Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: Ray on January 05, 2010, 05:05:07 PMQuote from: bearpaw on January 05, 2010, 04:20:42 PMThe members on this forum are more concerned about pain and suffering of deer and elk than the antis really are.... That's beyond ridiculous. It is not based on anything factual.I think bearpaw is saying they don't care a bit about animal pain and suffering, but more about advancing their agenda. We try to ensure shot placement, proper equipment, etc., to ensure the quickest kill possile. Correct me if I'm wrong, bearpaw?*edited for spelling
Quote from: bearpaw on January 05, 2010, 04:20:42 PMThe members on this forum are more concerned about pain and suffering of deer and elk than the antis really are.... That's beyond ridiculous. It is not based on anything factual.
The members on this forum are more concerned about pain and suffering of deer and elk than the antis really are....
The game department could have stepped in and called it a safety hazard? The fact of the matter is there was plenty of time to fiqure out what to do. The Elk were there from Daylight 7:30ish until after 12:00 noon.
I just watched the anti video, and I have seen the news footage before.While I don't agree with the guys shooting those elk while a crowd watched, here is the first thing that popped into my mind when I started watching the elk being shot at again that were wounded:If those bowhunters were wolves, the crowd would have been cheering them on, but since it was human bowhunters they are hated by the same people who would be cheering on the wolves. It's not that those antis are so concerned about an animal suffering, they really could care less about deer and elk, that is just a smoke screen to accomplish there goal of keeping people from hunting. They hate society and people...... Like i said, throw a pack of wolves in the field and they woiuld be cheering while the elk were eaten alive.... That my friends is the sad truth.
One goal of the game department is to get the elk out of the private farmers fields and back into the mountains.One way to do this is to cause a commotion and run them or scare them into the hills. Remember on the video, the guy said they tried to scare them off without hunting them (he used other words).If this commotion got them out of there, then it would be considered a success. I have my doubts that they will want to stay up in the hills with all the other predators.Archery is a good way to accomplish this. It has been used in orchards on the east side many times for deer. It keeps the kills down but runs off the animals (normally).If you just 'drop' a few of them with a gun and haul them off, the others will just stand and watch.(just a thought)
The film doesn't seem to be particularly effective if it was ment to change anbody's prior opinion. These films usually forget to compare and contrast the favored way of the animal dying. Maybe I can help:After the sad new age music part, change to bright and happy smurf music and show the wolves attacking, then show them hit by trucks carrying tofu products, starving animals, yearlings frozen to death, drowning, animals falling to their death, disfiguring diseases... then end with a pretty rainbow.
Yep its an over the counter hunt not a draw. From my understanding they tried to do a Master Hunter on this one but only 3 put in for it. I have thought about going through the Master Hunter program but I just don't have the time to complete it.Shootmoore