How bout this big blacktail too

[Skyvalhunter]

jackelope did you have to ride him the full 7 seconds??

[addicted]

jackelope did you have to ride him the full 7 seconds??

its tougher with the mexican rules cuz you arent aloud to grab the ears

[jackelope]

jackelope did you have to ride him the full 7 seconds??

8 seconds. i'm a *censored* on those buckin bunnies.
7 seconds is for amatures.

[DeKuma]

And here I'm thinking that is a whole lota bunny meat in the freezer.   

[boneaddict]

Well archery 288, I hope you aren't BSing, because it would be the first time on this site, and I am going to be niave enough to take you for your word.  I would hate for this place to turn out like MM.  Congrats on your picture of one of the most incredible blackies that is roaming around out there.  I hope to see his sheds on here in about 2 months with either your name or mine attached to it. ; )

[huntnphool]

Just go get some more pics, I would love to see more shots of that toad anyway. Or you can take me and I will take some pics of him

[Chesapeake]

I dont know that it helps the situation, but I have seen the seccond pic and most likely the first pic on another chat board. I'm fairly sure a user on that board had made the claim that he took the pictures himself.

Maybe Archery288 is the same guy, but I think maybe not because he doest seem to claim the seccond pic, and his location isnt correct. Maybe the guy moved.

Here is a third pic to fuel the fire. Seems this buck loves the spotlight.

[Houndhunter]

i dont know about this it just dont seem right (the first pic). i mean look at his body, i know it could be the angle, but its way to short and his eyes are all screwed up. just look closely at his back shoulders compared to the rest of his body, it dont match up right. my .02 is that this is clearly a 100% fake photo

[jackelope]

all 3 of them of 3 different angles?? all fake photos ? i think the question is when and where the pics were taken, not wether or not they're fake.

[addicted]

all pictures seem to be of the same quality and the same quality as bigfoot pictures.

 even if someone has gone amiss in their claims there is no need to go for the throat. we're all buds on here and a big fish story is no reason to get all riled up.  

[Chesapeake]

I'm going to go out on a limb here and make the claim that all 3 pics so far are of the same buck.

All three deer have the same extra main on the left side. They all have the same odd extra point off the front of the right main beam. All three pics have the same background of firns, and the tree trunk in the background looks to be the same in all three photo's. Also all three photo's have the same grainy appearance.

I think the difference in point sizes between the 1st and 2nd, and 3rd photos is just an optical illusion caused by the angle. I think we are seeing the tip of a back tine, and the front tine is hidden behind another causing it to look like he only has sticker points.

The fact that Archery288 doesnt lay claim to all three photo's makes me think BS on his claim to have taken the first photo.

I originaly saw thes pictures on line some 3 or 4 years ago. They are likely real and not photoshop.

Of course I've bean wrong before.

[jackelope]

photobucket details of the pic billy posted...

Photo Description   

File Name: post-64-1111720416-1.jpg (rename)
 

 .jpg  cancel  Taken With: unknown
File Size: 88 kb - 540x360 Taken On: 2005:03:24 19:05:27
Orientation: 1 X Resolution: 90/1
Y Resolution: 90/1 Resolution Unit: 2
Software: Adobe Photoshop Elements 2.0 Date Time: 2005:03:24 19:05:27
Exif IFD Pointer: 164 Color Space: 65535
Exif Image Width: 540 Exif Image Length: 360

and of the pics that chesapeake posted...

Photo Description   

File Name: 414316.jpg (rename)
 

 .jpg  cancel  Taken With: unknown
File Size: 59 kb - 263x296 Taken On: 2006:10:01 19:38:03
X Resolution: 5669/1 Y Resolution: 5669/1
Resolution Unit: 2 Software: Paint Shop Photo Album v5.21
Date Time: 2006:10:01 19:38:03 Y Cb Cr Positioning: 2
Exif IFD Pointer: 164 Exif Version: 0220
Components Configuration:
 User Comment: LEAD Technologies Inc. V1.01
Flash Pix Version: 0100 Color Space: 1
Exif Image Width: 263 Exif Image Length: 296
Interoperability Offset: 294

the first pic archery288 posted will not list the details for whatever reason. the date taken of thepic's listed is a ways apart, but i think if the pic was modified like in photoshop or something it will change the date it was taken. either way, the pic's were taken over a year ago.

[Chesapeake]

OK I've figured it out, atleast in my mind.

Never mind the deer. Look at the limb sticking up at a 45 in the bottom of the pics. Its in all three, and has the same split in the broken end on all three.

Same Deer, Same Day, Same Location, all three pics.

Someone is tellin fibs!!!!

[jackelope]

OK I've figured it out, atleast in my mind.

my mind too.

[billythekidrock]

to bad I have already seen those pics previously in years past! but thanks though for trying to make it seem like a photoshop and a fake! Guess I will have to go find his sheds and archery hunt him next year as I tried in the early season this year! look at the spread from the two, the pic posted "of him" his spread isn't near what it is now

And has anyone heard of genetics?? freaky horn characteristics carry on to its off-spring as well! Just like some of the bulls my party has taken over the past few years where we hunt, off both the 4th points on each side there is a 5 to 8 inch kicker! and have seen numerous bulls with that same feature! has to be the off-spring!

Hey Billy, Cowboy and Sky, did you look closely at the right side or the deer's left? Look again and compare the two. The photo that archery288 posted is obviously an older buck he is wider and a little, I say little bit heavier but on that left side those that were once little stickers are now actually points! It is not taken in the same season.
What is it with you guys? So somebody on Ifish can photo this buck but archery288 can't? Look just this week two elk that I have seen before have ended up in photo's on this site, so it's not impossible.
This may not prove it's not a fake but come up with more solid proof than just a jealous opinion, otherwise we have no reason not to believe him.

Ok smart asses...then why do I have the same exact photo saved as well? I copied both of these from iFish from the said thread. I have no doubt it is real and if I remember right it was near someones property. Yes, I have compared the photos numerous times they are not faked and it is the same deer/same day or year.