collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: why no scopes?  (Read 9060 times)

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50475
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: why no scopes?
« Reply #15 on: November 06, 2009, 09:21:39 AM »
What Ribka said

Offline Whitelightning

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 501
  • Location: Lake Stevens
  • Hey Yogi
Re: why no scopes?
« Reply #16 on: November 07, 2009, 01:01:08 PM »
I don't believe putting a scope on a Muzzle Loader gives it SUPER POWERS.
A muzzle Loader Inline or Side Lock has Limitations far beyond what a scope will provide :twocents:

Putting Fiber optics on would then give it Semi Super Power :twocents:
Smoke em when ya see em!

Offline fishcrazy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 1412
  • Location: Tenino
Re: why no scopes?
« Reply #17 on: November 07, 2009, 07:39:32 PM »
You can also use a scope when hunting in a Firearm restricted erea during modern season.


No scopes!!! Cleaner kills don't hold water. With that logic we might as well allow modern rifle in ML season so we can make cleaner faster kills. just my thoughts :dunno:

On a related note I think they should allow hand guns during ML season. They are probably just as effective as a ML. Short range anyway.

Kris
This family supported by UNION wages. Proud member of UA Local 26

Is the taste of the bait worth the sting of the hook twice?

Offline Ray

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2007
  • Posts: 6817
  • Location: Kirkland,WA
    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1475043431
    • Hunting-Washington
Re: why no scopes?
« Reply #18 on: November 07, 2009, 07:56:56 PM »
I'm with ribka.

Offline jstone

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2009
  • Posts: 6565
Re: why no scopes?
« Reply #19 on: November 08, 2009, 03:09:58 PM »
Putting on a scope might give someone the idea they could shoot farther just because they could see better at longer ranges with the scope.

Offline Whitelightning

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 501
  • Location: Lake Stevens
  • Hey Yogi
Re: why no scopes?
« Reply #20 on: November 08, 2009, 03:52:25 PM »
Putting on a scope might give someone the idea they could shoot farther just because they could see better at longer ranges with the scope.

If this is true, shooting a Jacketed bullet with or with out a sabot, rather than a Lead Conical or ball would instill the same misconception, wouldn't it :dunno:
Smoke em when ya see em!

Offline h2ofowlr

  • CHOKED UP TIGHT
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 9120
  • Location: In the "Blind"! Go Cougs!
Re: why no scopes?
« Reply #21 on: November 12, 2009, 09:54:52 PM »
You may find that there are individuals that don't shoot iron sights very good at distance.  If they were to legalize 209 primers, scopes, etc. there would be as many muzzle loaders as rifle shooters probably.  I quit muzzle loading when they starting bring out the non traditional muzzle loaders.  It used to be a great season with not to many people.  I didn't like packing around my Lyman Great Plains rifle though.  No sling and it's a fairly heavy gun.  A great shooter though.
Cut em!
It's not the shells!  It's the shooter!

Offline crittergitter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 3
Re: why no scopes?
« Reply #22 on: November 18, 2009, 12:48:09 PM »
I moved to muzzle from modern for a couple of reasons 1.) get away from the throngs of people that take shots out of their skill level 2.) My longest shot during modern was only 75 yards, Ive done archery with great success, so why not try muzzie. If a person has dedication and hunting skills as noted by Ribka you shouldnt have to take those long shots that require optics....just my 2 cents..

Offline skynimrod

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 41
  • Location: Nashville Tn
Re: why no scopes?
« Reply #23 on: November 20, 2009, 12:32:48 PM »
If I'm not mistaken in WA you can only hunt that particular weapon season only also. That might be y they keep it traditional.
I Fish during the off season!

Offline Whitelightning

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 501
  • Location: Lake Stevens
  • Hey Yogi
Re: why no scopes?
« Reply #24 on: November 20, 2009, 06:12:47 PM »
I moved to muzzle from modern for a couple of reasons 1.) get away from the throngs of people that take shots out of their skill level 2.) My longest shot during modern was only 75 yards, Ive done archery with great success, so why not try muzzie. If a person has dedication and hunting skills as noted by Ribka you shouldnt have to take those long shots that require optics....just my 2 cents..

I agree as all but one of my shots have been under fifty yards.

I do not understand the thinking of the inline being labeled as this 21st century NEW theory. The inline has NO advantage over any SIDELOCK using a musket or #11 cap NONE.
If we are to keep this as a TRADITIONAL season than we should all use Smooth Bore Flint locks, as they are truly the Traditional rifle.
Smoke em when ya see em!

Offline Bofire

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 5524
  • Location: Yelm
  • Harley YAR YAR YAR!
Re: why no scopes?
« Reply #25 on: November 20, 2009, 06:24:14 PM »
 :)What is the difference between allowing scopes in Muzzie season and allowing compound bows in archery season?
They are not primitive, traditional or old. A cross bow is more primitive than a compound bow. I do not do either but I think your argument is illogical.
Carl
When the chips are down..... the buffalo is empty!!

I do not shop at Amazon

Offline M_59

  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 145
  • Location: Mt. Vernon, WA
Re: why no scopes?
« Reply #26 on: November 20, 2009, 07:17:15 PM »
    As you can see from this quote from an article online, the inline concept is actually quite old.    "Truth is, there were actually a few enclosed in-line flintlock ignition systems dating from the 1700s, and Samuel Pauley received the first patent on a percussion in-line ignition system within just a few years of Joshua Shaw's patent for the percussion cap itself. "       I think the problem that everyone has with the inline is that it "looks" too much like a modern rifle so people think their effectiveness is more like a modern rifle as well. Kinda like throwing a set of tires and wheels on your car or an exhaust system. Lotsa people think you then have a "hotrod" when in fact it is still the same car it just "looks"  or sounds different.     Technologial advancements are made daily in the outdoor sports arena, decisions have to be made on what gets to be legal and what doesn't. And much of this technology has been focused on the inline muzzleloader.  Scopes, 209 primers,  and handguns do not belong in a primitive weapon season. Of course I didn't think we needed the jacketed bullets either.  I am sure an experienced shooter armed with a scoped Encore in .270 or .308 would have an effective range much further than a muzzleloader and it would fire every time.  Try telling my friend who hunted the Blues with his big bull permit for 5 days in the pouring down rain and snow that he had an advantage with his inline when he was staring down a 400 class bull and his gun wouldn't go off.   

Offline Ghost Hunter

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 5399
  • Location: SW <-> NE
  • Groups: NRA Patron Life Member, RMEF Life, Sponser Member
Re: why no scopes?
« Reply #27 on: November 21, 2009, 10:30:00 AM »
I am a greenhorn in the smokepole arena.  Couple years ago bought an .50 inline, and have now stepped up to a .54 GPR.  Who knows, in a couple of years, I may be using roundball for all my hunting.  I don't expect my harvest success rate to drop :P :chuckle:, and it may just be more enjoyable hunting. :dunno:  I hope the rules don't loosen up any more on MZ.
Economy failure = Too many people spending money they don't have on things they don't need to impress people they don't like.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Toutle Quality Bull - Rifle by ReidMcSquatch
[Today at 03:24:51 PM]


Pocket Carry by Shawn Ryan
[Today at 03:03:08 PM]


AKC lab puppies! Born 06/10/2025 follow as they grow!!! by scottfrick
[Today at 02:14:23 PM]


Calling Bears by bearmanric
[Today at 02:07:32 PM]


2025 Crab! by Stein
[Today at 01:48:55 PM]


Sauk Unit Youth Elk Tips by Kales15
[Today at 01:04:52 PM]


2025 Coyotes by JakeLand
[Today at 12:20:54 PM]


Price on brass? by Magnum_Willys
[Today at 12:18:54 PM]


AUCTION: SE Idaho DIY Deer or Deer/Elk Hunt by Dan-o
[Today at 10:28:23 AM]


Utah cow elk hunt by kselkhunter
[Today at 09:03:55 AM]


KODIAK06 2025 trail cam and personal pics thread by kodiak06
[Today at 07:03:46 AM]


Unknown Suppressors - Whisper Pickle by Sneaky
[Today at 04:09:53 AM]


Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn! by HillHound
[Yesterday at 11:25:17 PM]


THE ULTIMATE QUAD!!!! by Deer slayer
[Yesterday at 10:33:55 PM]


Archery elk gear, 2025. by WapitiTalk1
[Yesterday at 09:41:28 PM]


Oregon spring bear by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 04:40:38 PM]


Tree stand for Western Washingtn by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 04:37:01 PM]


A lonely Job... by Loup Loup
[Yesterday at 01:15:11 PM]


Range finders & Angle Compensation by Fidelk
[Yesterday at 11:58:48 AM]


Willapa Hills 1 Bear by hunter399
[Yesterday at 10:55:29 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal