collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Interstate hunting regulations???  (Read 1794 times)

Offline CP

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 7248
  • Location: Mukilteo
Interstate hunting regulations???
« on: July 31, 2012, 07:05:50 AM »
Say I take a road trip to North Dakota and shoot my possession limit of pheasants there.  Can I stop in Montana and hunt there if I still have the ND pheasants?  How about WA?

Anyone ever make such as trip?


Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25064
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: Interstate hunting regulations???
« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2012, 07:26:11 AM »
Thats a good question that i'd like to know the answer to as well... I would guess that since you have Lic for both and as long as your Phesants from ND are processed then you would be ok.  :dunno:
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21866
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Interstate hunting regulations???
« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2012, 07:11:45 PM »
That is an interesting question.  I will do some research. My initial thought: for big game such as deer there is no "possession limit": if you can legally kill a deer in 10 states, you could legally possess 10 deer.  For waterfowl which is federally managed, most interpretations would conclude that one "aggregate possession limit" does indeed add all U.S. kills together.  See page 6: http://www.fws.gov/le/pdffiles/50_CFR_20.pdf

Upland birds are probably more like big game, in that each state's limit would not be counted toward another state's possession limit.  This assumes, of course, that it could be clearly demonstated from which state the species in one's possession were legally killed.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

My Kansas 2025 Buck by Gentrys
[Today at 09:35:48 PM]


Swakane by bearhunter99
[Today at 09:01:53 PM]


Smith-Reynolds American Legion Post #14 Fall Raffle by scottfrick
[Today at 08:29:36 PM]


2027 Pink Run Destroyed by 3nails
[Today at 08:18:03 PM]


4 days left by kodiak06
[Today at 07:51:18 PM]


Tease 'l' by teanawayslayer
[Today at 07:34:34 PM]


Idaho Trapping Journal 2025/26 by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 06:23:27 PM]


Leopard Cur Pups by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 06:20:45 PM]


GO 2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by rainshadow1
[Today at 02:43:46 PM]


Winthrop wolves by timberfaller
[Today at 01:55:09 PM]


This Jeff Davis guy. by Tbar
[Today at 01:41:33 PM]


Lion Down - the Savor of Success by Sliverslinger
[Today at 11:43:23 AM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by idaho guy
[Today at 11:37:19 AM]


Report Wolf Sightings Here - Hunting-Washington Wolf Count 158+ by Pygmy
[Today at 10:12:05 AM]


Where can one find hides from hunters? by HighlandLofts
[Today at 09:57:59 AM]


In the background by nwwanderer
[Today at 06:44:34 AM]


MOA or MRAD, & Why? by Magnum_Willys
[Yesterday at 09:57:59 PM]


Pics from this year 2025 by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 09:36:06 PM]


2025 elk success thread!! by jstone
[Yesterday at 09:14:54 PM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by Crunchy
[Yesterday at 08:12:33 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal