collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: second amentment  (Read 17797 times)

Offline gene

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 72
  • Location: spokane
second amentment
« on: February 28, 2008, 06:45:26 PM »
ok heres the thing who cares who wins im 57 now heard it all now if we lose that second amentment this spring we lose everything

Offline ICEMAN

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 15575
  • Location: Olympia
  • The opinionated one... Y.A.R. Exec. Staff
Re: second amentment
« Reply #1 on: February 28, 2008, 07:26:59 PM »
WTF?

Can you explain a bit, I am sort of slow... :dunno:
molṑn labé

A Knuckle Draggin Neanderthal Meat Head

Kill your television....do it now.....

Don't make me hurt you.

“I don't feel we did wrong in taking this great country away from them. There were great numbers of people who needed new land, and the Indians were selfishly trying to keep it for themselves.”  John Wayne

Offline gene

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 72
  • Location: spokane
Re: second amentment
« Reply #2 on: February 28, 2008, 07:34:05 PM »
ok if they say the second amentment is or secured to bere our right to have guns

Offline gene

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 72
  • Location: spokane
Re: second amentment
« Reply #3 on: February 28, 2008, 07:36:00 PM »
opps cant spell lol bear arms

Offline Ray

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2007
  • Posts: 6817
  • Location: Kirkland,WA
    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1475043431
    • Hunting-Washington
Re: second amentment
« Reply #4 on: February 28, 2008, 07:36:28 PM »
supreme court ruling wa d.c.

Offline ICEMAN

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 15575
  • Location: Olympia
  • The opinionated one... Y.A.R. Exec. Staff
Re: second amentment
« Reply #5 on: February 28, 2008, 07:36:43 PM »
Ok, now I understand.
molṑn labé

A Knuckle Draggin Neanderthal Meat Head

Kill your television....do it now.....

Don't make me hurt you.

“I don't feel we did wrong in taking this great country away from them. There were great numbers of people who needed new land, and the Indians were selfishly trying to keep it for themselves.”  John Wayne

Offline popeshawnpaul

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 3583
  • Location: Bellevue, WA
    • http://www.facebook.com/smccully
    • Nature Photography
Re: second amentment
« Reply #6 on: February 28, 2008, 07:45:51 PM »
Good issue...  Great point...

Offline gene

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 72
  • Location: spokane
Re: second amentment
« Reply #7 on: February 28, 2008, 07:54:10 PM »
pop u r just a young person i did not see it my self untel the DC area was non gun but guess how high the crime has been

Offline MikeWalking

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 4667
  • Location: Woodinville
  • Patches Pal
Re: second amentment
« Reply #8 on: February 29, 2008, 08:14:02 AM »
DC biggest gun free zone----DC highest crime rate.

Suppose there's a connection :dunno:

 :bash: :bash:

sisu

  • Guest
Just got this from McMorris
« Reply #9 on: March 07, 2008, 01:21:43 PM »
Dear Scott,

I wanted to take a moment to share with you the recent decision made by the U.S. Appeals Court in regard to the Washington, D.C. handgun ban. Using the Second Amendment as support, the court voted 2-1 to overturn the handgun ban as unconstitutional and allow for the individual possession of handguns in the District of Columbia.

 

Citing the Second Amendment the majority ruled that the right to bear arms is not restricted solely to militia or military bodies, but rather was intended to be an individual statute. The decision to overturn the ban rejects a law that was passed nearly 30 years ago in D.C. as an anti-crime measure. In response to an appeal of this decision by the appeals court, the U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear the case of District of Columbia v. Heller.

 

I felt that this case was an important battle for gun owners and I, along with 249 other members of the House of Representatives and 55 members of the Senate, signed an Amicus Brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia and the United States Supreme Court urging them to overturn the gun ban. A copy of this brief can be located at this website: www.nraila.org/media/PDFs/07_290bcongress_amicus_heller.pdf.

 

This ruling by the appeals court is an enormous step forward for gun owners and proponents of Second Amendment rights. I look forward to seeing the outcome of this case at the Supreme Court level and the impact this will have on gun ownership across the country. If you have any further questions on this issue or other issues, please visit my website at www.mcmorris.house.gov.

 

Offline WAcoyotehunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 4457
  • Location: Pend Oreille County
Re: second amentment
« Reply #10 on: March 07, 2008, 01:32:44 PM »
 See video.  I like this lady.

Offline Head-shot

  • General Underachiever
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 1634
  • Location: Colfax
Re: second amentment
« Reply #11 on: March 07, 2008, 10:31:53 PM »
Wow she really puts it into perspective for them.
Handle every stressful situation like a dog. If you can't eat it or destroy it, piss on it and walk away!

Offline Bofire

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 5524
  • Location: Yelm
  • Harley YAR YAR YAR!
Re: second amentment
« Reply #12 on: March 18, 2008, 09:57:36 AM »
The arguments start today. Some of the quotes sound pretty good for us. Decision by July I think they said.\

I predict a half-assed response, something like, the 2nd. amendment stands but may be interpreted locally or other nonsense.
I cant see any of the Justices really standing up.
Carl
When the chips are down..... the buffalo is empty!!

I do not shop at Amazon

Offline kramman

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 1379
Re: second amentment
« Reply #13 on: March 18, 2008, 10:40:21 AM »
the rights of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.what part of that is open to interpetation >:( :dunno:

Offline EMPyre

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 283
  • Location: Mount Vernon, Wa
Re: second amentment
« Reply #14 on: April 13, 2008, 05:39:43 PM »
Kramman, while I agree whole heartedly with your position, and in fact do beleive that the directness of the statement is clear in its meaning, it is in fact open to interpretation, and here's why.
The exact wording of the second amendment: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The problem is the legal interpretation of the comma that appears after the word 'Arms'.  What is being interpreted is the implied meaning of that comma by those opposed to private fire arms ownership is this:  The government has the right to arm a militia to protect the government AND the citizenry.  The argument here is that the security of a free State shall not be infringed and not directly the right to own fire arms. 

If that comma were not there, (and in fact in some original drafts of the bill of rights it does not) then the meaning would be much better clairfied.  It would then in fact explicitly allow for the citizens to 'keep and bear arms'.  What we need to hope is that the Supreme Court will actually grow a pair this summer and deliver a verdict that defines the second amendment correctly and clearly as we all know and understand it to mean.
Erich with an H

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

2025 blacktail rut thread by blackveltbowhunter
[Yesterday at 11:53:36 PM]


North Idaho 2025 Rifle Bull by Rigby416
[Yesterday at 11:47:41 PM]


2025 Quality Chewuch Tag by Rigby416
[Yesterday at 11:29:10 PM]


Two stories for you (no deer were harmed in the making) by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 11:12:34 PM]


Willipa Hills Antlerless tag by dreadi
[Yesterday at 10:47:10 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by Griiz
[Yesterday at 08:35:32 PM]


As He Lay by Naches Sportsman
[Yesterday at 08:29:16 PM]


seeking recommendation for women's raingear by JWBINX
[Yesterday at 08:18:38 PM]


Where to find hunting mentors/etc in western wa (archery) by paninilord
[Yesterday at 08:15:22 PM]


Animal sounds at Game Commission Meeting, Wow by dreadi
[Yesterday at 07:53:29 PM]


Where to go - Coyotes by th3rug25
[Yesterday at 07:19:26 PM]


New Decoys by h2ofowlr
[Yesterday at 07:17:40 PM]


AMMO 6.5 PRC 143 Gr ELD-X Hornady by dblungshot
[Yesterday at 07:15:03 PM]


Last Minute Light by Brute
[Yesterday at 07:07:42 PM]


Shooting someone else's injured buck - etiquette question by Goshawk
[Yesterday at 05:08:47 PM]


Going to try my hand at calling. by pianoman9701
[Yesterday at 04:10:08 PM]


CCW thanks everyone who showed up to lynwood WDFW commission meeting by Firstgenhunter
[Yesterday at 03:30:16 PM]


2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by D-Rock425
[Yesterday at 02:26:09 PM]


Drew A Bull Moose Tag - 49 Degrees North A, Late hunt NOV 1st- NOV 30th by huntnnw
[Yesterday at 12:33:02 PM]


Second Chance Bull by craigapphunt
[Yesterday at 12:24:55 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal