Free: Contests & Raffles.
Lets say someone draws a quality Elk tag in Dayton and also draws a cow tag in the Clockum. Lets say the guy shoots his bull on the opening day of the Special hunt in Dayton, as it is now in the system he is done hunting elk for the year. I say we make it so the guy can purchase a second elk tag and go after the cow in the Clockum. What the heck is the reason for punishing people who draw special permits in two categories? Let them hunt for both animals. THe WDFW have already determined that X amount of cow tags or Bull tags for a certain area can be permitted. What the heck is the difference if a guy who draws nothing but a cow tag shoots one or a guy who has drawn a permit in two categories shoots it? We've paid for the points and played the game WDFW, Let us hunt!
I don't have the years of experience in the draws many of you do. Went in with 12 points this Year. Personally.... I really think we have the fairest and most realistic point system available. The category split a few years back is what shot down our draw odds. I understand it's a revenue generator for the state, but why not simply combine Fees and eliminate these multiple categories? if it's working the way we are speculating most folks are applying for all applicable categories. Some of these are "wasted" tags I am sure as I personally know of at least a dozen drawn cow tags that never even got hunted on. But regardless I know I would rather pay a one flat fee of say 25 bucks rather than split those fees over three categories (cow, bull, quality).
Wacenturion, this is why I don't even want to ask for any changes to the system. Every time "improvements" have been made, it has become more complicated, less fair, and more expensive.
Quote from: bobcat on May 26, 2015, 05:12:31 PMWacenturion, this is why I don't even want to ask for any changes to the system. Every time "improvements" have been made, it has become more complicated, less fair, and more expensive. The changes have done exactly what they were originally designed to do, "improve" the revenue stream, that is all they have ever been intended to do.....period!
Quote from: huntnphool on May 27, 2015, 08:36:41 AMQuote from: bobcat on May 26, 2015, 05:12:31 PMWacenturion, this is why I don't even want to ask for any changes to the system. Every time "improvements" have been made, it has become more complicated, less fair, and more expensive. The changes have done exactly what they were originally designed to do, "improve" the revenue stream, that is all they have ever been intended to do.....period! Dave Ware, Thankfully he's only in charge of the wolves now, and nothing else.
Quote from: bobcat on May 27, 2015, 08:41:21 AMQuote from: huntnphool on May 27, 2015, 08:36:41 AMQuote from: bobcat on May 26, 2015, 05:12:31 PMWacenturion, this is why I don't even want to ask for any changes to the system. Every time "improvements" have been made, it has become more complicated, less fair, and more expensive. The changes have done exactly what they were originally designed to do, "improve" the revenue stream, that is all they have ever been intended to do.....period! Dave Ware, Thankfully he's only in charge of the wolves now, and nothing else.
Quote from: huntnphool on May 27, 2015, 08:36:41 AMQuote from: bobcat on May 26, 2015, 05:12:31 PMWacenturion, this is why I don't even want to ask for any changes to the system. Every time "improvements" have been made, it has become more complicated, less fair, and more expensive. The changes have done exactly what they were originally designed to do, "improve" the revenue stream, that is all they have ever been intended to do.....period!100% true! And they lied and said it was to improve drawing odds. I blame it all on one person- Dave Ware. Thankfully he's only in charge of the wolves now, and nothing else.
When it comes time for wdfw to make wolf management decisions, I can hear Dave Ware saying: "There was broad public support for this decision" (whatever decision they end up making). He will consider what is discussed in the WAG as "broad public support" just like he did with the GMAC in implementing the current special permit application system he pushed through.