collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: WDFW and ODFW to undo the Columbia R gillnet reforms?  (Read 5960 times)

Offline Antlershed

  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 4822
  • Location: Olympia, WA
WDFW and ODFW to undo the Columbia R gillnet reforms?
« on: February 26, 2019, 06:59:49 PM »
Just saw this posted on the CCA-Oregon Facebook page. Looks like we’re gonna get screwed.

Quote
Today, a joint-state committee of Oregon and Washington fish and wildlife commissioners voted 4-2 to recommend a return to non-tribal gillnetting in the lower mainstem Columbia River during the spring and summer seasons and an increase in mainstem gillnetting during the fall season.

The recommendation to undo the 2012 bi-state Columbia River gillnet reforms comes as Columbia River salmon and steelhead returns have plummeted in recent years – leading to recreational fishing closures throughout the Columbia River basin. The vote also comes at the same time WDFW and ODFW are asking their respective legislatures to reauthorize the Columbia River Basin Salmon and Steelhead Endorsement paid for by recreational anglers.  WDFW is also seeking a recreational license fee increase.

The recommendation will now go to each state’s fish and wildlife commission, which would have to modify their policies/rules to reverse the Columbia River reforms, return gillnets to the mainstem, and reduce recreational fishing opportunity.

The Washington Commission will be meeting in Spokane on March 1-2 where we expect Washington Commissioner Don McIsaac (Hockinson) to push for their adoption – hundreds of miles away from most of the fisheries affected by the decision.  The recommendation would also make barbless hooks “voluntary” in Columbia River recreational fisheries – a clear effort to distract anglers from the vote to undo the bi-state fishery reforms and harm our fisheries.

With the 2019 spring chinook run projected to be below 50% of the ten-year average, and summer chinook forecasted to barely meet escapment, a non-tribal gill net fishery on the lower mainstem Columbia River would be extraordinarily reckless. The fall chinook forecast is equally poor, and with record low returns of wild steelhead over the past two years, mainstem gillnetting could further erode many struggling ESA-listed stocks. 

CCA will be sending out more details and action alerts shortly, so stay turned for more updates. The votes were as follows:

Yes – McIsaac (WA), Kehoe (WA), Buckmaster (OR), Akenson (OR)
No – Graybill (WA), Webber (OR)

Offline jeffitz

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 339
  • Location: SW WA
Re: WDFW and ODFW to undo the Columbia R gillnet reforms?
« Reply #1 on: February 26, 2019, 07:10:14 PM »
What. a. Freaking. Disaster.
If you're gonna be dumb,you gotta be tough.

Offline branches

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2014
  • Posts: 413
  • Location: Olympia,Wa
Re: WDFW and ODFW to undo the Columbia R gillnet reforms?
« Reply #2 on: February 26, 2019, 07:13:44 PM »
Thank you for posting this. I think this new is LAME!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The Columbia should be for recreational fisherman always.  :twocents:

Offline ASHQUACK

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 955
Re: WDFW and ODFW to undo the Columbia R gillnet reforms?
« Reply #3 on: February 26, 2019, 07:19:58 PM »
 So, should I be expecting a refund from WDFW for the Columbia River Enhancement I've had to pay since it's inception?

Offline NorseNW

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2015
  • Posts: 451
Re: WDFW and ODFW to undo the Columbia R gillnet reforms?
« Reply #4 on: February 26, 2019, 08:22:52 PM »
Glad this came up in a timely fashion.  Tried to purchase new licenses this weekend for the family but their website was down.  I would have purchased Columbia River endorsements.  Saved me some money now I won't be purchasing the endorsement. 

Amazing that this is the only river in the World that is still commercially netted.

Offline X-Force

  • Solo Hunter
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 5567
Re: WDFW and ODFW to undo the Columbia R gillnet reforms?
« Reply #5 on: February 26, 2019, 08:47:53 PM »
Doesn’t make any sense. It will probably be turned by FW... or someone will sue on behalf of ESA fish
People get offended at nothing at all. So, speak your mind and be unapologetic.

Offline MtnMuley

  • Site Sponsor
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 8686
  • Location: NCW
Re: WDFW and ODFW to undo the Columbia R gillnet reforms?
« Reply #6 on: February 26, 2019, 08:58:03 PM »
In my opinion, if their nets should be pulled out, then all nets need to be pulled out.  :twocents:

Offline Mtnwalker

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2015
  • Posts: 2279
  • Location: Selah
Re: WDFW and ODFW to undo the Columbia R gillnet reforms?
« Reply #7 on: February 26, 2019, 09:11:08 PM »
Side note- dude from OR lucked out with a saweeet last name! Buckmaster  :chuckle:

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32899
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: WDFW and ODFW to undo the Columbia R gillnet reforms?
« Reply #8 on: February 26, 2019, 09:28:22 PM »
 Is this a result of some WSU study suggesting that the reason our returns are so poor is because we stopped commercial netting, and that the more we net, the higher our numbers of return will be? :rolleyes:
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline Antlershed

  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 4822
  • Location: Olympia, WA
Re: WDFW and ODFW to undo the Columbia R gillnet reforms?
« Reply #9 on: February 27, 2019, 04:59:58 AM »
In my opinion, if their nets should be pulled out, then all nets need to be pulled out.  :twocents:
I agree that all gillnets should be banned, and SB 5617 could have potentially accomplished that had it not been amended before it was passed out of committee. However, we have been fishing with barbless hooks on the Columbia as a concession ever since the Columbia River plan was agreed to, as well as Oregonians have been paying a CR endorsement that was designed to be used to get the gill nets off the CR (our CR endorsement came long before the CR Gillnet Reform).

Offline Skyvalhunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 16010
  • Location: Sky valley/Methow
Re: WDFW and ODFW to undo the Columbia R gillnet reforms?
« Reply #10 on: February 27, 2019, 05:20:09 AM »
Would be tough to cut only a small group from gill netting if you didn't cut all if you want recovery
The only man who never makes a mistake, is the man who never does anything!!
The further one goes into the wilderness, the greater the attraction of its lonely freedom.

Offline Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 12961
  • Location: Arlington
Re: WDFW and ODFW to undo the Columbia R gillnet reforms?
« Reply #11 on: February 27, 2019, 07:53:37 AM »
I love WDFW, always on the right side of science and conservation.

Sure, we would love to pay more to get shut out.

The only answer is to cut their funding.  Please consider what you buy from them this year.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Sitka_Blacktail

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 3395
  • Location: Hoquiam, WA
Re: WDFW and ODFW to undo the Columbia R gillnet reforms?
« Reply #12 on: February 27, 2019, 08:19:04 AM »

Amazing that this is the only river in the World that is still commercially netted.

Wrong...... Chehalis River still commercially netted, Willapa River, still commercially netted, Yukon River, still commercially netted, Deep River, still commercially netted, Fraser River, still commercially netted, Youngs Bay still commercially netted. Naknek River still commercially netted. Copper River, still commercially netted. Kuskokwim River, still commercially netted.


A man who fears suffering is already suffering from what he fears. ~ Michel de Montaigne

Offline Mfowl

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2012
  • Posts: 4396
  • Location: westside
Re: WDFW and ODFW to undo the Columbia R gillnet reforms?
« Reply #13 on: February 27, 2019, 08:50:33 AM »
 :'( >:(   F WDFW!
Fish hard, hunt harder!

Offline Badhabit

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 1235
Re: WDFW and ODFW to undo the Columbia R gillnet reforms?
« Reply #14 on: February 27, 2019, 09:06:01 AM »
That's some crazy talk right there. Would the non-Tribal gillnetting season coincide with the Tribal gillnetting season? Once quotas are reached then all nets come out? Personally, I would rather see an escapement quota reached for each run and then allow gillnetting.

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32899
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: WDFW and ODFW to undo the Columbia R gillnet reforms?
« Reply #15 on: February 27, 2019, 09:28:02 AM »

Amazing that this is the only river in the World that is still commercially netted.

Wrong...... Chehalis River still commercially netted, Willapa River, still commercially netted, Yukon River, still commercially netted, Deep River, still commercially netted, Fraser River, still commercially netted, Youngs Bay still commercially netted. Naknek River still commercially netted. Copper River, still commercially netted. Kuskokwim River, still commercially netted.

 Are all those rivers netted, or are the mouths of the rivers netted?
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline SkookumHntr

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 2900
  • Location: Tono, WA
Re: WDFW and ODFW to undo the Columbia R gillnet reforms?
« Reply #16 on: February 27, 2019, 10:47:05 AM »
Never a better time to join CCA, there fighting for us recreational fisherman!
IBEW89 RMEF MDF CCA

Offline huntnnw

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9633
  • Location: Spokane
Re: WDFW and ODFW to undo the Columbia R gillnet reforms?
« Reply #17 on: February 27, 2019, 10:31:25 PM »
what a complete joke for our fisheries!  sad day for anglers who pursue these fish

Offline Sitka_Blacktail

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 3395
  • Location: Hoquiam, WA
Re: WDFW and ODFW to undo the Columbia R gillnet reforms?
« Reply #18 on: February 28, 2019, 07:41:41 AM »
That's some crazy talk right there. Would the non-Tribal gillnetting season coincide with the Tribal gillnetting season? Once quotas are reached then all nets come out? Personally, I would rather see an escapement quota reached for each run and then allow gillnetting.

Agreed. And one thing I will say, Washington sets their escapement quotas way too low. Possibly because there are so many users squabbling over the crumbs. The other pink elephant in the room is hatchery fish. It's hard to get good numbers on wild fish when they are mixed in with hatchery fish in the main stem of river systems. until they get to their brood streams. By then it's too late to give more or less opportunity.  Alaska has used sonar for counting escapement for many years but that won't work with hatchery fish in the mix.
A man who fears suffering is already suffering from what he fears. ~ Michel de Montaigne

Offline ASHQUACK

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 955
Re: WDFW and ODFW to undo the Columbia R gillnet reforms?
« Reply #19 on: February 28, 2019, 06:57:35 PM »
 I guess at least they announced it before everyone had already bought their licenses this year.

Offline Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 12961
  • Location: Arlington
Re: WDFW and ODFW to undo the Columbia R gillnet reforms?
« Reply #20 on: February 28, 2019, 07:26:02 PM »
That's some crazy talk right there. Would the non-Tribal gillnetting season coincide with the Tribal gillnetting season? Once quotas are reached then all nets come out? Personally, I would rather see an escapement quota reached for each run and then allow gillnetting.

Agreed. And one thing I will say, Washington sets their escapement quotas way too low. Possibly because there are so many users squabbling over the crumbs. The other pink elephant in the room is hatchery fish. It's hard to get good numbers on wild fish when they are mixed in with hatchery fish in the main stem of river systems. until they get to their brood streams. By then it's too late to give more or less opportunity.  Alaska has used sonar for counting escapement for many years but that won't work with hatchery fish in the mix.

Don't worry, the Orca Task Force will take care of the problem of hatchery fish being in the mix.

Offline Badhabit

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 1235
Re: WDFW and ODFW to undo the Columbia R gillnet reforms?
« Reply #21 on: February 28, 2019, 07:40:29 PM »
Doesn't the Bonneville and the other fish ladders have a wild vs hatchery count

Offline fowl smacker

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2013
  • Posts: 2219
  • Location: Castle Rock
  • Groups: DU, Delta Waterfowl, RMEF, Friends of the Cowlitz
Re: WDFW and ODFW to undo the Columbia R gillnet reforms?
« Reply #22 on: February 28, 2019, 07:42:39 PM »
Never a better time to join CCA, there fighting for us recreational fisherman!
Used to be a CCA member.  Quit giving them money a couple years ago.  From what I can tell, they haven't done crap for OR or WA.  Maybe I'm wrong, but not seeing results.  I've decided not to purchase my license at ALL this yr.  Time to let the $ do the talking.

Offline Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 12961
  • Location: Arlington
Re: WDFW and ODFW to undo the Columbia R gillnet reforms?
« Reply #23 on: February 28, 2019, 08:01:08 PM »
Never a better time to join CCA, there fighting for us recreational fisherman!
Used to be a CCA member.  Quit giving them money a couple years ago.  From what I can tell, they haven't done crap for OR or WA.  Maybe I'm wrong, but not seeing results.  I've decided not to purchase my license at ALL this yr.  Time to let the $ do the talking.

I'm with you, although I decided to buy less - no CR endorsement or freshwater, only saltwater and only after the seasons are announced.  Also, instead of buying everything for the entire family, we will probably only buy half of what we did last year.  For hunting, probably 1/3.

I truly believe that this is the only avenue.  We can attend meetings, send our money to any group you can name and none of that has done anything.  They sit by and clap at the Orca Taskforce, the governor, special interests and anyone other than the biologists or the source of the vast majority of funding - aka hunters and fishermen.

Offline castie2504

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2014
  • Posts: 295
  • Location: yakima
Re: WDFW and ODFW to undo the Columbia R gillnet reforms?
« Reply #24 on: March 01, 2019, 01:01:04 PM »
Unbelievable. Why are they even considering this when the numbers for a years have been so bad? What’s incredible is that this year’s projection is even worse than the past few years and ten year average actual returns. What are those people thinking? I’m sick and tired of the recreational fishermen playing fiddle to the commercial outfits.  :bash:
Life's a garden, Dig it!

Offline Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 12961
  • Location: Arlington
Re: WDFW and ODFW to undo the Columbia R gillnet reforms?
« Reply #25 on: March 01, 2019, 05:25:12 PM »
I looked through the presentation, they are using projections that under any of the options in consideration, there will be more angler trips in 2019 compared to pre-policy (2010).  What they don't do is adjust for the number of anglers now compared to then or address the concern over years when the run comes in low (seems to be the norm now) and how sport can get shut out or have very unpredictable seasons.

The story they are telling is that even with increased netting, the sports win and the commercials lose.

The good news is that barbless would move to voluntary.

Offline Antlershed

  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 4822
  • Location: Olympia, WA

Offline Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 12961
  • Location: Arlington
Re: WDFW and ODFW to undo the Columbia R gillnet reforms?
« Reply #27 on: March 02, 2019, 05:45:36 PM »
....and here it is.  :bash:

http://nwsportsmanmag.com/wdfw-fish-commission-adopts-columbia-subpanel-reform-recommendation/

Quote
I suspect the people who fund this agency will be in revolt until this shameful vote is overturned.”

Let's hope so.  Gentlemen and ladies, there is no other solution.  How much fishing and hunting opportunity are you willing to lose before you take action?

The commission published blatantly false information showing that there will be no loss to sportsmen days on the water, but failed to mention that they plan on taking 12.5% of our quota.  We all know there are not many chinook available and we just lost bigtime. 

The only way to get the message across is to cut funding by not purchasing as much as you did last year.  Think about what you could do without this year, or at least delay it as long as possible.

Offline Tinmaniac

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2017
  • Posts: 340
  • Location: Wetside
Re: WDFW and ODFW to undo the Columbia R gillnet reforms?
« Reply #28 on: March 02, 2019, 07:35:49 PM »
Funny that they would allow barbed hooks again.Barbless hooks were supposed to decrease fish mortality.Not sure how it is on the Columbia but seasons are closed early due to fish encounters,not actual numbers of fish caught.Seems to me they will change the formula used to determine fish mortality due to the perceived notion that there is higher fish mortality when barbed hooks are used.

Offline Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 12961
  • Location: Arlington
Re: WDFW and ODFW to undo the Columbia R gillnet reforms?
« Reply #29 on: March 02, 2019, 11:47:46 PM »
Yep, get ready for short seasons.  More encounters for commercials and a higher rate.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Blacklab

  • Site Sponsor
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 8162
Re: WDFW and ODFW to undo the Columbia R gillnet reforms?
« Reply #30 on: March 04, 2019, 04:31:18 PM »
Acidnine if this get rolled back. Greed is whats fueling the fire. They had 3 years to change nets with our $ and did nothing. 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
Hey! I'm not a complete idiot I have parts missing. Though sometimes I wonder.

If you want to make God laugh tell him your plans.

Offline ASHQUACK

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 955
Re: WDFW and ODFW to undo the Columbia R gillnet reforms?
« Reply #31 on: March 04, 2019, 05:55:26 PM »
Unfortunately every fish that is hooked is counted as a dead fish. When the fish checkers ask i always tell them the only encounters i have are the ones in the fish box.


Funny that they would allow barbed hooks again.Barbless hooks were supposed to decrease fish mortality.Not sure how it is on the Columbia but seasons are closed early due to fish encounters,not actual numbers of fish caught.Seems to me they will change the formula used to determine fish mortality due to the perceived notion that there is higher fish mortality when barbed hooks are used.

Offline fowl smacker

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2013
  • Posts: 2219
  • Location: Castle Rock
  • Groups: DU, Delta Waterfowl, RMEF, Friends of the Cowlitz
Re: WDFW and ODFW to undo the Columbia R gillnet reforms?
« Reply #32 on: March 05, 2019, 04:46:00 AM »
Well it's official.  Nets are going back in.  PEOPLE, NOW IS THE TIME TO STOP PURCHASING FISHING LICENSES!  IT SEEMS TO BE THE ONLY WAY ANYTHING IS GOING TO GET DONE.  TAKE AWAY THEIR FUNDING.  WHEN TIME COMES VOTE OUT THE GOVERNOR!  This has become such a disastrous political joke.
« Last Edit: March 05, 2019, 08:03:05 AM by fowl smacker »

Offline BigGoonTuna

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 2418
  • Location: Yelm
Re: WDFW and ODFW to undo the Columbia R gillnet reforms?
« Reply #33 on: March 05, 2019, 06:48:18 AM »
well, at least this will be good for the handful of hobby netters down in astoria that have the sacred duty of supplying the non fishing public with salmon  :rolleyes:
you can still get gas in heaven, and a drink in kingdom come,
in the meantime, i'll be cleaning my gun

Offline WSU

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 5501
Re: WDFW and ODFW to undo the Columbia R gillnet reforms?
« Reply #34 on: March 05, 2019, 10:03:12 AM »
Salmon management is a train wreck.  WDFW management has had years to implement these changes, all with funding agreed to by the rec community.  They enabled an obsolete industry and, now that they did nothing, implementing the policy will be painful.  Rather than make everyone take their medicine, which they've known has been prescribed for years, we trash thousands of hours of work and hundreds of thousands of dollars in dollars spent.

Why?  Because WDFW fisheries management is run by dip*censored*s with no spine.  But hey, at least this all coincided with a year the hobby netters can have nice mop up coho fishery.  Too bad for the endangered B run steelhead, chinook, etc. that will be slaughtered in the process. 

Offline MtnMuley

  • Site Sponsor
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 8686
  • Location: NCW
Re: WDFW and ODFW to undo the Columbia R gillnet reforms?
« Reply #35 on: March 05, 2019, 10:17:57 AM »
Salmon management is a train wreck.  WDFW management has had years to implement these changes, all with funding agreed to by the rec community.  They enabled an obsolete industry and, now that they did nothing, implementing the policy will be painful.  Rather than make everyone take their medicine, which they've known has been prescribed for years, we trash thousands of hours of work and hundreds of thousands of dollars in dollars spent.

Why?  Because WDFW fisheries management is run by dip*censored*s with no spine.  But hey, at least this all coincided with a year the hobby netters can have nice mop up coho fishery.  Too bad for the endangered B run steelhead, chinook, etc. that will be slaughtered in the process.
:yeah:

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

2025 Crab! by WAcoueshunter
[Today at 09:45:00 PM]


Son drawn - Silver Dollar Youth Any Elk - Help? by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 09:42:07 PM]


Bear behavior by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 09:36:32 PM]


Toutle Quality Bull - Rifle by HntnFsh
[Today at 08:09:14 PM]


AUCTION: SE Idaho DIY Deer or Deer/Elk Hunt by WoolyRunner
[Today at 06:39:13 PM]


2025 Montana alternate list by Wingin it
[Today at 06:28:33 PM]


A lonely Job... by AL WORRELLS KID
[Today at 03:53:25 PM]


MA-10 Coho by WAcoueshunter
[Today at 02:08:31 PM]


KODIAK06 2025 trail cam and personal pics thread by kodiak06
[Today at 01:52:01 PM]


Blue Mtn Foothills West Rifle Tag by Trooper
[Today at 01:18:40 PM]


GROUSE 2025...the Season is looming! by Dave Workman
[Today at 01:01:22 PM]


50 inch SXS and Tracks? by jrebel
[Today at 11:20:33 AM]


Sockeye Numbers by Southpole
[Today at 11:12:46 AM]


3 pintails by metlhead
[Today at 11:07:43 AM]


Modified game cart... 🛒 by Dan-o
[Today at 08:44:37 AM]


Velvet by Brute
[Today at 08:37:08 AM]


Calling Bears by hunter399
[Today at 06:12:44 AM]


HUNTNNW 2025 trail cam thread and photos by kodiak06
[Today at 05:43:11 AM]


Lizard Cam by NOCK NOCK
[Today at 04:48:54 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal