collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Another Permit Question  (Read 12605 times)

Offline Fish4Fun

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 924
  • Location: Moses Lake
Another Permit Question
« on: April 23, 2010, 12:05:22 PM »
After looking at the new rules and all of the new hunts listed, I am curious if I am thinking correctly. With permits costing 6.50 $ it would it be as follows if a person wanted to go after all of the hunts ?   :dunno:
These are on top of the deer and elk tag to start with

Quality Buck = 6.50
Buck Hunts  =  6.50
2nd Deer     =  6.50
Antlerless    =  6.50

TOTAL  =  26.00 + fees

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39203
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Another Permit Question
« Reply #1 on: April 23, 2010, 12:08:26 PM »
Yes, that's what I figured for deer, too.

For elk I will put in for the Quality, Bull, and Antlerless. So that's another $19.50.

For a total of $45.50, just for deer and elk permit applications.

Last year it would have cost about $10 to apply for deer and elk hunts. This year $35 more.   :bash:

Offline Curly

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 20921
  • Location: Thurston County
Re: Another Permit Question
« Reply #2 on: April 23, 2010, 12:10:08 PM »
That is right.  WDFW says there was wide public support for this new system.  I think WDFW ......  :liar:
May I always be the kind of person my dog thinks I am.

><((((º>` ><((((º>. ><((((º>.¸><((((º>

Offline Fish4Fun

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 924
  • Location: Moses Lake
Re: Another Permit Question
« Reply #3 on: April 23, 2010, 12:11:30 PM »
Thanks, I figured I was reading it right. After Elk & Deer then toss in the Waterfowl and the permits and stamps for that and I am off to the bank to ask for a loan.   :chuckle:

Offline winston2789

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2008
  • Posts: 467
  • Location: everett
Re: Another Permit Question
« Reply #4 on: April 23, 2010, 12:12:24 PM »
Argeed Curly, Hopefully this pisses off enough people that it goes away next year.  :dunno:

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39203
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Another Permit Question
« Reply #5 on: April 23, 2010, 12:15:35 PM »
That's the problem. Now that they've implemented this ridiculous permit system, they CAN'T take it away. People are going to be spending money this year to gain points in all the new categories. So I don't see them just eliminating the categories next year and upsetting even more people than they will with this year's change. Although I believe Dave Ware did say something about they might have to "tweak" it a little next year.

Online Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21759
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Another Permit Question
« Reply #6 on: April 23, 2010, 12:19:05 PM »
Some (un)lucky souls can apply in six or more deer categories: disabled youth, disabled senior, master hunter senior, master hunter youth.

Also, did you notice how they had to stick at least one hunt into every category?  There is one disabled moose hunt, so the disabled can spend an extra $6.50 to apply.  There is a Sheep Ewe category with one hunt, a Sheep Youth with one, a Sheep Senior with one.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline CoryTDF

  • Make it Rain!!!
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 3184
  • Location: Walla Walla
  • Look at me I'm blowing a duck call!
Re: Another Permit Question
« Reply #7 on: April 23, 2010, 12:57:15 PM »
I'm going to be spending $91 this year for my special permits. It would seem that the name of the new game is " $REVENUE$"
CoryTDF

"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing"
- Edmund Burke (1729-1797), British statesman and philosopher

Online Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21759
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Another Permit Question
« Reply #8 on: April 23, 2010, 01:04:01 PM »
The purpose was initially to "improve draw odds".  That changed to "increase revenue".  The revenue was to be used to acquire additional land.

I'm going to use the Freedom Of Information act to hound WDFW to give me details of how much revenue they actually received and how it is spent.  I encourge others to do the same.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline WDFW-SUX

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5724
Re: Another Permit Question
« Reply #9 on: April 23, 2010, 01:06:32 PM »
Quote
I'm going to use the Freedom Of Information act to hound WDFW to give me details of how much revenue they actually received and how it is spent.  I encourge others to do the same.

There is no chance that the additional revenue goes into seperate accounts for "land acquisitions"
THE WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUCKS MORE THAN EVER..........

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39203
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Another Permit Question
« Reply #10 on: April 23, 2010, 01:10:07 PM »
Was the money to be used to acquire land, or for private land access? This is what they say on the "Special Permts" page on their website:


Quote
  Department managers are hopeful that these improvements will result in greater customer satisfaction and increase applications for special hunting permits. The additional revenue is intended for use in increasing hunter access to private property 

I think the money will be used to just keep as many employees on as they possibly can.

Offline CoryTDF

  • Make it Rain!!!
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 3184
  • Location: Walla Walla
  • Look at me I'm blowing a duck call!
Re: Another Permit Question
« Reply #11 on: April 23, 2010, 01:10:20 PM »
The purpose was initially to "improve draw odds".  That changed to "increase revenue".  The revenue was to be used to acquire additional land.

I'm going to use the Freedom Of Information act to hound WDFW to give me details of how much revenue they actually received and how it is spent.  I encourge others to do the same.

That is a great idea. However, i'm sure you wont like what you find. I wonder how many dinners my $91 is going to buy Mr. Gregoire.
CoryTDF

"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing"
- Edmund Burke (1729-1797), British statesman and philosopher

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39203
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Another Permit Question
« Reply #12 on: April 23, 2010, 01:14:34 PM »
I feel compelled to throw this quote (lie) in as well, for those who haven't seen it yet:

Quote
This plan was developed with broad public input and the strong support of the Department’s Game Management Advisory Council.


                                     :bs:

Offline WDFW-SUX

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5724
Re: Another Permit Question
« Reply #13 on: April 23, 2010, 01:16:19 PM »
Bob, Here is what they are going to tell you at the end of the day.

If we didnt raise the Revenue we were going to have to discontinue our current leases and then there would basically be no access yes program...  The additional funds will actually go to the state general fund and allow WDFW to keep what they have not get there budget cut..
THE WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUCKS MORE THAN EVER..........

Online Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21759
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Another Permit Question
« Reply #14 on: April 23, 2010, 01:17:28 PM »
I'm sure I won't like what I see.  I'm sure they won't like getting hounded for information requests, so there! :IBCOOL:
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

2025 Crab! by ghosthunter
[Today at 09:43:49 AM]


Nevada bull hunt 2025 by Dan-o
[Today at 09:29:51 AM]


AUCTION: SE Idaho DIY Deer or Deer/Elk Hunt by Dan-o
[Today at 09:26:43 AM]


49 Degrees North Early Bull Moose by washingtonmuley
[Today at 09:23:31 AM]


Survey in ? by hdshot
[Today at 09:20:27 AM]


I'm Going To Need Karl To Come up With That 290 Muley Sunscreen Bug Spray Combo by andrew_in_idaho
[Today at 09:18:45 AM]


Kings by washingtonmuley
[Today at 08:42:03 AM]


Bear behavior by brew
[Today at 08:40:20 AM]


Bearpaw Outfitters Annual July 4th Hunt Sale by bearpaw
[Today at 07:57:12 AM]


A lonely Job... by Loup Loup
[Today at 07:47:41 AM]


2025 Montana alternate list by bear
[Today at 06:06:48 AM]


Accura MR-X 45 load development by kyles_88
[Today at 05:27:26 AM]


Son drawn - Silver Dollar Youth Any Elk - Help? by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 09:42:07 PM]


Toutle Quality Bull - Rifle by HntnFsh
[Yesterday at 08:09:14 PM]


MA-10 Coho by WAcoueshunter
[Yesterday at 02:08:31 PM]


KODIAK06 2025 trail cam and personal pics thread by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 01:52:01 PM]


Blue Mtn Foothills West Rifle Tag by Trooper
[Yesterday at 01:18:40 PM]


GROUSE 2025...the Season is looming! by Dave Workman
[Yesterday at 01:01:22 PM]


50 inch SXS and Tracks? by jrebel
[Yesterday at 11:20:33 AM]


Sockeye Numbers by Southpole
[Yesterday at 11:12:46 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal