collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Ridgefield refuge plan completed  (Read 1035 times)

Offline goosegunner

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 122
Ridgefield refuge plan completed
« on: January 19, 2011, 05:06:12 PM »
  Did anybody see the North County News newspaper last night?  There was a brief article on the new 15 year plan. Sounds mostly disapointing with a touch of good.

Offline Tealer

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 811
Re: Ridgefield refuge plan completed
« Reply #1 on: January 19, 2011, 05:56:38 PM »
I missed it. I went to a public input meeting but never got the results. What did the article say?

Offline goosegunner

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 122
Re: Ridgefield refuge plan completed
« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2011, 05:24:41 AM »
 The article was real brief. The bad-- It basically said if and when they put in the new bridge we will lose 2 blinds. I believe it will be blinds  4 and 1. The check station would move to the little auto tour booth area and 2 replace the 2 blinds lost they were going to put 2 more in the Teal marsh. Which teal marsh is the little marsh right behind the check stand now. that would just screw the hunting up  for blind 12 and 15. That area doesn't need another blind let alone 2.

 Good they are gonna back off on the flooding to try to keep the ponds from getting to deep. and be more applealing to dabbling ducks and not spoonies and divers. They also talked about more crops. But i doubt they will be in the hunting area.

Online CP

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 7042
  • Location: Mukilteo

Offline Tealer

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 811
Re: Ridgefield refuge plan completed
« Reply #4 on: January 20, 2011, 08:25:55 PM »
That doesn't seem too bad. Though the refuge seems to be better at making plans then implementing them. I wonder how this plan would be different if the duskies where in better shape?

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

JBLM Archery by GWP
[Today at 07:48:04 AM]


William o Douglas lakes by hughjorgan
[Today at 07:35:13 AM]


If this is your trap by outdooraddict
[Today at 07:32:14 AM]


Livestock near 49 degrees north? by westdcw
[Today at 07:29:07 AM]


WA Moose scouting by hunter399
[Today at 07:13:56 AM]


JBLM by Carwash
[Yesterday at 10:08:39 PM]


Looking for Solid 22 LR input by run870
[Yesterday at 09:15:50 PM]


Teanaway bull elk by Stein
[Yesterday at 09:14:42 PM]


49 Degrees North Early Bull Moose by Vandal44
[Yesterday at 07:10:03 PM]


3 days for Kings by Parasite
[Yesterday at 07:02:37 PM]


I'm Going To Need Karl To Come up With That 290 Muley Sunscreen Bug Spray Combo by dvolmer
[Yesterday at 06:30:50 PM]


Raffle ticket sales 2025 by greenhead_killer
[Yesterday at 06:18:45 PM]


Yakima bow shop by maxwell
[Yesterday at 05:41:04 PM]


Cell cam recommendation for security? by Stein
[Yesterday at 05:01:50 PM]


2025 Montana alternate list by Sakko300wsm
[Yesterday at 03:55:08 PM]


The end? Bird bands. by hdshot
[Yesterday at 03:44:43 PM]


North Sea Fishing trip by BLH69
[Yesterday at 02:05:14 PM]


2025 Crab! by BLH69
[Yesterday at 02:02:40 PM]


Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn! by MMCCAULEY
[Yesterday at 09:25:10 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal