts: 6614
  • Location: region 3 Montana
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #1 on: January 18, 2019, 08:48:28 PM »
It's nice to see that some want to add to what is allowed instead of always taking away what was once allowed.  :tup:
"Boss of the woods"
(this is in reference to the biggie not me).

Offline Fl0und3rz

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 51553
  • Location: E. WA
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #2 on: January 18, 2019, 09:01:18 PM »
Should add a hunter orange requirement for all afield during big game modern firearm, hunting or not.

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39215
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #3 on: January 18, 2019, 09:07:17 PM »
Should add a hunter orange requirement for all afield during big game modern firearm, hunting or not.

No, the government shouldn't be telling random people how to dress.

Offline Oh Mah

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2015
  • Posts: 6614
  • Location: region 3 Montana
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #4 on: January 18, 2019, 09:08:01 PM »
 :yeah:
"Boss of the woods"
(this is in reference to the biggie not me).

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10659
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #5 on: January 18, 2019, 09:09:59 PM »
Should add a hunter orange requirement for all afield during big game modern firearm, hunting or not.
Will never happen. If it does it would be an agency rule for lands managed by that agency.

Offline Fl0und3rz

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 51553
  • Location: E. WA
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #6 on: January 18, 2019, 09:11:46 PM »
Fair point.

Offline WapitiTalk1

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 7958
  • Location: Wet Side, Rainier, WA
  • Groups: RMEF, NRA, US Army (R)
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #7 on: January 18, 2019, 09:15:47 PM »
Pink Camo?  Umm, ok  8)
Darton Archery Maverick II
Traditions Vortek StrikeFire Smoke Pole
Weatherby VG-2 Boomstick
"Poking at a campfire with a stick is one of life's great satisfactions." Patrick F. McManus

Offline Fl0und3rz

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 51553
  • Location: E. WA
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #8 on: January 18, 2019, 09:16:20 PM »
Should add a hunter orange requirement for all afield during big game modern firearm, hunting or not.

No, the government shouldn't be telling random people how to dress.

Not random.  People using the regulated lands. 

Offline luckyman

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2011
  • Posts: 471
  • Location: mount vernon
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #9 on: January 19, 2019, 07:03:56 AM »
My wife had someone take a shot while she was mushroom picking not more than 100' away. She never knew they where there. She wares orange now while out during mf season. A lot of people are un aware that its hunting season and never think to dress brightly.
I'm not sure.

Offline konradcountry

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2016
  • Posts: 1013
  • Location: SouthWest
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #10 on: January 19, 2019, 09:10:45 AM »
So glad they are working on high priorities.

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 38888
  • Location: Idaho<->Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, NWTF, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #11 on: January 19, 2019, 09:26:25 AM »
My wife had someone take a shot while she was mushroom picking not more than 100' away. She never knew they where there. She wares orange now while out during mf season. A lot of people are un aware that its hunting season and never think to dress brightly.

So true, we've seen people dressed in black out huckleberry picking during bear season! I like to see they want to add pink, but it worries me about the legislature getting more involved in hunting.

Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw needed) for spring bear, fall bear, bison, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, & wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered

Offline Oh Mah

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2015
  • Posts: 6614
  • Location: region 3 Montana
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #12 on: January 19, 2019, 11:02:16 AM »
 :dunno: seems like it can be a very good thing,Seems that they see that there is enough of both genders hunting this state and others.The more numbers we have the better for the sport and the animals.  :tup:  :twocents:
"Boss of the woods"
(this is in reference to the biggie not me).

Offline bradslam

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 518
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #13 on: January 19, 2019, 11:11:14 AM »
So glad they are working on high priorities.

Did you look at the bill?  It is one page that would one section to an existing RCW.  I don't think much time is being spent on this and it makes complete sense, as fluorescent pink is equally effective, if not more so, than fluorescent orange. This should be a no-brainer.

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39215
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #14 on: January 19, 2019, 11:18:45 AM »
So glad they are working on high priorities.

Did you look at the bill?  It is one page that would one section to an existing RCW.  I don't think much time is being spent on this and it makes complete sense, as fluorescent pink is equally effective, if not more so, than fluorescent orange. This should be a no-brainer.

 :yeah:

I probably won't won't wear pink even though I feel it's much more visible in the woods than orange. But I bet my daughters would like to wear a pink hat or a pink jacket. So I'm glad they're going to allow it. There's no reason not to.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

2025 deer, let's see em! by Shooter4
[Today at 08:10:30 AM]


Nevada bull hunt 2025 by HntnFsh
[Today at 08:06:15 AM]


2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by wadu1
[Today at 07:59:15 AM]


What gmu's in sw Washington hold elk? by Damnimissed
[Today at 07:33:17 AM]


New scope or not? by Sneaky
[Today at 07:02:05 AM]


Making memories by boneaddict
[Today at 06:17:16 AM]


Question about hunting wilderness areas by Threewolves
[Today at 04:01:56 AM]


Called about Returned Alta Buck Permit by Shrimper
[Yesterday at 10:17:51 PM]


My Entiat Late tag thread by Lapua338
[Yesterday at 09:46:32 PM]


Pouge unit help by Bone collector 13
[Yesterday at 08:57:11 PM]


Idaho unit 10A by Naches Sportsman
[Yesterday at 08:44:27 PM]


Any MT deer updates? by Britt-dog
[Yesterday at 08:32:50 PM]


Grizzly? by WapitiTalk1
[Yesterday at 07:38:21 PM]


Smith-Reynolds American Legion Post #14 Fall Raffle by Stein
[Yesterday at 07:35:27 PM]


Cash Poor/Equity Rich And Don't Want To Refinance by pianoman9701
[Yesterday at 07:13:04 PM]


Palouse buck deer by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 06:27:11 PM]


What pond creature am I dealing with here? by Barehunter
[Yesterday at 06:16:30 PM]


2025 Quality Chewuch Tag by Schmalzfam
[Yesterday at 05:53:47 PM]


What are some good 12 ga factory loads for predators? by fowl smacker
[Yesterday at 05:29:34 PM]


cougar calling locations by MADMAX
[Yesterday at 05:06:42 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal