Hunting Washington Forum
Washington State Hunting Forum and Northwest Resource Site
Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News:
Free:
Contests & Raffles
.
Home
Help
Calendar
Advertise
Login
Register
Hunting Washington Forum
»
Community
»
Photo & Video
»
Scanned Photo Resolution Question
Advertisement
Advertise Here
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Author
Topic: Scanned Photo Resolution Question (Read 1013 times)
gramps
Non-Hunting Topics
Trade Count:
(
+6
)
Longhunter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 796
Location: SE Wa.
Scanned Photo Resolution Question
«
on:
December 02, 2009, 11:52:30 AM »
If I scan a 35mm negative at 6400 x 9600 or close to it, will this produce a reasonable quality printed photo size 8 x 10 or 11 x 14?? "Reasonable" does not mean pro-quality, just reasonably good.
thanks
Logged
It never changes, but it is always different.
Advertise Here
popeshawnpaul
Washington For Wildlife
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Frontiersman
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3583
Location: Bellevue, WA
Re: Scanned Photo Resolution Question
«
Reply #1 on:
December 02, 2009, 01:25:27 PM »
You are fine all the way down to 120 dpi or dots per inch. I prefer 300 dpi if I can. If you are making an 8x10 that would be 2400x3000 pixels. You might want to scan at a higher resolution than that and then downsize it to make it look better. Scanning at more than the optical resolution would be a waste and would more than likely not look better. I think most scanners optically max out at 3000 or 4000 dpi. Avoid interpolated or digital resolution above the optical maximum.
Your print will look fine.
Logged
www.WSBowhunters.com
www.shawnmccully.com
gramps
Non-Hunting Topics
Trade Count:
(
+6
)
Longhunter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 796
Location: SE Wa.
Re: Scanned Photo Resolution Question
«
Reply #2 on:
December 02, 2009, 06:40:52 PM »
Thanks Shawn. I am maybe looking at more scanner than I really need. You answer to a similar question a long time ago was to rent a photo scanner from an outfit in Seattle which was a great suggestion..but that option just won't work for me now.
Tks
Logged
It never changes, but it is always different.
Advertise Here
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Hunting Washington Forum
»
Community
»
Photo & Video
»
Scanned Photo Resolution Question
Advertisement
Advertise Here
Quick Links
Front Page
Donate To Forum
Advertise on H-W
Recent Posts
Articles
Forum Rules
Recent Topics
2025 elk success thread!!
by
jeffitz
[
Today
at 04:04:14 AM]
My Entiat Late tag thread
by
scottfrick
[
Yesterday
at 10:15:40 PM]
Stevens double barrel 410
by
scotsman
[
Yesterday
at 09:39:58 PM]
Xlr element vs mdt hnt26
by
dmoua
[
Yesterday
at 09:30:35 PM]
My Wenaha bull
by
clearwater
[
Yesterday
at 09:06:15 PM]
2025 blacktail rut thread
by
HntnFsh
[
Yesterday
at 08:55:39 PM]
East Side Quail Numbers?
by
Goshawk
[
Yesterday
at 08:55:20 PM]
Hunting late season, where would you go?
by
kodiak06
[
Yesterday
at 07:43:16 PM]
BNSF Land Access
by
ducksdogsdownriggers
[
Yesterday
at 07:07:38 PM]
Late Season archery elk
by
jason stevens
[
Yesterday
at 06:26:12 PM]
Upland bird carry options
by
GWP
[
Yesterday
at 05:28:01 PM]
3 pintails
by
hdshot
[
Yesterday
at 05:23:19 PM]
Game Warden Channel featuring my nephew on Nevada Wild
by
danderson
[
Yesterday
at 03:51:08 PM]
Hunting DNR Natural Area Preserves
by
avidnwoutdoorsman
[
Yesterday
at 03:26:14 PM]
Flynn’s Hunts!!!
by
Tafinder
[
Yesterday
at 12:37:35 PM]
Dash cams
by
jrebel
[
Yesterday
at 12:25:23 PM]
Mechanic help 4.0 ford
by
Woodchuck
[
Yesterday
at 11:50:39 AM]
Slide Ridge Quality tag holders
by
throttlejocky20
[
Yesterday
at 11:41:05 AM]
F150 Ecoboost Guys
by
Boss .300 winmag
[
Yesterday
at 11:25:53 AM]
Buck to Doe Ratio
by
OutHouse
[
Yesterday
at 11:11:15 AM]
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal