collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: e-bike on state land survey  (Read 33904 times)

Offline fireweed

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1307
  • Location: Toutle, Wa
e-bike on state land survey
« on: April 25, 2022, 08:20:13 AM »
https://wdfw.wa.gov/news/wdfw-dnr-seek-public-feedback-electric-assist-biking-state-managed-lands

Survey to kick off New rules for E-Bikes on WDFW/DNR land.

My main comment, look at EASEMENTS to public land, too, not just the land itself.  There are many DNR routes that pass through private land that go to public land.  Why couldn't E-Bikes be use on these routes??

Offline Westside88

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 1195
  • Location: Western Wa
Re: e-bike on state land survey
« Reply #1 on: April 25, 2022, 08:46:03 AM »
my  :twocents:, the bikes that are electric assist and meet the wattage threshold should be allowed. Public lands should be for everyone at all stages of life and these bikes won't harm a thing. I wouldn't support the type that are essentially electric motorcycles, but could see allowing them for handicapped access.

Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34512
  • Location: NE Corner
Re: e-bike on state land survey
« Reply #2 on: April 25, 2022, 09:22:14 AM »
Ebikes should have ORV stickers to help pay for, and only use trails designated for motorcycles or larger off road vehicles, with no wattage restrictions.

Offline CP

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 7211
  • Location: Mukilteo
Re: e-bike on state land survey
« Reply #3 on: April 25, 2022, 09:25:13 AM »
Just because it is a bike doesn't mean that it isn't a potential cause of fires.  Pedal bikes don't burst into flames when the batteries decide to "violently vent".

Same battery technology as cell phones, nav units, ear buds …

Offline HillHound

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2019
  • Posts: 1689
  • Location: Central Washington
  • Groups: NRA, RMEF
Re: e-bike on state land survey
« Reply #4 on: April 25, 2022, 09:29:08 AM »
Ebikes should have ORV stickers to help pay for, and only use trails designated for motorcycles or larger off road vehicles, with no wattage restrictions.
:yeah:

Offline HillHound

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2019
  • Posts: 1689
  • Location: Central Washington
  • Groups: NRA, RMEF
Re: e-bike on state land survey
« Reply #5 on: April 25, 2022, 09:33:02 AM »
I think the only application I would support for use in areas closed to motorize vehicles  is if it’s for handicap access. It definitely gives people an advantage much like a crossbow does during archery season So they should only be allowed in closed areas when that person shows that they have a medical reason to need that advantage

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 45318
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • Mortgage Licenses in WA, ID, & OR NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: e-bike on state land survey
« Reply #6 on: April 25, 2022, 09:36:58 AM »
I don't have an e-bike so no one should have one!

Just kidding. I don't care if someone uses an e-bike. Took the survey - allow them all.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

Offline CP

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 7211
  • Location: Mukilteo
Re: e-bike on state land survey
« Reply #7 on: April 25, 2022, 09:37:34 AM »
We need less restrictions on public land, not more.  There is no reason to ban ebikes.  What do they hurt?  Who do they harm?  Why does anyone care how hard it is to peddle a bicycle?

 



Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34512
  • Location: NE Corner
Re: e-bike on state land survey
« Reply #8 on: April 25, 2022, 09:37:51 AM »
Plenty of ORV trails for handicap to ride, with their ORV stickered ebike.

Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34512
  • Location: NE Corner
Re: e-bike on state land survey
« Reply #9 on: April 25, 2022, 09:41:56 AM »
We need less restrictions on public land, not more.  There is no reason to ban ebikes.  What do they hurt?  Who do they harm?  Why does anyone care how hard it is to peddle a bicycle?

This is just the beginning, ebikes are flooding the market and soon, they'll want to convert existing motorized trail systems to non-motorized, but ebike accessible.

Tbey should have to get ORV stickers and be plugged in as motorized vehicles (which they are) and get rid of all these stupid and often violated classes of ebikes.  If its got a battery and electric motor, ORV it!

This will ensure all these trail systems stay open to ORV activites and will provide a boost of much needed revenue to keep them maintained and open. 

Offline CP

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 7211
  • Location: Mukilteo
Re: e-bike on state land survey
« Reply #10 on: April 25, 2022, 09:44:47 AM »
We need less restrictions on public land, not more.  There is no reason to ban ebikes.  What do they hurt?  Who do they harm?  Why does anyone care how hard it is to peddle a bicycle?

This is just the beginning, ebikes are flooding the market and soon, they'll want to convert existing motorized trail systems to non-motorized but ebike accessible.

Tbey should have to get ORV stickers and be plugged in as motorized vehicles (which they are) and get ride of all these stupid and often violated classes of ebikes.  If its got a battery and electric motor, ORV it.  This will ensure all these trail systems stay open to ORV activites and will provide a boost of much needed revenue to keep them maintained and open.

ORV stickers should be eliminated for all vehicles. 

Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34512
  • Location: NE Corner
Re: e-bike on state land survey
« Reply #11 on: April 25, 2022, 09:45:52 AM »
Ok, how does the state pay for orv trails then?

Offline JimmyHoffa

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 14560
  • Location: 150 Years Too Late
Re: e-bike on state land survey
« Reply #12 on: April 25, 2022, 09:47:08 AM »
With the greenies wanting to reduce CO2, it would seem like the state would be encouraging more e-bikes on their land.

Offline CP

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 7211
  • Location: Mukilteo
Re: e-bike on state land survey
« Reply #13 on: April 25, 2022, 09:50:55 AM »
Ok, how does the state pay for orv trails then?

Maybe use the surplus from the 405 toll lanes?  The state has plenty of money but they are always looking for more ways to squeeze the public.  Everyone is looking for someone else to “pay their fair share”.

“Those guys over there have something that I don’t; They need to pay!”


Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34512
  • Location: NE Corner
Re: e-bike on state land survey
« Reply #14 on: April 25, 2022, 09:56:58 AM »
Ok, how does the state pay for orv trails then?

Maybe use the surplus from the 405 toll lanes?  The state has plenty of money but they are always looking for more ways to squeeze the public.  Everyone is looking for someone else to “pay their fair share”.

“Those guys over there have something that I don’t; They need to pay!”


There's even more people that want something for nothing  :twocents:

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Wall Tents Tips and Tricks by spin05
[Yesterday at 11:41:02 PM]


Blood trailing in the rain by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 11:23:07 PM]


The 33 year quest by RB
[Yesterday at 11:04:08 PM]


2025 elk success thread!! by pashok23
[Yesterday at 10:28:08 PM]


Flynn’s Hunts!!! by Tafinder
[Yesterday at 09:01:20 PM]


Another Mushroom we need ID on by RobinHoodlum
[Yesterday at 08:41:17 PM]


Mushroom ID by jrebel
[Yesterday at 07:57:13 PM]


GMU 368 Nasty Creek Rd Access (Gate) by Booner
[Yesterday at 07:03:22 PM]


2025 Montana alternate list by Britt-dog
[Yesterday at 06:57:14 PM]


Mt. St. Helens Goat by Caseknife
[Yesterday at 05:42:25 PM]


Skagit Question by lovetogrouse
[Yesterday at 05:40:00 PM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by Shrimper
[Yesterday at 04:14:10 PM]


Blue mountains deer permit by teanawayslayer
[Yesterday at 02:53:47 PM]


Getting the hang of hanging on to mallards! by JBG
[Yesterday at 09:33:34 AM]


A legend passed :( by Machias
[Yesterday at 09:26:39 AM]


Chinook run by buglebuster
[Yesterday at 08:39:03 AM]


King of the mountain caught sleeping by TeacherMan
[Yesterday at 08:22:47 AM]


GM 6.6l gas 6 speed vs. 10 speed? by HntnFsh
[Yesterday at 07:11:37 AM]


Anyone own a Hewescraft Sportsman 160? by FlyFish360
[Yesterday at 06:48:21 AM]


How much do you think my truck is worth? by FlyFish360
[Yesterday at 02:06:54 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal