collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: The new 2008 harvest report for elk is out  (Read 6624 times)

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32939
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: The new 2008 harvest report for elk is out
« Reply #15 on: August 17, 2009, 06:26:28 PM »
Or they didnt draw there eastside bull tag and went to idaho.

Or like me, Montana. ;)

It was only a guess on my part buckmark, I really don't know.

Armadillo, it only shows by GMU in special permits, some people in general hunt more than one GMU in a season.
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline Ghost Hunter

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 5418
  • Location: SW <-> NE
  • Groups: NRA Patron Life Member, RMEF Life, Sponser Member
Re: The new 2008 harvest report for elk is out
« Reply #16 on: August 17, 2009, 06:37:05 PM »
Gonna have to print it out and spread it out to figure it out :dunno: :chuckle:
Economy failure = Too many people spending money they don't have on things they don't need to impress people they don't like.

Offline Armadillo

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 1150
  • Location: Monroe
Re: The new 2008 harvest report for elk is out
« Reply #17 on: August 17, 2009, 06:48:05 PM »
Oh ok thanks
Growing old is mandatory, growing up is optional

Offline bowkid

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 47
  • Location: La Center, WA
Re: The new 2008 harvest report for elk is out
« Reply #18 on: August 17, 2009, 09:11:10 PM »
Thanks for the post, was wondering if was going to get out this year.

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39214
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: The new 2008 harvest report for elk is out
« Reply #19 on: August 17, 2009, 09:26:25 PM »
Here is the link for number of hunters for 2007 by gmu.
Add about 10% for 2008.

http://wdfw.wa.gov/wlm/game/harvest/2007/db/elk_all.php

Well that sucks if we're never going to have that information again and all we can do is look at the 2007 data. So in 2020 how close will the hunter numbers be? Still just have to add 10%?

So is there no way to get success rates for any of the general seasons?  I do like having the data for number of antler points but not having hunter numbers or success rates blows!   :bash:

Offline rudedawg1085

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 254
  • Location: Kent, wa
Re: The new 2008 harvest report for elk is out
« Reply #20 on: August 17, 2009, 09:30:28 PM »
im surprised on how many big elk, or elk in general were shot in puyallup and issaquah, iv lived in those areas my whole life and honestly i dont think iv ever seen an elk...all private land near hobart im thinking??????
“I have not failed. I’ve just found 10,000 ways that won’t work.”

Thomas Edison

Offline Matt

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 360
  • Location: Oak Harbor
Re: The new 2008 harvest report for elk is out
« Reply #21 on: August 18, 2009, 07:02:20 AM »
Here is how messed up that is.  There are only 14 permits for elk multiple weapons.  14 animals were taken, that's 100%.  But it says that there were 48 hunters and the success rate was only 29%.  How can there only be 14 permits but 48 hunters?????????????? :dunno:
USN Ret. Chief
Bow Only

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39214
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: The new 2008 harvest report for elk is out
« Reply #22 on: August 18, 2009, 07:12:24 AM »
The multiple-season elk permits had 1500 permits, or something like that. A heck of a lot more than 14 anyway. Or are you talking about multiple-season permit holders that hunted a specific unit ???

Offline Matt

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 360
  • Location: Oak Harbor
Re: The new 2008 harvest report for elk is out
« Reply #23 on: August 18, 2009, 07:30:21 AM »
The multiple-season elk permits had 1500 permits, or something like that. A heck of a lot more than 14 anyway. Or are you talking about multiple-season permit holders that hunted a specific unit ???

I am talking Multiple Weapon as it states in the report.  I don't think that there was 1500 multi-season permits issued was there?  Actually I just went back and looked in another area and it stated 48 permits.  So I'll cut em some slack.
USN Ret. Chief
Bow Only

Offline cackle

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 647
  • Location: snatches
Re: The new 2008 harvest report for elk is out
« Reply #24 on: August 18, 2009, 07:33:52 AM »
I think the numers ar skewed by hunters thart say they bought a tag and didnt hunt because its easier I know alot of people that hunt and kill animals and report that they didnt hunt at all
If you cant fix it with a hammer you got an electrical problem

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39214
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: The new 2008 harvest report for elk is out
« Reply #25 on: August 18, 2009, 08:25:28 AM »
The multiple-season elk permits had 1500 permits, or something like that. A heck of a lot more than 14 anyway. Or are you talking about multiple-season permit holders that hunted a specific unit ???

I am talking Multiple Weapon as it states in the report.  I don't think that there was 1500 multi-season permits issued was there?  Actually I just went back and looked in another area and it stated 48 permits.  So I'll cut em some slack.

You're right, it wasn't 1500. I just looked it up... there were 500 multiple-season elk permits. But that's still a lot more than 14, or 48.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

2025 deer, let's see em! by muleyslayer
[Today at 11:01:39 AM]


Cougar and an elk same pic/video by Crunchy
[Today at 10:56:38 AM]


Hancock/Manulife........No Trespassing signs everywhere! What's the deal. by Twispriver
[Today at 10:15:23 AM]


Hunting w/ 30 rd magazine by Timberstalker
[Today at 10:01:34 AM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by 2MANY
[Today at 09:00:29 AM]


Big buck, bad eye by 2MANY
[Today at 08:59:17 AM]


CITES hide sealer and Fur Harvesters Receiving Agent info Pt 1 by Loup Loup
[Today at 08:35:28 AM]


Color phase fox by Loup Loup
[Today at 08:32:56 AM]


Mt. St. Helens Goat by fishngamereaper
[Today at 08:19:02 AM]


GM 6.6l gas 6 speed vs. 10 speed? by fishngamereaper
[Today at 08:18:03 AM]


re-barreling a gun by Wingin it
[Today at 06:52:34 AM]


Looking for Taxidermist Recommendations by Wingin it
[Today at 06:45:11 AM]


Possible record bull? by trophyhunt
[Today at 06:44:10 AM]


Entiat Modern hunting by vandeman17
[Today at 06:42:15 AM]


My new BB Gun by FlyFish360
[Today at 03:09:02 AM]


Let’s see ur heavy pack out pics by Berner5
[Yesterday at 09:18:43 PM]


Research Request - Deer, Moose & Elk Samples by cjc23
[Yesterday at 09:09:08 PM]


We lost one of our own (Colockumelk) by cem3434
[Yesterday at 08:46:12 PM]


Found tripod by royalbull
[Yesterday at 06:49:42 PM]


2025 Deer season/hunter399 by bb76
[Yesterday at 06:10:17 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal