collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: The person running the Bureau of Land Management Should Not be an Eco-Terrorist  (Read 6237 times)

Offline downtownbrown0610

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: May 2019
  • Posts: 75
  • Location: Pierce County, WA
  • Groups: MDF, FLRD
I was reading up on this whole thing the other day. I do not agree with this at all. It is also very unnerving to me the amount of people that are willing to look past something like this. I always give people the benefit of the doubt, but to me this is not ok. I am not one for discussing politics or partisan issues but you cant tell me this is the best person we could come up with!?!? Do I think that she honestly cares about the administering of federal lands and their proper use? yes probably. Do I think that there is another agenda at play? 100% absolutely. Give an inch and they will take a mile. We do not have many more inches to give......
First In Last Out!

Offline jstone

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2009
  • Posts: 6646
Talent= they can hire whoever they want qualified or not.

Offline WAcoyotehunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 4457
  • Location: Pend Oreille County
I don't give her a pass for spiking trees

With so many well qualified people, I expect the best, not these people with baggage.

And I don't care right or left, nominees should be spotless
To be clear- she didn't spike trees...she testified in a case that got others charged with spiking trees.

I agree that nominees should be a good fit, no one is spotless.  IMO she is an improvement over Pendley, but maybe not 100% perfect.  I think she will be good for hunters though.

Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34512
  • Location: NE Corner
I don't give her a pass for spiking trees

With so many well qualified people, I expect the best, not these people with baggage.

And I don't care right or left, nominees should be spotless
To be clear- she didn't spike trees...she testified in a case that got others charged with spiking trees.

I agree that nominees should be a good fit, no one is spotless.  IMO she is an improvement over Pendley, but maybe not 100% perfect.  I think she will be good for hunters though.
Not going to argue as I can't do anything about it anyway, but I do hope you're right.


Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34512
  • Location: NE Corner
Federal taxes, and inflation

Offline ribka

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 5647
  • Location: E side
  • That's what she said
I agree with her politics so matter what crimes she committed I support and  anyways Trump is to blame. The leader at conservation NW is also a self admitted eco terrorist and I imagine Mitch is a close friend of hers as they were members in the same terrorist organization.

She has zero experience running and managing a large organization but her left wing radical politics makes her unquestionably qualified to manage our public lands. She could not even qualify for a basic background clearance because of her terrorist ties and that would exclude her from many entry level govt jobs. . This is such crazy logic but normal these days. Just like BHA leadership pushing gun bans to help back country hunters.

talk about cognitive dissonance.  :chuckle: :chuckle:


I’m not sure sending a letter on someone else’s behalf makes her a terrorist.

Maybe just an eco-terrorist sympathizer ?

It was probably forgivable 20 years ago....she was an undergrad at UM when all this went down in the late 80's... she's not exactly an eco terrorist.
« Last Edit: July 12, 2021, 10:17:12 AM by ribka »

Offline Platensek-po

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2018
  • Posts: 1521
  • Location: Shelton, wa
I agree with her politics so matter what crimes she committed I support and  anyways Trump is to blame. The leader at conservation NW is also a self admitted eco terrorist and I imagine Mitch is a close friend of hers as they were members in the same terrorist organization.

She has zero experience running and managing a large organization but her left wing radical politics makes her unquestionably qualified to manage our public lands. She could not even qualify for a basic background clearance because of her terrorist ties and that would exclude her from many entry level govt jobs. . This is such crazy logic but normal these days. Just like BHA leadership pushing gun bans to help back country hunters.

talk about cognitive dissonance.  :chuckle: :chuckle:


I’m not sure sending a letter on someone else’s behalf makes her a terrorist.

Maybe just an eco-terrorist sympathizer ?

It was probably forgivable 20 years ago....she was an undergrad at UM when all this went down in the late 80's... she's not exactly an eco terrorist.

Do you actually have evidence of BHA supporting gun bans? Would like to see that.
“Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary.”

If you are not willing to die for freedom then take the word out of your vocabulary.

Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34512
  • Location: NE Corner
BHA, or the leadership involved with BHA?

Offline Platensek-po

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2018
  • Posts: 1521
  • Location: Shelton, wa
BHA, or the leadership involved with BHA?

Either I guess. I would like to see what initiatives they have put forth or statements they have made to show they are against gun ownership.
“Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary.”

If you are not willing to die for freedom then take the word out of your vocabulary.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

LINCOLN !! by cryder
[Today at 08:16:43 AM]


Post rut Whitetail grunt call by Ridgeratt
[Today at 07:38:01 AM]


Thanksgiving duck hunt by ASHQUACK
[Today at 07:18:13 AM]


One of my Wowzhers by Schmalzfam
[Today at 07:16:38 AM]


2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by wadu1
[Today at 06:36:01 AM]


Fishing the East Cape in Baja? by Night goat
[Today at 04:34:41 AM]


Blue Tongue and EHD outbreak in NE Washington by hunter399
[Today at 04:34:22 AM]


121 Quality November 20-24 by hunter399
[Today at 04:19:14 AM]


What are you cooking? by EnglishSetter
[Today at 12:36:52 AM]


Shout out to bad-ss outdoor gear! by buglebuster
[Yesterday at 11:08:18 PM]


Real world feedback needed: Rangefinder Binos by teanawayslayer
[Yesterday at 10:25:19 PM]


Illinois, No Doubter by Birdguy
[Yesterday at 07:14:46 PM]


How to change email? by boneaddict
[Yesterday at 07:11:41 PM]


Late Alta Muzzy by Schmalzfam
[Yesterday at 05:10:16 PM]


Canning Wild Game by Whitpirate
[Yesterday at 04:24:26 PM]


Big old and heavy by Pathfinder101
[Yesterday at 02:32:30 PM]


Pepper Jack tillimook by Fidelk
[Yesterday at 02:30:19 PM]


What boots? by fishngamereaper
[Yesterday at 10:46:03 AM]


One-Day Approval!!! by pianoman9701
[Yesterday at 10:34:17 AM]


Wowzers by shotguunar
[Yesterday at 10:18:25 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal