collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Public Comment Open on NPS & USF&W Plan to Restore Grizzly in North Cascades  (Read 6070 times)

Offline GOcougsHunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 601
  • Location: West Side and East Side
  • Groups: MHPP, MHAG, HEI, RMEF, DU, USVEMG
Re: Public Comment Open on NPS & USF&W Plan to Restore Grizzly in North Cascades
« Reply #15 on: September 29, 2023, 03:17:19 PM »
Correct me if I am wrong, but I recall the original reason for the enviro's wanted them gone was because they were eating some plant life that was on the Endangered list.  And beings that "sportsman" had them put there, they were/are not considered a "native species".  Hence their original desire was for them(the goats) to be shot and left lay.  That incurred out cry from people, so the alternative was to relocate them at taxpayers expense.  The sportsman tried to get a permit hunt going BUT you know what can of worms that stirred up!!
  Wasn't the enviros... https://www.nps.gov/olym/planyourvisit/mountain-goat-capture-and-translocation.htm  has all the detail.  National Parks are set up under the Preservationist model (think John Muir) and introduced species are not part of a preservationist Federal mandate for the NPS.  This mandate was put in place by Teddy Roosevelt's administration,
Introduce someone new to hunting this year.

Offline Knocker of rocks

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 8832
  • Location: the Holocene, man
Re: Public Comment Open on NPS & USF&W Plan to Restore Grizzly in North Cascades
« Reply #16 on: September 29, 2023, 04:59:40 PM »
Correct me if I am wrong, but I recall the original reason for the enviro's wanted them gone was because they were eating some plant life that was on the Endangered list.  And beings that "sportsman" had them put there, they were/are not considered a "native species".  Hence their original desire was for them(the goats) to be shot and left lay.  That incurred out cry from people, so the alternative was to relocate them at taxpayers expense.  The sportsman tried to get a permit hunt going BUT you know what can of worms that stirred up!!
  Wasn't the enviros... https://www.nps.gov/olym/planyourvisit/mountain-goat-capture-and-translocation.htm  has all the detail.  National Parks are set up under the Preservationist model (think John Muir) and introduced species are not part of a preservationist Federal mandate for the NPS.  This mandate was put in place by Teddy Roosevelt's administration,

Something similar is starting to occur in the TR NP. The question is becoming what is a cultural/historical number versus the environmental damage or hard hooved introduced species


https://www.federaltimes.com/federal-oversight/2023/09/27/national-park-service-seeks-public-input-on-wild-horses/#:~:text=Around%201970%2C%20a%20park%20superintendent,the%20open%2Drange%20ranching%20era.

Offline BearCreekCookBook

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Jul 2017
  • Posts: 83
  • Location: NW
Re: Public Comment Open on NPS & USF&W Plan to Restore Grizzly in North Cascades
« Reply #17 on: September 29, 2023, 06:37:43 PM »
These people are shameless. This has been proposed so many times I have lost count.

1) The historical population is irrelevant to modern day, we have over 8 million people in this state and thousands of miles of highways.

2) We don’t have the prey populations for the current predators, never mind adding a new apex predator.

3) BC is full of grizzly and they can no longer be hunted, they’ll move in slowly and naturally should the habitat and prey ever be healthy enough to sustain a population.

4) The people of Washington have already resoundingly rejected this proposal, trying to force it down our throats every year is truly pathetic.

I hope the people trying to push this are mauled and eaten slowly by a big nasty boar grizz, it would serve them right.

Online RB

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 2989
  • Location: Arlington, washington
Re: Public Comment Open on NPS & USF&W Plan to Restore Grizzly in North Cascades
« Reply #18 on: September 29, 2023, 10:18:52 PM »
Have a friend that did high Buck this year near this area they want to put Grizzly. He said the trail, and off trail areas he went had a lot of hikers. One group stopped and talked with him and asked what he was doing, he replied hunting Deer and Bear. What happened next is what is very concerning, they all asked "There are Bears up here?"

The worst part I feel is the wasted tax dollars that will get used to "re-locate" Bears, because my opinion is, they will take problem Bears from Montana and Wyoming and release them here. More tax dollars will be wasted trying to educate the Bear, after it starts to eat livestock, then more will be wasted to bring in a government hunter and finally put it down. Then the cycle will start over.  :twocents:
IAFF #3728

Offline Boss .300 winmag

  • FLY NAVAL AVIATION
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+23)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 18885
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • How do you measure trying, you do, or you don’t.
Re: Public Comment Open on NPS & USF&W Plan to Restore Grizzly in North Cascades
« Reply #19 on: September 29, 2023, 10:26:18 PM »
Have a friend that did high Buck this year near this area they want to put Grizzly. He said the trail, and off trail areas he went had a lot of hikers. One group stopped and talked with him and asked what he was doing, he replied hunting Deer and Bear. What happened next is what is very concerning, they all asked "There are Bears up here?"

The worst part I feel is the wasted tax dollars that will get used to "re-locate" Bears, because my opinion is, they will take problem Bears from Montana and Wyoming and release them here. More tax dollars will be wasted trying to educate the Bear, after it starts to eat livestock, then more will be wasted to bring in a government hunter and finally put it down. Then the cycle will start over.  :twocents:

Bunny huggers have not a clue what’s in the forest until they see it.🤣
"Just because I like granola, and I have stretched my arms around a few trees, doesn't mean I'm a tree hugger!
Hi I'm 8156, our leader is Bearpaw.
YOU CANNOT REASON WITH A TIGER WHEN YOUR HEAD IS IN ITS MOUTH! Winston Churchill

Keep Calm And Duc/Ski Doo On!

Offline SWHUNTER

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 436
Re: Public Comment Open on NPS & USF&W Plan to Restore Grizzly in North Cascades
« Reply #20 on: September 30, 2023, 02:17:45 AM »
Sent my comment in. No Action Alternative. Too many people in the woods and that number of people is growing every year. It wouldn't be good for hikers, hunters, climbers, skiers, or the bears. For some reason I keep thinking Western Pasayten will be were they dump them.
Send a comment!

Offline Washington Wapiti

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Sep 2017
  • Posts: 42
  • Location: Concrete
  • Groups: NRA, RMEF, MDF, NWTF
Hell I’m all for it. I think releasing a few on Tiger Summit is a good idea as well. The woods have had an issue with an invasive species know as liberals for decades now. This might be just what we need for them to give the hunters some space and for them to see first hand how dumb their ideas are.

I approve this message  :chuckle:
The only time I've hugged a tree was to hang a treestand.

Offline MADMAX

  • Trade Count: (+23)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 9379
  • Location: Kitsap/Cle Elum
  • I like big bucks and I can not lie
Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
Mark Twain


I Ain't Captain Walker.
I'm The Guy Who Carries Mr. Dead In His Pocket


What would life be without the thrill of the hunt ?

Offline jackelope

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+29)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50348
  • Location: Duvall, WA
  • Groups: jackelope
Correct me if I am wrong, but I recall the original reason for the enviro's wanted them gone was because they were eating some plant life that was on the Endangered list.  And beings that "sportsman" had them put there, they were/are not considered a "native species".  Hence their original desire was for them(the goats) to be shot and left lay.  That incurred out cry from people, so the alternative was to relocate them at taxpayers expense.  The sportsman tried to get a permit hunt going BUT you know what can of worms that stirred up!!

An introduced species decimating natural/native plant life.

Special permit hunts came first. Didn’t work.

Aerial net gunning to remove as many as possible and relocate by X date.

Anything left beyond that were shot.  Hunters/shooters applied to be teams of shooters to go into the goat areas and shoot as many as they could. They weren’t instructed to leave them lay. They were told they could bring the meat out if they wanted to, but they didn’t have to. They didn’t kill all of them and they’ll presumably repopulate themselves at some point in the future.
:fire.:

" In today's instant gratification society, more and more pressure revolves around success and the measurement of one's prowess as a hunter by inches on a score chart or field photos produced on social media. Don't fall into the trap. Hunting is-and always will be- about the hunt, the adventure, the views, and time spent with close friends and family. " Ryan Hatfield

My posts, opinions and statements do not represent those of this forum

Offline 85yota

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2020
  • Posts: 471
  • Location: Wetside
Correct me if I am wrong, but I recall the original reason for the enviro's wanted them gone was because they were eating some plant life that was on the Endangered list.  And beings that "sportsman" had them put there, they were/are not considered a "native species".  Hence their original desire was for them(the goats) to be shot and left lay.  That incurred out cry from people, so the alternative was to relocate them at taxpayers expense.  The sportsman tried to get a permit hunt going BUT you know what can of worms that stirred up!!

An introduced species decimating natural/native plant life.

Special permit hunts came first. Didn’t work.

Aerial net gunning to remove as many as possible and relocate by X date.

Anything left beyond that were shot.  Hunters/shooters applied to be teams of shooters to go into the goat areas and shoot as many as they could. They weren’t instructed to leave them lay. They were told they could bring the meat out if they wanted to, but they didn’t have to. They didn’t kill all of them and they’ll presumably repopulate themselves at some point in the future.

Now I could be wrong here but when I applied I though I remember them having a limit on how many animals could be removed (actually packed out). And that the area was so steep they warned/ discouraged removal of animals in most instances. Basically your job is to kill goats, we dont want you repelling down ridges or risking injury.There was also the issue of packing animals out in view of the public, ( they may have decided to close trails).  What I also do remember was them being super strick on social media usage, posting pictures etc. I'm guessing this is why there very limited info on how the hunt actually went.  Gag order of sorts

Offline timberfaller

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2014
  • Posts: 4179
  • Location: East Wenatchee
 :tup: jackelope!
The only good tree, is a stump!

Offline O. Nerka

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Nov 2018
  • Posts: 90
  • Location: Winthrop, WA


Correct me if I am wrong, but I recall the original reason for the enviro's wanted them gone was because they were eating some plant life that was on the Endangered list.  And beings that "sportsman" had them put there, they were/are not considered a "native species".  Hence their original desire was for them(the goats) to be shot and left lay.  That incurred out cry from people, so the alternative was to relocate them at taxpayers expense.  The sportsman tried to get a permit hunt going BUT you know what can of worms that stirred up!!

An introduced species decimating natural/native plant life.

Special permit hunts came first. Didn’t work.

Aerial net gunning to remove as many as possible and relocate by X date.

Anything left beyond that were shot.  Hunters/shooters applied to be teams of shooters to go into the goat areas and shoot as many as they could. They weren’t instructed to leave them lay. They were told they could bring the meat out if they wanted to, but they didn’t have to. They didn’t kill all of them and they’ll presumably repopulate themselves at some point in the future.

Now I could be wrong here but when I applied I though I remember them having a limit on how many animals could be removed (actually packed out). And that the area was so steep they warned/ discouraged removal of animals in most instances. Basically your job is to kill goats, we dont want you repelling down ridges or risking injury.There was also the issue of packing animals out in view of the public, ( they may have decided to close trails).  What I also do remember was them being super strick on social media usage, posting pictures etc. I'm guessing this is why there very limited info on how the hunt actually went.  Gag order of sorts

The NPS did emphasize safety but allowed groups to take out as much as they wanted at least in the 2nd "season".  There were no trails closed for the volunteer groups and if I remember correctly about 30-35 total goats were killed in all hunts in 2020.

I participated in the hunt and was quite impressed with the NPS biologist that led the effort. She was easy to communicate with, quick to adapt as needed and was happy to share as much goat info as possible.

And for clarification the first step was relocations, then volunteer hunters and after that was the aerial gunning.

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25043
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Previous discussion when they tried this in 2017

https://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,207433.0.html
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline fireweed

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1307
  • Location: Toutle, Wa
I submitted some comments from the "bear's" perspective, thinking maybe there might be an angle they haven't considered.  They are plucking younger, loner bears from high density bear areas (like Yellowstone Ecosystem) and dropping them in the late summer/fall into a totally new habitat.  How will they find food? The North Cascade isn't a super rich ecosystem, especially when talking protein on the hoof.  What about all the documentaries on Yellowstone bears that tout the unique food sources that bears learn from their mothers (like moths in high mountains, and spawning cutthroat trout).  These dropped in bears will be lost, hungry, disoriented and probably especially dangerous to humans.  The EIS says they will be released near berries!  What if there are no huckleberries that year--it happens all the time.  Even the black bears get nasty and brave during bad berry years.  The N. Cascades doesn't have the elk calves to chew on like Yellowstone.  Transplanting grizzlies is just another Park Service Disaster (like Night of the Grizzlies) just waiting to happen.  Check out book Engineering Eden that tell how park service zeal to make everything natural too quickly (by closing the garbage dumps when bears still relied on them for food) lead to the deaths of two people via separate bear mauling on the same night.  Google it

Offline Boss .300 winmag

  • FLY NAVAL AVIATION
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+23)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 18885
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • How do you measure trying, you do, or you don’t.
I submitted some comments from the "bear's" perspective, thinking maybe there might be an angle they haven't considered.  They are plucking younger, loner bears from high density bear areas (like Yellowstone Ecosystem) and dropping them in the late summer/fall into a totally new habitat.  How will they find food? The North Cascade isn't a super rich ecosystem, especially when talking protein on the hoof.  What about all the documentaries on Yellowstone bears that tout the unique food sources that bears learn from their mothers (like moths in high mountains, and spawning cutthroat trout).  These dropped in bears will be lost, hungry, disoriented and probably especially dangerous to humans.  The EIS says they will be released near berries!  What if there are no huckleberries that year--it happens all the time.  Even the black bears get nasty and brave during bad berry years.  The N. Cascades doesn't have the elk calves to chew on like Yellowstone.  Transplanting grizzlies is just another Park Service Disaster (like Night of the Grizzlies) just waiting to happen.  Check out book Engineering Eden that tell how park service zeal to make everything natural too quickly (by closing the garbage dumps when bears still relied on them for food) lead to the deaths of two people via separate bear mauling on the same night.  Google it

Spot on .👍

The berries this year failed due to a drought in the mountains, plus high temps earlier in the spring causing poor berry crop.

Grizzlies already live in the north Cascades, let them repopulate on their own.  :twocents:
"Just because I like granola, and I have stretched my arms around a few trees, doesn't mean I'm a tree hugger!
Hi I'm 8156, our leader is Bearpaw.
YOU CANNOT REASON WITH A TIGER WHEN YOUR HEAD IS IN ITS MOUTH! Winston Churchill

Keep Calm And Duc/Ski Doo On!

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

2025 Area 9 King Opener by RB
[Today at 04:20:45 PM]


Please Comment on new Game management Plan, RE Furbearers by redi
[Today at 04:13:27 PM]


AKC lab puppies! Born 06/10/2025 follow as they grow!!! by scottfrick
[Today at 01:58:13 PM]


William o Douglas lakes by trophyhunt
[Today at 01:45:17 PM]


Pre season Archery SALE by BigJs Outdoor Store
[Today at 12:39:09 PM]


Cell cam recommendation for security? by birdshooter1189
[Today at 12:08:32 PM]


If this is your trap by CasterlyRock
[Today at 11:50:02 AM]


2024 DFW Wolf report by throttlejocky20
[Today at 09:52:55 AM]


Livestock near 49 degrees north? by hunter399
[Today at 09:50:15 AM]


WA Moose scouting by hunter399
[Today at 09:46:20 AM]


JBLM Archery by WapitiTalk1
[Today at 09:08:57 AM]


JBLM by Carwash
[Yesterday at 10:08:39 PM]


Looking for Solid 22 LR input by run870
[Yesterday at 09:15:50 PM]


Teanaway bull elk by Stein
[Yesterday at 09:14:42 PM]


49 Degrees North Early Bull Moose by Vandal44
[Yesterday at 07:10:03 PM]


3 days for Kings by Parasite
[Yesterday at 07:02:37 PM]


I'm Going To Need Karl To Come up With That 290 Muley Sunscreen Bug Spray Combo by dvolmer
[Yesterday at 06:30:50 PM]


Raffle ticket sales 2025 by greenhead_killer
[Yesterday at 06:18:45 PM]


Yakima bow shop by maxwell
[Yesterday at 05:41:04 PM]


2025 Montana alternate list by Sakko300wsm
[Yesterday at 03:55:08 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal