Free: Contests & Raffles.
I think other states can afford have lower prices on their resident tags, as they make a larger portion of their money from non-resident hunters. I'd rather pay $80 for an elk tag every other year and have elk to hunt, than $40 every year and have few to no elk to hunt.
Quote from: bobcat on March 06, 2010, 07:48:14 AM58,000 elk ishardly "few to no elk to hunt"
the only problem I see with even odd design is this.....if my number is the opposite of my pard/dad/son......etc, that is going to cause some heartburn
58,000 elk is hardly "few to no elk to hunt"
simple fix. If you live on the westside you hunt on the westside. If you like on the eastside you hunt on the eastside. Eastside elk herd officially fixed!
Hunt harder , lots of opportunities in Wa . Dont punish the few that work there arse off every year and ARE successful
I would be willing to try it for a few years. I archery hunt so it would not really change my hunting other than giving me a better chance for a big bull tag. We will, however, start seeing a decline in the number of enormous Washington bulls. That is just plain common sense. The reason units like Dayton have those huge bulls is because they are given plenty of time to get that big. Once a bull grows that second point he pretty much has a free pass to get as big as he can. People who draw those tags don't typically go after the smaller younger bulls. if we have more people hunting bulls and are able to hunt them more often i think we will see less people holding out for those big bulls. Thus lowering the chance for a bull to live and grow to his full potential. It would be interesting to try this and see how it pans out. It would be a shame to see a decline in the number of really big bulls, but that is just a risk that would have to be taken. If the plan wont work it can always be changed. It has my vote for now.
Arizona already has a permit only system. For the amount of elk habitat that they have to work with, i would say it is very successful. if our state adopted similar management strategies elk numbers and revenue would go up. some units 20-30 bulls per hundred cows and others 40-50bulls. our system is not based on healthy herd management. this would work wether or not you were a meat hunter or trophy hunter. ive been in units like 1 in arizona with 54 bulls per 100 cows and it was awesome. 150-200 any bull permits just for archery and 300 for cows. the best part was the success rates. our state has way more habitat which would expand hunting opportunities and wait times between tags would be much less than arizona. everyone wants to hunt there for one reason and that is they manage game first.