Hunting Washington Forum
Washington State Hunting Forum and Northwest Resource Site
Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News:
Free:
Contests & Raffles
.
Home
Help
Calendar
Advertise
Login
Register
Hunting Washington Forum
»
Community
»
Photo & Video
»
Scanned Photo Resolution Question
Advertisement
Advertise Here
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Author
Topic: Scanned Photo Resolution Question (Read 1027 times)
gramps
Non-Hunting Topics
Trade Count:
(
+6
)
Longhunter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 796
Location: SE Wa.
Scanned Photo Resolution Question
«
on:
December 02, 2009, 11:52:30 AM »
If I scan a 35mm negative at 6400 x 9600 or close to it, will this produce a reasonable quality printed photo size 8 x 10 or 11 x 14?? "Reasonable" does not mean pro-quality, just reasonably good.
thanks
Logged
It never changes, but it is always different.
Advertise Here
popeshawnpaul
Washington For Wildlife
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Frontiersman
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3583
Location: Bellevue, WA
Re: Scanned Photo Resolution Question
«
Reply #1 on:
December 02, 2009, 01:25:27 PM »
You are fine all the way down to 120 dpi or dots per inch. I prefer 300 dpi if I can. If you are making an 8x10 that would be 2400x3000 pixels. You might want to scan at a higher resolution than that and then downsize it to make it look better. Scanning at more than the optical resolution would be a waste and would more than likely not look better. I think most scanners optically max out at 3000 or 4000 dpi. Avoid interpolated or digital resolution above the optical maximum.
Your print will look fine.
Logged
www.WSBowhunters.com
www.shawnmccully.com
gramps
Non-Hunting Topics
Trade Count:
(
+6
)
Longhunter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 796
Location: SE Wa.
Re: Scanned Photo Resolution Question
«
Reply #2 on:
December 02, 2009, 06:40:52 PM »
Thanks Shawn. I am maybe looking at more scanner than I really need. You answer to a similar question a long time ago was to rent a photo scanner from an outfit in Seattle which was a great suggestion..but that option just won't work for me now.
Tks
Logged
It never changes, but it is always different.
Advertise Here
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Hunting Washington Forum
»
Community
»
Photo & Video
»
Scanned Photo Resolution Question
Advertisement
Advertise Here
Quick Links
Front Page
Donate To Forum
Advertise on H-W
Recent Posts
Articles
Forum Rules
Recent Topics
Hey, Seahawks fans!
by
highside74
[
Today
at 06:03:44 PM]
F150 Tire/Wheel Guys
by
elksnout
[
Today
at 05:26:33 PM]
The Rack
by
NOCK NOCK
[
Today
at 05:14:27 PM]
Question about Hancock Timber Co Eastside
by
HUNTINCOUPLE
[
Today
at 05:09:44 PM]
My Entiat Late tag thread
by
jrebel
[
Today
at 05:06:49 PM]
WA Bucket List….Mule Deer Permit
by
NOCK NOCK
[
Today
at 04:27:58 PM]
2025 deer, let's see em!
by
Kingofthemountain83
[
Today
at 04:24:59 PM]
Idaho on the verge of outlawing
by
Twispriver
[
Today
at 02:31:20 PM]
Cell Cams for Westside Elk
by
Kingofthemountain83
[
Today
at 02:26:48 PM]
This Jeff Davis guy.
by
Kingofthemountain83
[
Today
at 02:14:52 PM]
Crazy looking Deer
by
Gobble Doc
[
Today
at 01:23:27 PM]
GO 2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange
by
wadu1
[
Today
at 01:22:08 PM]
Darwood Outfitters
by
Skyvalhunter
[
Today
at 01:04:49 PM]
Wildlife Obsession Duvall WA Taxidermy Closing its doors
by
253CritterGetter
[
Today
at 12:24:57 PM]
Idaho Trapping Journal 2025/26
by
outdooraddict
[
Today
at 11:21:40 AM]
Smith-Reynolds American Legion Post #14 Fall Raffle
by
HntnFsh
[
Today
at 08:46:23 AM]
HUNTNNW 2025 trail cam thread and photos
by
Machias
[
Today
at 07:50:38 AM]
Weatherby Long Range Steel Choke
by
Henrydog
[
Today
at 06:33:46 AM]
Colockum WMA chukar hunting
by
Kingofthemountain83
[
Yesterday
at 11:44:55 PM]
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal