Free: Contests & Raffles.
The surveys dont count all the elk. The colock especially. There's areas elk winter in that don't get counted. Do they count the YTC herd? How many of those elk migrated because of snow in colock over rye/i-90 to YTC and stayed?Not saying targeting of certain sexes doesn't have an adverse affect, just saying it's not the only reason.
the over abundance of cougars, bear and the newest predator the wolf also have an impact?
Quote from: PlateauNDN on September 13, 2019, 07:29:27 PM the over abundance of cougars, bear and the newest predator the wolf also have an impact? The combination of site predators and ambush predators does way more damage than either alone.If you want to bust on Yakimas do it for not running hounds all across the ceded lands.Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
Quote from: Special T on September 13, 2019, 09:11:29 PMQuote from: PlateauNDN on September 13, 2019, 07:29:27 PM the over abundance of cougars, bear and the newest predator the wolf also have an impact? The combination of site predators and ambush predators does way more damage than either alone.If you want to bust on Yakimas do it for not running hounds all across the ceded lands.Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using TapatalkI think the assumption here is the Yakamas can hunt cats to numbers of their choosing. Can they? For the coast, WDFW bios seem to really follow the tribal cat take and use it to adjust the next year's quota (I've heard). So, if the quota we see listed for state hunters is six cats for the GMU, then WDFW figures the tribe takes six too. If over quota one year, then it would decrease the next. Thinking wishfully, a few tribal houndsmen could knock back 90% of the cats--but I think WDFW has ways to counter it.
WE, are the only reason? Couldn't migrating and not returning, or the over abundance of cougars, bear and the newest predator the wolf also have an impact? There was a report posted here about cougars having a bigger impact on elk then wolves. Though I'd take it with a big scoop of salt as it does seem one-sided and narrow reporting.But who cares, let's just blame the Natives as it's easier to point fingers at them.
Quote from: PlateauNDN on September 13, 2019, 07:29:27 PMWE, are the only reason? Couldn't migrating and not returning, or the over abundance of cougars, bear and the newest predator the wolf also have an impact? There was a report posted here about cougars having a bigger impact on elk then wolves. Though I'd take it with a big scoop of salt as it does seem one-sided and narrow reporting.But who cares, let's just blame the Natives as it's easier to point fingers at them. YOU are not the reason. And we should all be better about generalizing but there are definitely several members of your tribe that are at fault for this. There's really no denying it. I'm not trying to pick a fight with you on this, but it's absolutely true. Direct your anger at the bad apples on your rez giving your tribe a bad rep, not the people on this site that are justified to have the perception that we do. And yes, predators take some animals as well.
Quote from: Tbar on September 13, 2019, 02:22:32 PMQuote from: TriggerMike on September 13, 2019, 01:45:09 PMhttps://www.yakimaherald.com/sports/outdoors/troubling-decline-falling-elk-populations-bring-hunting-reductions/article_f8725d29-b19e-503d-af9a-0c1c18054831.htmlFull article at the link above but two specific paragraphs in this that were the biggest takeaways for me are:1.) "Local Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife biologist Jeff Bernatowicz said no studies have been done on area calves and researchers don’t know why their survival numbers are historically low. Until that trend reverses, hunters must pay the price with fewer permits available and shortened seasons for archers."Why have no studies been done on this?2.) "Bernatowicz noted hunters could also see negative effects from a pair of factors outside their control. Access to the Yakima Training Center will be limited this fall by heavy training activity, and unofficial reports from one tribe show total tribal harvest may be exceeding the number of new branched bulls in the herd, according to the wildlife department."So the tribe is self reporting that they're literally killing off the bulls? Killing more bulls then are being recruited as calves each year. Wow. Also the Colockum herd has declined as well. They're currently at 4,133 elk up there and the WDFW's goal is 6,000.The colockum was an intentional herd reduction. I believe they reduced their objectives as well....According to the hunting prospects that were published last week, both herds are below their population objectives. And just a few years ago the Colockum herd was over 6,000 elk.https://wdfw.wa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/02103/district_8_hunting_prospects_2019.pdf
Quote from: TriggerMike on September 13, 2019, 01:45:09 PMhttps://www.yakimaherald.com/sports/outdoors/troubling-decline-falling-elk-populations-bring-hunting-reductions/article_f8725d29-b19e-503d-af9a-0c1c18054831.htmlFull article at the link above but two specific paragraphs in this that were the biggest takeaways for me are:1.) "Local Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife biologist Jeff Bernatowicz said no studies have been done on area calves and researchers don’t know why their survival numbers are historically low. Until that trend reverses, hunters must pay the price with fewer permits available and shortened seasons for archers."Why have no studies been done on this?2.) "Bernatowicz noted hunters could also see negative effects from a pair of factors outside their control. Access to the Yakima Training Center will be limited this fall by heavy training activity, and unofficial reports from one tribe show total tribal harvest may be exceeding the number of new branched bulls in the herd, according to the wildlife department."So the tribe is self reporting that they're literally killing off the bulls? Killing more bulls then are being recruited as calves each year. Wow. Also the Colockum herd has declined as well. They're currently at 4,133 elk up there and the WDFW's goal is 6,000.The colockum was an intentional herd reduction. I believe they reduced their objectives as well....
https://www.yakimaherald.com/sports/outdoors/troubling-decline-falling-elk-populations-bring-hunting-reductions/article_f8725d29-b19e-503d-af9a-0c1c18054831.htmlFull article at the link above but two specific paragraphs in this that were the biggest takeaways for me are:1.) "Local Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife biologist Jeff Bernatowicz said no studies have been done on area calves and researchers don’t know why their survival numbers are historically low. Until that trend reverses, hunters must pay the price with fewer permits available and shortened seasons for archers."Why have no studies been done on this?2.) "Bernatowicz noted hunters could also see negative effects from a pair of factors outside their control. Access to the Yakima Training Center will be limited this fall by heavy training activity, and unofficial reports from one tribe show total tribal harvest may be exceeding the number of new branched bulls in the herd, according to the wildlife department."So the tribe is self reporting that they're literally killing off the bulls? Killing more bulls then are being recruited as calves each year. Wow. Also the Colockum herd has declined as well. They're currently at 4,133 elk up there and the WDFW's goal is 6,000.