collapse

Advertisement


Poll

Are you in favor of this bill?

Yes
No

Author Topic: Inslee's Hunting/Fishing License Fee Bill Introduced Contains Pros & Cons  (Read 7661 times)

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10277
Senator Rolfes introduced SB 6166 which was requested by the Office of Financial Management. Typically hunting/fishing license bills are requested by WDFW. The fee increase is significantly less than the 10% across the board proposed by WDFW in the past and what many thought Inslee would propose...

Basically, the bill does a few things:

-Makes the "youth" age for fishing the same for hunting. Currently youth for hunting is under 16 while for fishing it's under 15, under this bill the age would be under 16.
-Reduction in the price for most resident fishing licenses while increasing the non-resident costs
-Slight increase to most resident hunting license fees (some are reduced), with a larger increase to non-resident costs

BUT

The bill allows the WDFW Commission to tack on a surcharge to these fees every other year to cover inflationary costs and budget shortfalls in the WDFW budget. Currently only the legislature can increase the price of licenses, this bill would allow the commission to control the price as long as they keep it within the parameters of offsetting costs.

So the big question of course is what are the proposed baseline fees? Here's a few

Resident:
Deer/Elk/Bear/Cougar Combo   $97.75 (currently $95.50)
Deer/Elk/Bear/Cougar Combo w/ Small Game Discount $118.64 (currently $117.50)
Small Game $40.25 (currently $40.50)
Turkey Tag #1 $16.10 (currently $15.90)
Combo Fishing $51.86 (currently $55.35)

Non-Resident:
Combo Fishing $124.78 (currently $124.65)
Small Game $189.75 (currently $183.50)
Deer: $451.95 (currently $434.30)

Offline Widgeondeke

  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 3337
  • Location: Lake Stevens, WA
  • US Army Infantry 91-98
The only part I like is the part of making the "Youth" age parameters the same.  That's just common sense

on the face price changes appear to be okay(5% or less), but the unknown surcharge fee amount that can be added to makeup budget shortfalls. It needs to be spelled out as a max increase %. The way I read it below, if the commission wanted to, they could add any amount as a surcharge.
Why decrease small game and fishing licenses? The minimal amount seems trivial as to appease to the fisherman who may not agree with hunting.  Are they wanting to divide the two sides?

 :twocents:

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 7662
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • If you know me,then you know I give zero #&$@$
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
The only part I like is the part of making the "Youth" age parameters the same.  That's just common sense

on the face price changes appear to be okay(5% or less), but the unknown surcharge fee amount that can be added to makeup budget shortfalls. It needs to be spelled out as a max increase %. The way I read it below, if the commission wanted to, they could add any amount as a surcharge.
Why decrease small game and fishing licenses? The minimal amount seems trivial as to appease to the fisherman who may not agree with hunting.  Are they wanting to divide the two sides?

 :twocents:

I agree  :yeah:
But I would never give them a blank check for surcharge fees .They way they piss money away on wolves alone , They are always at a budget shortfall.That why I voted no,Don't mind them increase a little.But a blank check every year NO WAY. :yike:

I rather piss in the wind,then have piss down my back.

Offline trophyhunt

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 18673
  • Location: Wetside
  • Groups: Wa Wild Sheep Life Member
The only part I like is the part of making the "Youth" age parameters the same.  That's just common sense

on the face price changes appear to be okay(5% or less), but the unknown surcharge fee amount that can be added to makeup budget shortfalls. It needs to be spelled out as a max increase %. The way I read it below, if the commission wanted to, they could add any amount as a surcharge.
Why decrease small game and fishing licenses? The minimal amount seems trivial as to appease to the fisherman who may not agree with hunting.  Are they wanting to divide the two sides?

 :twocents:

I agree  :yeah:
But I would never give them a blank check for surcharge fees .They way they piss money away on wolves alone , They are always at a budget shortfall.That why I voted no,Don't mind them increase a little.But a blank check every year NO WAY. :yike:
:yeah: If they can raise the price when they want, what do you think they will do?????
“In common with”..... not so much!!

Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+22)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 10047
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
I'm so sick and tired of paying more for less. Do better counts, issue permits accordingly (ie elk permits in central WA), make a concerted effort to increase mule deer populations instead of focusing on selling tags, provide better youth hunting opportunities,  etc, etc, etc.  Show me improvement and then ask me for money.
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

Offline grundy53

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 12832
  • Location: Lake Stevens
  • Learn something new everyday.
    • facebook
I'm so sick and tired of paying more for less. Do better counts, issue permits accordingly (ie elk permits in central WA), make a concerted effort to increase mule deer populations instead of focusing on selling tags, provide better youth hunting opportunities,  etc, etc, etc.  Show me improvement and then ask me for money.
:yeah:

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Molôn Labé
Can you skin Grizz?

The opinions expressed in my posts do not represent those of the forum.

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 24823
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
This is the camel's nose under the tent. Once they get this they can force hunters to pay for all the unfunded mandates they want. Until they kill the golden goose, which the Govenor seems intent on.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline TheStovePipeKid

  • They call me MISTER KID!
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2013
  • Posts: 751
  • Location: Lakebay, Wa
  • I. Kill. Turkey.
    • TheStovePipeKid
  • Groups: NWTF Annual Member, NRA Extended Pay Lifetime Member
We have to think more positively. Eventually there will be no fish and no game in the state and the entire department will be disbanded. The we can do whatever we want. It will be like a barren utopia of freedom.
I laugh in the face of Danger. Ha ha ha Danger Face!

Offline buckfvr

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 4508
  • Location: UNGULATE FREE ZONE UNIT 121
No open surcharge for agencies that deny transparency and accountability......... :bdid:

Offline idahohuntr

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 3534
this bill would allow the commission to control the price as long as they keep it within the parameters of offsetting costs.

Like others - this quoted part is what concerns me the most.  I'm typically a big proponent of hunters funding game departments and often feel like Residents should be willing to shoulder increased costs to fund these departments (even though jacking up NR prices is by far the most politically convenient answer for states with a NR market!).  But this blank check of "offsetting costs" is absurd.  Bureaucrats can always come up with the calamity that will occur if they don't increase prices to "offset costs". 

I just do not see WDFW and their $400+ million dollar budget as something where they have a funding shortfall...they have a priority and focus shortfall.  WDFW is the only agency in the west where I think the agency and the sportsmen would benefit from a substantially reduced budget.  It would force them to get rid of the low priority stuff that is a constant distraction and resource drain on the agency.  With a smaller agency and budget - they can focus better on their core customers and spend money on things that matter and that they have control over.  Butterflies, gophers, and wolf facilitator programs can go away...hunter access programs, wildlife and habitat management...come to the front of the line.  :twocents:
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood..." - TR

Offline vandeman17

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 14117
  • Location: Wenatchee
Re: Inslee's Hunting/Fishing License Fee Bill Introduced Contains Pros & Cons
« Reply #10 on: January 09, 2020, 09:18:48 AM »
I'm so sick and tired of paying more for less. Do better counts, issue permits accordingly (ie elk permits in central WA), make a concerted effort to increase mule deer populations instead of focusing on selling tags, provide better youth hunting opportunities,  etc, etc, etc.  Show me improvement and then ask me for money.

100% agree and this is why they get less and less of my money each year
" I have hunted almost every day of my life, the rest have been wasted"

Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+22)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 10047
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
Re: Inslee's Hunting/Fishing License Fee Bill Introduced Contains Pros & Cons
« Reply #11 on: January 09, 2020, 11:04:22 AM »
this bill would allow the commission to control the price as long as they keep it within the parameters of offsetting costs.

Like others - this quoted part is what concerns me the most.  I'm typically a big proponent of hunters funding game departments and often feel like Residents should be willing to shoulder increased costs to fund these departments (even though jacking up NR prices is by far the most politically convenient answer for states with a NR market!).  But this blank check of "offsetting costs" is absurd.  Bureaucrats can always come up with the calamity that will occur if they don't increase prices to "offset costs". 

I just do not see WDFW and their $400+ million dollar budget as something where they have a funding shortfall...they have a priority and focus shortfall.  WDFW is the only agency in the west where I think the agency and the sportsmen would benefit from a substantially reduced budget.  It would force them to get rid of the low priority stuff that is a constant distraction and resource drain on the agency.  With a smaller agency and budget - they can focus better on their core customers and spend money on things that matter and that they have control over.  Butterflies, gophers, and wolf facilitator programs can go away...hunter access programs, wildlife and habitat management...come to the front of the line.  :twocents:
agreed
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

Offline Old Man Yager

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2012
  • Posts: 2046
  • Location: Puyallup, WA. USA
  • Groups: NRA, PRHAA
Re: Inslee's Hunting/Fishing License Fee Bill Introduced Contains Pros & Cons
« Reply #12 on: January 09, 2020, 11:11:34 AM »
Voted Hell no. They would jack it up every chance the get.
My Dad always said, " Get a bigger hammer "

Offline Fl0und3rz

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 51553
  • Location: E. WA
Re: Inslee's Hunting/Fishing License Fee Bill Introduced Contains Pros & Cons
« Reply #13 on: January 09, 2020, 11:47:53 AM »
No open surcharge for agencies that deny transparency and accountability......... :bdid:

:yeah:

Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34514
  • Location: NE Corner
Re: Inslee's Hunting/Fishing License Fee Bill Introduced Contains Pros & Cons
« Reply #14 on: January 09, 2020, 12:21:23 PM »
The surcharge thing is a deal breaker, but it looked OK up until that. 


drop the surcharge thing off and I'd vote yes. 

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Let’s see your best Washington buck by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 10:31:08 PM]


Bearpaw Season - Spring 2024 by actionshooter
[Yesterday at 09:43:51 PM]


Walked a cougar down by MADMAX
[Yesterday at 08:31:53 PM]


Which 12” boat trailer tires? by timberhunter
[Yesterday at 08:22:18 PM]


Lowest power 22 round? by JakeLand
[Yesterday at 08:06:13 PM]


1x scopes vs open sights by JakeLand
[Yesterday at 07:29:35 PM]


Long Beach Clamming Tides by Encore 280
[Yesterday at 05:16:00 PM]


WTS Suppressors I Can Get by dreadi
[Yesterday at 03:30:33 PM]


SB 5444 signed by Inslee on 03/26 Takes Effect on 06/06/24 by Longfield1
[Yesterday at 03:27:51 PM]


Straight on by kentrek
[Yesterday at 03:04:53 PM]


2024-2026 Hunting Season Proposals by trophyhunt
[Yesterday at 01:51:40 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal