collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: The person running the Bureau of Land Management Should Not be an Eco-Terrorist  (Read 6152 times)

Offline downtownbrown0610

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: May 2019
  • Posts: 75
  • Location: Pierce County, WA
  • Groups: MDF, FLRD
I was reading up on this whole thing the other day. I do not agree with this at all. It is also very unnerving to me the amount of people that are willing to look past something like this. I always give people the benefit of the doubt, but to me this is not ok. I am not one for discussing politics or partisan issues but you cant tell me this is the best person we could come up with!?!? Do I think that she honestly cares about the administering of federal lands and their proper use? yes probably. Do I think that there is another agenda at play? 100% absolutely. Give an inch and they will take a mile. We do not have many more inches to give......
First In Last Out!

Offline jstone

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2009
  • Posts: 6611
Talent= they can hire whoever they want qualified or not.

Offline WAcoyotehunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 4457
  • Location: Pend Oreille County
I don't give her a pass for spiking trees

With so many well qualified people, I expect the best, not these people with baggage.

And I don't care right or left, nominees should be spotless
To be clear- she didn't spike trees...she testified in a case that got others charged with spiking trees.

I agree that nominees should be a good fit, no one is spotless.  IMO she is an improvement over Pendley, but maybe not 100% perfect.  I think she will be good for hunters though.

Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34512
  • Location: NE Corner
I don't give her a pass for spiking trees

With so many well qualified people, I expect the best, not these people with baggage.

And I don't care right or left, nominees should be spotless
To be clear- she didn't spike trees...she testified in a case that got others charged with spiking trees.

I agree that nominees should be a good fit, no one is spotless.  IMO she is an improvement over Pendley, but maybe not 100% perfect.  I think she will be good for hunters though.
Not going to argue as I can't do anything about it anyway, but I do hope you're right.


Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34512
  • Location: NE Corner
Federal taxes, and inflation

Offline ribka

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 5647
  • Location: E side
  • That's what she said
I agree with her politics so matter what crimes she committed I support and  anyways Trump is to blame. The leader at conservation NW is also a self admitted eco terrorist and I imagine Mitch is a close friend of hers as they were members in the same terrorist organization.

She has zero experience running and managing a large organization but her left wing radical politics makes her unquestionably qualified to manage our public lands. She could not even qualify for a basic background clearance because of her terrorist ties and that would exclude her from many entry level govt jobs. . This is such crazy logic but normal these days. Just like BHA leadership pushing gun bans to help back country hunters.

talk about cognitive dissonance.  :chuckle: :chuckle:


I’m not sure sending a letter on someone else’s behalf makes her a terrorist.

Maybe just an eco-terrorist sympathizer ?

It was probably forgivable 20 years ago....she was an undergrad at UM when all this went down in the late 80's... she's not exactly an eco terrorist.
« Last Edit: July 12, 2021, 10:17:12 AM by ribka »

Offline Platensek-po

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2018
  • Posts: 1518
  • Location: Shelton, wa
I agree with her politics so matter what crimes she committed I support and  anyways Trump is to blame. The leader at conservation NW is also a self admitted eco terrorist and I imagine Mitch is a close friend of hers as they were members in the same terrorist organization.

She has zero experience running and managing a large organization but her left wing radical politics makes her unquestionably qualified to manage our public lands. She could not even qualify for a basic background clearance because of her terrorist ties and that would exclude her from many entry level govt jobs. . This is such crazy logic but normal these days. Just like BHA leadership pushing gun bans to help back country hunters.

talk about cognitive dissonance.  :chuckle: :chuckle:


I’m not sure sending a letter on someone else’s behalf makes her a terrorist.

Maybe just an eco-terrorist sympathizer ?

It was probably forgivable 20 years ago....she was an undergrad at UM when all this went down in the late 80's... she's not exactly an eco terrorist.

Do you actually have evidence of BHA supporting gun bans? Would like to see that.
“Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary.”

If you are not willing to die for freedom then take the word out of your vocabulary.

Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34512
  • Location: NE Corner
BHA, or the leadership involved with BHA?

Offline Platensek-po

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2018
  • Posts: 1518
  • Location: Shelton, wa
BHA, or the leadership involved with BHA?

Either I guess. I would like to see what initiatives they have put forth or statements they have made to show they are against gun ownership.
“Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary.”

If you are not willing to die for freedom then take the word out of your vocabulary.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Desert unit 290 October buck hunt by 92xj
[Today at 04:10:42 AM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by scottfrick
[Yesterday at 11:00:44 PM]


Anyone use game carts? by TitusFord
[Yesterday at 09:57:59 PM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by Seabass
[Yesterday at 09:46:33 PM]


FS Surbu BFG 50 by metlhead
[Yesterday at 09:14:18 PM]


Hancock/Manulife........No Trespassing signs everywhere! What's the deal. by hunter399
[Yesterday at 09:02:11 PM]


Share your out of state experience by Alan K
[Yesterday at 08:58:56 PM]


East Side by metlhead
[Yesterday at 08:56:20 PM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by Big6bull
[Yesterday at 08:50:37 PM]


Hunting w/ 30 rd magazine by Fidelk
[Yesterday at 07:32:22 PM]


Weyerhauser: St Helens - inscrutable? by ljsommer
[Yesterday at 07:28:25 PM]


2025 elk success thread!! by trophyhunt
[Yesterday at 06:22:40 PM]


Interview of Greg Jones about wolves by deer_hnter
[Yesterday at 04:54:26 PM]


Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal by Houndhunter
[Yesterday at 04:00:31 PM]


Flynn’s 1st rooster!!! by Forrestrover
[Yesterday at 11:11:07 AM]


Winthrop - Winter Range Road Closures by no.cen.wa
[Yesterday at 11:00:20 AM]


NAVY BEAN SOUP by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 10:50:59 AM]


Rabbit guts, feet heads for trapping bait by HighlandLofts
[Yesterday at 10:18:53 AM]


As He Lay by ganghis
[Yesterday at 09:28:02 AM]


Piebald blacktail fawn by highside74
[Yesterday at 09:26:27 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal