collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: why no scopes?  (Read 9055 times)

Offline bankwalker

  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 2513
  • Location: Matlock
why no scopes?
« on: November 03, 2009, 10:16:11 PM »
can you use scopes on muzzleloaders in washington? i have seen alot of pics with people and thier ML kills, but never any guns with scopes.


Offline carpsniperg2

  • Site Sponsor
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+126)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 31528
  • Location: Goldendale,WA
Re: why no scopes?
« Reply #1 on: November 03, 2009, 10:18:47 PM »
no not legal at all unless you visually impared and get a disabled card for it.
Owner: SPLIT DIAMOND TACTICAL
Firearms/Transfers/Parts/Optics
2011 HW Head Competition Winner

Offline rasbo

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 20144
  • Location: Grant county
  • In God I trust...Try taking that away from me!
Re: why no scopes?
« Reply #2 on: November 04, 2009, 04:21:42 AM »
Im glad we cant have scopes on muzzies.

Offline Whitelightning

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 501
  • Location: Lake Stevens
  • Hey Yogi
Re: why no scopes?
« Reply #3 on: November 04, 2009, 06:17:48 AM »
No scopes, but I have converted most of my M/L's to Peep site. My eye's are not what they used to be and the peep helps me alot.
Smoke em when ya see em!

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50475
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: why no scopes?
« Reply #4 on: November 04, 2009, 06:19:33 AM »
Supposed to be primitive

Online lewy

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 3890
  • Location: buckley
  • IBEW RMEF WSTA WCO NRA
Re: why no scopes?
« Reply #5 on: November 04, 2009, 06:21:59 AM »
I understand the whole traditional argument, exposed breech, etc. But a scope inst going to help your muzzy go off in the rain, so why not allow it- i think it would allow for more accurate shots, cleaner kills, and less loss game. For the people that don't like the idea, they can leave there peeps on..... :twocents:
Go hawks

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39203
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: why no scopes?
« Reply #6 on: November 04, 2009, 06:24:36 AM »
If someone wants to hunt with a scope they just need to hunt the modern firearm season. Simple as that.

Offline GoldTip

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 4588
  • Location: Spokane, WA
Re: why no scopes?
« Reply #7 on: November 04, 2009, 06:51:32 AM »
I know several guys who use the scopes due to vision disabilities.  They actually say they're not sure it is an asset, but they can't see without them.  I agree, it should remain primitive, but I do like that they have changed the ruling to allow it for guys who's eyesight is degradd to the point the would have to give up Muzzy hunting without them.
I didn't say it was your fault, I said I was blaming you.
If I ageed with you, then we'd both be wrong.
You are never to old to learn something stupid.

Offline Wacenturion

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (-1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 6040
Re: why no scopes?
« Reply #8 on: November 04, 2009, 08:22:21 AM »
I understand the whole traditional argument, exposed breech, etc. But a scope inst going to help your muzzy go off in the rain, so why not allow it- i think it would allow for more accurate shots, cleaner kills, and less loss game. For the people that don't like the idea, they can leave there peeps on..... :twocents:

I can certainly understand your point of view.....and for those who disagree, you don't have to be visibly impaired to not see down a unscoped barrel without problems.  Just wait till some of you need glasses with bifocals...you cannot see the front and rear together in clarity.
"About the time you realize that your father was a smart man, you have a teenager telling you just how stupid you are."

Offline whacker1

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 5816
  • Location: Spokane
Re: why no scopes?
« Reply #9 on: November 04, 2009, 08:44:58 AM »
scopes would allow for cleaner shot at close range, but they would also allow folks to feel more comfortable with shots at longer range, which would in turn provide for poor shot placement. 

I target shot with scope on mine to determine which bullet was the most accurate, and then went back to a peep sight for hunting.  you definitely can shoot farther with the scope, but I can see myself taking shots outside the capacity of the muzzleloader.  Better to go with out the scope

Offline Whitelightning

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 501
  • Location: Lake Stevens
  • Hey Yogi
Re: why no scopes?
« Reply #10 on: November 04, 2009, 08:14:27 PM »
Scopes have been around for a Long time, not in the fashion we have today. I think saying scopes are not primitive is arguable. I am not saying they should be aloud however.
The inline was invented in 1812 by Pauley also. Seems kind of primitive too.
Smoke em when ya see em!

Offline carpsniperg2

  • Site Sponsor
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+126)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 31528
  • Location: Goldendale,WA
Re: why no scopes?
« Reply #11 on: November 04, 2009, 08:21:45 PM »
i use peep sights on both of mine and shoot both of them very well. there are people on here that can shoot great at 200 yards with them  but i am fine at 100-125
Owner: SPLIT DIAMOND TACTICAL
Firearms/Transfers/Parts/Optics
2011 HW Head Competition Winner

Offline ribka

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 5647
  • Location: E side
  • That's what she said
Re: why no scopes?
« Reply #12 on: November 04, 2009, 08:31:53 PM »
Primitive= good

Too many states that I have ml/archery hunted in started years ago with primitive weapons' rules
Over the years any states incrementally allowed  changes in regs: scopes, closed breech etc.. Soon no difference than single shot modern rifle.
I am in my mid 40's and eye sight is changing still would stick with same primitive rules.

Same with archery season. Used to be no crossbows. Now with the advancement of archery technology and strong lobby by cross bow makers has resulted in many states no allowing crossbows in regular archery season.

A few people want to argue that less loss of game with allowance of more modern technology in archery and ml. Why not just cancel those seasons and mandate modern firearms with 30 cal. or more rifles?

Over the years, based on my opinion, people's lack of basic hunting skills, ( scouting, hiking away from the access areas ( roads) , no tracking skills, stalking skills,) and  plain laziness has resulted in the allowance of more modern technology during supposed primitive seasons.
Keep it primitive in WA. ID has the same rules. If you don't agree switch to modern firearms
 :twocents:

Offline bankwalker

  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 2513
  • Location: Matlock
Re: why no scopes?
« Reply #13 on: November 05, 2009, 04:37:35 PM »
ive always wanted to hunt muzzleloader, but i cant shoot open sights. having very poor vision, i cant make out the sights. so a scope is needed. plus the frame of my glasses if very small so i see the sights in the upper corner of my eyes, outside the frame.

its cheaper for my to buy a muzzlerloader with a scope then it is to buy new glasses  :chuckle:

yes my eyes are that bad, the cheapest anywhere will make lenses for me is $250.  :bash: right now im walking around with super glue on my lenses cause i cant afford new ones  :chuckle:


Offline jstone

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2009
  • Posts: 6565
Re: why no scopes?
« Reply #14 on: November 06, 2009, 09:16:57 AM »
Should keep it as primitive as can be. If we have them with scopes and shoot hundreds of yards why have a muzzy season

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Range finders & Angle Compensation by Stein
[Today at 11:12:12 AM]


Willapa Hills 1 Bear by hunter399
[Today at 10:55:29 AM]


Tree stand for Western Washingtn by Shannon
[Today at 08:56:36 AM]


Bearpaw Outfitters Annual July 4th Hunt Sale by bearpaw
[Today at 08:40:03 AM]


KODIAK06 2025 trail cam and personal pics thread by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 07:53:52 AM]


Pocket Carry by JimmyHoffa
[Today at 07:49:09 AM]


Yard bucks by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 11:20:39 PM]


Yard babies by Feathernfurr
[Yesterday at 10:04:54 PM]


Seeking recommendations on a new scope by coachg
[Yesterday at 08:10:21 PM]


Sauk Unit Youth Elk Tips by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 08:06:05 PM]


Jupiter Mountain Rayonier Permit- 621 Bull Tag by HntnFsh
[Yesterday at 07:58:22 PM]


MOVED: Seekins Element 7PRC for sale by Bob33
[Yesterday at 06:57:10 PM]


3 pintails by metlhead
[Yesterday at 04:44:03 PM]


1993 Merc issues getting up on plane by Happy Gilmore
[Yesterday at 04:37:55 PM]


A lonely Job... by AL WORRELLS KID
[Yesterday at 03:21:14 PM]


Unit 364 Archery Tag by buglebuster
[Yesterday at 12:16:59 PM]


In the background by zwickeyman
[Yesterday at 12:10:13 PM]


A. Cole Lockback in AEB-L and Micarta by A. Cole
[Yesterday at 09:15:34 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal