Free: Contests & Raffles.
Driving N. Idaho fews years back in the snow we cut dozens of different sets of moose tracks. Every single one had a wolf or more following them. Boggles my mind how we have any moose left at all.
Quote from: Magnum_Willys on April 04, 2019, 12:24:42 PMDriving N. Idaho fews years back in the snow we cut dozens of different sets of moose tracks. Every single one had a wolf or more following them. Boggles my mind how we have any moose left at all. Exactly. Climate change? What a farce! In North Idaho moose decline directly correlates with wolf numbers
Quote from: buglebrush on April 04, 2019, 01:29:50 PMQuote from: Magnum_Willys on April 04, 2019, 12:24:42 PMDriving N. Idaho fews years back in the snow we cut dozens of different sets of moose tracks. Every single one had a wolf or more following them. Boggles my mind how we have any moose left at all. Exactly. Climate change? What a farce! In North Idaho moose decline directly correlates with wolf numbersWouldn't the "climate change" have too make winters warmer to create the tick problem? I wouldn't say we have had warmer winters for a while quite the opposite. I know the moose all died because of global warming and ticks but why did the ticks decide to finally kill the moose when the wolves showed up? I guess I will have to ask a biologist
Quote from: benhuntin on April 04, 2019, 08:37:37 AMWDFW doesn’t care about Moose or hunters. As long as they can keep selling tags. Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkIf we go for reduced tags rather than increased predator control we're missing the forest for the trees. WDFW needs to hear one unified and unrelenting voice from Sportsmen and that's the desperate need for aggressive predator management. Everything else is just smoke and mirrors without it.
WDFW doesn’t care about Moose or hunters. As long as they can keep selling tags. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote from: buglebrush on April 04, 2019, 10:47:17 AMQuote from: benhuntin on April 04, 2019, 08:37:37 AMWDFW doesn’t care about Moose or hunters. As long as they can keep selling tags. Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkIf we go for reduced tags rather than increased predator control we're missing the forest for the trees. WDFW needs to hear one unified and unrelenting voice from Sportsmen and that's the desperate need for aggressive predator management. Everything else is just smoke and mirrors without it. But as we have already seen some hunters agree that cutting hunting to help the herds is a plus, they seem to forget it's the uncontrolled predators that's having the biggest impact.
Quote from: wolfbait on April 05, 2019, 09:52:33 PMQuote from: buglebrush on April 04, 2019, 10:47:17 AMQuote from: benhuntin on April 04, 2019, 08:37:37 AMWDFW doesn’t care about Moose or hunters. As long as they can keep selling tags. Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkIf we go for reduced tags rather than increased predator control we're missing the forest for the trees. WDFW needs to hear one unified and unrelenting voice from Sportsmen and that's the desperate need for aggressive predator management. Everything else is just smoke and mirrors without it. But as we have already seen some hunters agree that cutting hunting to help the herds is a plus, they seem to forget it's the uncontrolled predators that's having the biggest impact.As far as Idaho goes though you can hunt and kill wolves and you can run dogs for cats. So I applaud the recognition of reduced #'s and the reduction of tags in an attempt to help the #'s rebound.
Quote from: fishngamereaper on April 06, 2019, 06:20:16 AMQuote from: wolfbait on April 05, 2019, 09:52:33 PMQuote from: buglebrush on April 04, 2019, 10:47:17 AMQuote from: benhuntin on April 04, 2019, 08:37:37 AMWDFW doesn’t care about Moose or hunters. As long as they can keep selling tags. Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkIf we go for reduced tags rather than increased predator control we're missing the forest for the trees. WDFW needs to hear one unified and unrelenting voice from Sportsmen and that's the desperate need for aggressive predator management. Everything else is just smoke and mirrors without it. But as we have already seen some hunters agree that cutting hunting to help the herds is a plus, they seem to forget it's the uncontrolled predators that's having the biggest impact.As far as Idaho goes though you can hunt and kill wolves and you can run dogs for cats. So I applaud the recognition of reduced #'s and the reduction of tags in an attempt to help the #'s rebound. I just heard Idaho increased wolf tags to 20 from 10. Idaho has gone all out on every predator AND they have the wisdom to still cut tags at the cost of revenue. They have proposed lions with dogs stay open through June which I think they are going over board on cat control but they just keep adding to the wolf seasons which is great. Idaho big game is going to be fine Washington on the other hand might be screwed