380 bull poached

[whacker1]

I was under the impression that the blues were kind of "free" from tribal hunting.   I guess I was wrong. 

Not too many places that are free from tribal hunting in WA.   

[jackelope]

I was under the impression that the blues were kind of "free" from tribal hunting.   I guess I was wrong. 

...

not the case unfortunately.

[Scott]

They own most of the south touchet outside of dayton!

[Woodchuck]

Scott, you have a pm

[monster_bull]

you do know when the treaty was signed indians had rifles. 

[Lowedog]

I was under the impression that the blues were kind of "free" from tribal hunting.   I guess I was wrong. 

Not too many places that are free from tribal hunting in WA.   

Just places where there are no roads.   

[br8kitoff]

yep had rifles.....but no elk to hunt until some years after the Elk were re-introduced in 1912...Elk were just about extinct in WA come the late 1800's....just sayin'

[400out]

you do know when the treaty was signed indians had rifles. 

SSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH  we dont want to go down that road! especially on a poaching thread