Hunting Washington Forum
Washington State Hunting Forum and Northwest Resource Site
Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News:
Free:
Contests & Raffles
.
Home
Help
Calendar
Advertise
Login
Register
Hunting Washington Forum
»
Community
»
Photo & Video
»
Scanned Photo Resolution Question
Advertisement
Advertise Here
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Author
Topic: Scanned Photo Resolution Question (Read 1025 times)
gramps
Non-Hunting Topics
Trade Count:
(
+6
)
Longhunter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 796
Location: SE Wa.
Scanned Photo Resolution Question
«
on:
December 02, 2009, 11:52:30 AM »
If I scan a 35mm negative at 6400 x 9600 or close to it, will this produce a reasonable quality printed photo size 8 x 10 or 11 x 14?? "Reasonable" does not mean pro-quality, just reasonably good.
thanks
Logged
It never changes, but it is always different.
Advertise Here
popeshawnpaul
Washington For Wildlife
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Frontiersman
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3583
Location: Bellevue, WA
Re: Scanned Photo Resolution Question
«
Reply #1 on:
December 02, 2009, 01:25:27 PM »
You are fine all the way down to 120 dpi or dots per inch. I prefer 300 dpi if I can. If you are making an 8x10 that would be 2400x3000 pixels. You might want to scan at a higher resolution than that and then downsize it to make it look better. Scanning at more than the optical resolution would be a waste and would more than likely not look better. I think most scanners optically max out at 3000 or 4000 dpi. Avoid interpolated or digital resolution above the optical maximum.
Your print will look fine.
Logged
www.WSBowhunters.com
www.shawnmccully.com
gramps
Non-Hunting Topics
Trade Count:
(
+6
)
Longhunter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 796
Location: SE Wa.
Re: Scanned Photo Resolution Question
«
Reply #2 on:
December 02, 2009, 06:40:52 PM »
Thanks Shawn. I am maybe looking at more scanner than I really need. You answer to a similar question a long time ago was to rent a photo scanner from an outfit in Seattle which was a great suggestion..but that option just won't work for me now.
Tks
Logged
It never changes, but it is always different.
Advertise Here
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Hunting Washington Forum
»
Community
»
Photo & Video
»
Scanned Photo Resolution Question
Advertisement
Advertise Here
Quick Links
Front Page
Donate To Forum
Advertise on H-W
Recent Posts
Articles
Forum Rules
Recent Topics
Wildlife Obsession Duvall WA Taxidermy Closing its doors
by
storyteller
[
Yesterday
at 11:48:31 PM]
Smelt ?
by
Jake Dogfish
[
Yesterday
at 10:59:35 PM]
MOA or MRAD, & Why?
by
addicted1
[
Yesterday
at 10:45:34 PM]
West side antler buyers
by
addicted1
[
Yesterday
at 10:19:05 PM]
Is it a conflict of interest
by
bbarnes
[
Yesterday
at 08:54:11 PM]
Shotgun Sight help
by
hughjorgan
[
Yesterday
at 08:38:11 PM]
Found after 2 days, meat worth anything?
by
Sandberm
[
Yesterday
at 07:58:12 PM]
Crazy looking Deer
by
NOCK NOCK
[
Yesterday
at 07:35:14 PM]
6x51R
by
JDHasty
[
Yesterday
at 07:22:48 PM]
GO 2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange
by
swordtine
[
Yesterday
at 07:20:45 PM]
"Any Deer" GMU's - Proof of Sex?
by
10thmountainarcher
[
Yesterday
at 07:16:08 PM]
Reinforcing stock for bipod
by
7mmfan
[
Yesterday
at 03:36:10 PM]
Seekins SALE
by
BigJs Outdoor Store
[
Yesterday
at 01:42:40 PM]
Big J's Barn sale / Drawing
by
BigJs Outdoor Store
[
Yesterday
at 01:37:21 PM]
Smith-Reynolds American Legion Post #14 Fall Raffle
by
pianoman9701
[
Yesterday
at 09:18:38 AM]
Idaho on the verge of outlawing
by
bearpaw
[
Yesterday
at 08:37:03 AM]
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal