collapse

Advertisement


Poll

Are you in favor of this bill?

Yes
No

Author Topic: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements  (Read 9747 times)

Online hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 8739
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #30 on: January 25, 2019, 07:11:18 PM »
Instead of a pumpkin patch, you'll have a ? patch.  Hmmm....what's something that is pink?
:yike:
Just another reason why I love that color. :chuckle: :chuckle:

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10634
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #31 on: February 04, 2019, 04:50:44 PM »
The bill was passed out of committee after an amendment was made. The new bill essentially states that WDFW must allow hunter orange and pink and WDFW is to determine when/where/how much is needed.

The bill is now sitting in the Senate Rules Committee which will determine if the bill will go on for a full Senate vote.

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21756
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #32 on: February 04, 2019, 05:02:59 PM »
The bill was passed out of committee after an amendment was made. The new bill essentially states that WDFW must allow hunter orange and pink and WDFW is to determine when/where/how much is needed.

The bill is now sitting in the Senate Rules Committee which will determine if the bill will go on for a full Senate vote.
OK. Why in the world wouldn't be exactly what they already require for hunter orange?

https://apps.leg.wa.gov/wac/default.aspx?cite=220-414-080

(1) Except as authorized in subsection (6) of this section, it is unlawful to hunt upland birds or rabbits during any upland game bird season unless the hunter is wearing fluorescent hunter orange clothing.
(2) It is unlawful to hunt deer or elk during all modern firearm general seasons in any manner unless the hunter is wearing fluorescent hunter orange clothing.
(3) All modern firearm permit holders must wear fluorescent hunter orange clothing.
(4) All master hunters must wear fluorescent hunter orange clothing during all deer and elk hunting seasons that allow the use of modern firearms, except as authorized by department permit.
(5) It is unlawful to hunt bear, cougar, bobcat, raccoon, fox, coyote, rabbit, forest grouse, turkey or hare during those times and in those places open to the taking of deer or elk during a modern firearm season, unless the hunter is wearing fluorescent hunter orange clothing.
(6) Persons who are hunting upland game birds during an upland game bird season with a muzzleloading firearm, bow and arrow or falconry are not required to wear fluorescent hunter orange clothing.
(7) Wearing fluorescent hunter orange clothing means: A minimum of 400 square inches of fluorescent hunter orange exterior clothing, worn above the waist and visible from all sides.
(8) A violation of this section is an infraction, punishable under RCW 77.15.160.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10634
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #33 on: February 04, 2019, 05:20:04 PM »
The bill was passed out of committee after an amendment was made. The new bill essentially states that WDFW must allow hunter orange and pink and WDFW is to determine when/where/how much is needed.

The bill is now sitting in the Senate Rules Committee which will determine if the bill will go on for a full Senate vote.
OK. Why in the world wouldn't be exactly what they already require for hunter orange?

https://apps.leg.wa.gov/wac/default.aspx?cite=220-414-080

(1) Except as authorized in subsection (6) of this section, it is unlawful to hunt upland birds or rabbits during any upland game bird season unless the hunter is wearing fluorescent hunter orange clothing.
(2) It is unlawful to hunt deer or elk during all modern firearm general seasons in any manner unless the hunter is wearing fluorescent hunter orange clothing.
(3) All modern firearm permit holders must wear fluorescent hunter orange clothing.
(4) All master hunters must wear fluorescent hunter orange clothing during all deer and elk hunting seasons that allow the use of modern firearms, except as authorized by department permit.
(5) It is unlawful to hunt bear, cougar, bobcat, raccoon, fox, coyote, rabbit, forest grouse, turkey or hare during those times and in those places open to the taking of deer or elk during a modern firearm season, unless the hunter is wearing fluorescent hunter orange clothing.
(6) Persons who are hunting upland game birds during an upland game bird season with a muzzleloading firearm, bow and arrow or falconry are not required to wear fluorescent hunter orange clothing.
(7) Wearing fluorescent hunter orange clothing means: A minimum of 400 square inches of fluorescent hunter orange exterior clothing, worn above the waist and visible from all sides.
(8) A violation of this section is an infraction, punishable under RCW 77.15.160.
Because what you posted is what the WDFW Commission has enacted as a regulation. There is no law passed by the legislature saying WDFW has to enact hunter orange/pink/rainbow colors. This bill would essentially force the WDFW Commission's hand by saying pink is allowed in addition to orange.

The Commission and WDFW could've prevented this whole thing in the first place if the commission at one of their meetings revised the current hunter orange reg and added pink as an acceptable color. But they haven't so now the lawmakers are forcing their hands.

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21756
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #34 on: February 04, 2019, 05:27:57 PM »
The bill was passed out of committee after an amendment was made. The new bill essentially states that WDFW must allow hunter orange and pink and WDFW is to determine when/where/how much is needed.

The bill is now sitting in the Senate Rules Committee which will determine if the bill will go on for a full Senate vote.
OK. Why in the world wouldn't be exactly what they already require for hunter orange?

https://apps.leg.wa.gov/wac/default.aspx?cite=220-414-080

(1) Except as authorized in subsection (6) of this section, it is unlawful to hunt upland birds or rabbits during any upland game bird season unless the hunter is wearing fluorescent hunter orange clothing.
(2) It is unlawful to hunt deer or elk during all modern firearm general seasons in any manner unless the hunter is wearing fluorescent hunter orange clothing.
(3) All modern firearm permit holders must wear fluorescent hunter orange clothing.
(4) All master hunters must wear fluorescent hunter orange clothing during all deer and elk hunting seasons that allow the use of modern firearms, except as authorized by department permit.
(5) It is unlawful to hunt bear, cougar, bobcat, raccoon, fox, coyote, rabbit, forest grouse, turkey or hare during those times and in those places open to the taking of deer or elk during a modern firearm season, unless the hunter is wearing fluorescent hunter orange clothing.
(6) Persons who are hunting upland game birds during an upland game bird season with a muzzleloading firearm, bow and arrow or falconry are not required to wear fluorescent hunter orange clothing.
(7) Wearing fluorescent hunter orange clothing means: A minimum of 400 square inches of fluorescent hunter orange exterior clothing, worn above the waist and visible from all sides.
(8) A violation of this section is an infraction, punishable under RCW 77.15.160.
Because what you posted is what the WDFW Commission has enacted as a regulation. There is no law passed by the legislature saying WDFW has to enact hunter orange/pink/rainbow colors. This bill would essentially force the WDFW Commission's hand by saying pink is allowed in addition to orange.

The Commission and WDFW could've prevented this whole thing in the first place if the commission at one of their meetings revised the current hunter orange reg and added pink as an acceptable color. But they haven't so now the lawmakers are forcing their hands.
I see. So now the WAC will be changed to read " fluorescent hunter orange OR pretty hunter pink"?
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline dreadi

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2016
  • Posts: 1317
  • Location: Tacoma
    • http://www.facebook.com/blackhammerarms
    • Black Hammer Arms
 At least one senator that sponsors this bill wants the state to require everyone to receive training and pass a class before you can carry a concealed pistol. This bill making it state law to wear orange says to me that they want yet more control over people and if it were my choice, I’d just make this bill go away.
BLACK HAMMER ARMS
Buy A Suppressor http://www.silencershop.com/blackhammerarms
1911 Pistolsmithing
Firearm Refinishing
GLOCK Certified Armorer
CMMG Authorized Dealer
NEMO Arms Authorized Dealer
http://www.blackhammerarms.com
http://www.facebook.com/blackhammerarms
https://www.instagram.com/blackhammerarms/

Offline BNAElkhntr

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2012
  • Posts: 730
  • Location: Cle Elum, Wa
  • Groups: Life member NRA, Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, SCI
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #36 on: February 04, 2019, 05:37:00 PM »
Should add a hunter orange requirement for all afield during big game modern firearm, hunting or not.

No, the government shouldn't be telling random people how to dress.
[size=78%]You Both Are Right I'd Like to see a little Information Put out   Say A PSA  for all persons in the woods That  if you aren't hunting Please consider wearing Orange or Pink somewhere and leave the Brown and Black at Home  If nothing else its easier to Find you if Lost[/size]

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10634
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #37 on: February 04, 2019, 05:47:59 PM »
The bill was passed out of committee after an amendment was made. The new bill essentially states that WDFW must allow hunter orange and pink and WDFW is to determine when/where/how much is needed.

The bill is now sitting in the Senate Rules Committee which will determine if the bill will go on for a full Senate vote.
OK. Why in the world wouldn't be exactly what they already require for hunter orange?

https://apps.leg.wa.gov/wac/default.aspx?cite=220-414-080

(1) Except as authorized in subsection (6) of this section, it is unlawful to hunt upland birds or rabbits during any upland game bird season unless the hunter is wearing fluorescent hunter orange clothing.
(2) It is unlawful to hunt deer or elk during all modern firearm general seasons in any manner unless the hunter is wearing fluorescent hunter orange clothing.
(3) All modern firearm permit holders must wear fluorescent hunter orange clothing.
(4) All master hunters must wear fluorescent hunter orange clothing during all deer and elk hunting seasons that allow the use of modern firearms, except as authorized by department permit.
(5) It is unlawful to hunt bear, cougar, bobcat, raccoon, fox, coyote, rabbit, forest grouse, turkey or hare during those times and in those places open to the taking of deer or elk during a modern firearm season, unless the hunter is wearing fluorescent hunter orange clothing.
(6) Persons who are hunting upland game birds during an upland game bird season with a muzzleloading firearm, bow and arrow or falconry are not required to wear fluorescent hunter orange clothing.
(7) Wearing fluorescent hunter orange clothing means: A minimum of 400 square inches of fluorescent hunter orange exterior clothing, worn above the waist and visible from all sides.
(8) A violation of this section is an infraction, punishable under RCW 77.15.160.
Because what you posted is what the WDFW Commission has enacted as a regulation. There is no law passed by the legislature saying WDFW has to enact hunter orange/pink/rainbow colors. This bill would essentially force the WDFW Commission's hand by saying pink is allowed in addition to orange.

The Commission and WDFW could've prevented this whole thing in the first place if the commission at one of their meetings revised the current hunter orange reg and added pink as an acceptable color. But they haven't so now the lawmakers are forcing their hands.
I see. So now the WAC will be changed to read " fluorescent hunter orange OR pretty hunter pink"?
Yes

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 38514
  • Location: Idaho<->Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, NWTF, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #38 on: February 04, 2019, 06:24:42 PM »
Sitting here in my pink camo office chair I'm ready for a rule change!  :chuckle:
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw needed) for spring bear, fall bear, bison, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, & wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered

Offline Skyvalhunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 16010
  • Location: Sky valley/Methow
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #39 on: February 04, 2019, 07:52:41 PM »
Are you wearing a tutu with it?
The only man who never makes a mistake, is the man who never does anything!!
The further one goes into the wilderness, the greater the attraction of its lonely freedom.

Offline Sitka_Blacktail

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 3395
  • Location: Hoquiam, WA
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #40 on: April 22, 2019, 10:42:33 PM »
Glad to see they are focusing on the real important hunting issues.  This will surely keep Washington hunters from going out of state to hunt.
A man who fears suffering is already suffering from what he fears. ~ Michel de Montaigne

Offline Gobble Doc

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 2680
  • Location: Snohomish, WA
More regulation. How about neon rainbow next to be more inclusive?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline SuperX

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 537
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #42 on: April 23, 2019, 08:07:56 AM »
for some of us, traditional is red and black plaid!   I would like to see wearing orange and pink for muzzy season too - at this point they shoot 200y and don't have scopes... seems way more likely to have a mis-identification with a muzzy than a MF with a scope.

Offline konradcountry

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2016
  • Posts: 1013
  • Location: SouthWest
Re: SB 5148 Would Add "Hunter Pink" to Current Hunter Orange Requirements
« Reply #43 on: April 23, 2019, 10:06:06 AM »
for some of us, traditional is red and black plaid!   I would like to see wearing orange and pink for muzzy season too - at this point they shoot 200y and don't have scopes... seems way more likely to have a mis-identification with a muzzy than a MF with a scope.

I doubt it is normally an identification problem.

If anything it is some j--ka-- just drunk and shooting at anything.

The last accident I recall involved a victim who was wearing orange. The hunter claimed he thought he was shooting at an elk.

Had no idea that elk wear safety orange.

I supposed I'd be fine with it for some crowded areas but the ranges should be left open.
« Last Edit: April 23, 2019, 10:11:50 AM by konradcountry »

Offline 7mmfan

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 5499
  • Location: Marysville
    • https://www.facebook.com/rory.oconnor.9480
More regulation. How about neon rainbow next to be more inclusive?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

How's it MORE regulation by offering alternatives? It's fairly well accepted that fluorescent pink is more visible to most than orange, so whats the problem?
I hunt, therefore I am.... I fish, therefore I lie.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Willapa Hills 1 Bear by TitusFord
[Today at 10:04:15 AM]


Tree stand for Western Washingtn by Shannon
[Today at 08:56:36 AM]


Range finders & Angle Compensation by kentrek
[Today at 08:42:17 AM]


Bearpaw Outfitters Annual July 4th Hunt Sale by bearpaw
[Today at 08:40:03 AM]


KODIAK06 2025 trail cam and personal pics thread by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 07:53:52 AM]


Pocket Carry by JimmyHoffa
[Today at 07:49:09 AM]


Yard bucks by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 11:20:39 PM]


Yard babies by Feathernfurr
[Yesterday at 10:04:54 PM]


Seeking recommendations on a new scope by coachg
[Yesterday at 08:10:21 PM]


Sauk Unit Youth Elk Tips by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 08:06:05 PM]


Jupiter Mountain Rayonier Permit- 621 Bull Tag by HntnFsh
[Yesterday at 07:58:22 PM]


MOVED: Seekins Element 7PRC for sale by Bob33
[Yesterday at 06:57:10 PM]


3 pintails by metlhead
[Yesterday at 04:44:03 PM]


1993 Merc issues getting up on plane by Happy Gilmore
[Yesterday at 04:37:55 PM]


A lonely Job... by AL WORRELLS KID
[Yesterday at 03:21:14 PM]


Unit 364 Archery Tag by buglebuster
[Yesterday at 12:16:59 PM]


In the background by zwickeyman
[Yesterday at 12:10:13 PM]


A. Cole Lockback in AEB-L and Micarta by A. Cole
[Yesterday at 09:15:34 AM]


Sockeye Numbers by Southpole
[July 03, 2025, 09:02:04 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal