Looks to me like all tribes don't view their wildlife heritage and resources in a like manner. Tribes in AZ (white mtn, san carlos, hualapai, havasupai, etc), in NM (acoma, zuni), in Utah, etc. are just smarter than some of our own and recognize their wildlife resources (mainly elk, deer, bear, antelope, etc) as something NOT to be killed and taken at will or made available to all tribal members on a kill 'em-at-anytime-anywhere basis. These tribes take a pro-active and long-term view toward wildlife management and limit hunting opportunities for both tribal members and non-tribal members selling that group a limited number of trophy hunts and then they use those funds to help the tribe increase tribal employment and enhance investments and practices that improve their wildlife resources. Sad to see that many tribes and tribal members in Wa and Or tend to see wildlife (game and fish) as an in-your-face opportunity to make whatever points they feel need to be made based on their beliefs that they were disenfranchised on reservations (rightly or wrongly) by anglo Americans in the long ago past.
