collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Could be very bad for freedom?  (Read 5105 times)

Offline hdshot

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 704
  • Location: e wa
Re: Could be very bad for freedom?
« Reply #30 on: February 15, 2024, 06:33:39 PM »
Here we go again!  2 juveniles in custody for possibly being involved in the KC Super Bowl parade shooting.  If the juveniles get convicted just hope law abiding citizens that that do shooting sports with their kids don’t get caught in the middle of possible new laws of the future.

https://amp.kansascity.com/news/politics-government/article285532507.html
Don't read my post if facts hurt your feeling.

Offline ghosthunter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+19)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 7213
  • Location: Mount Vernon WA
Re: Could be very bad for freedom?
« Reply #31 on: February 15, 2024, 09:42:22 PM »
Saw coverage tonight. Crime up 166% there. Huge gang problem. One of the firearms a long gun.

Had increasing crime past four years.
GHOST CAMP "We Came To Hunt"
Proud Parent of A United States Marine

We are all traveling from Birth to the Packing House. ( Broken Trail)

“I f he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.” ― Theodore Roosevelt

Online jrebel

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2008
  • Posts: 10674
  • Location: East Wenatchee
Re: Could be very bad for freedom?
« Reply #32 on: February 15, 2024, 10:49:46 PM »
Here we go again!  2 juveniles in custody for possibly being involved in the KC Super Bowl parade shooting.  If the juveniles get convicted just hope law abiding citizens that that do shooting sports with their kids don’t get caught in the middle of possible new laws of the future.

https://amp.kansascity.com/news/politics-government/article285532507.html

I can't open the article, did the parents purchase these guns for the juveniles?  Did the juveniles have unobstructed access to these firearms?  Did the juveniles have behavioral or mental health history documented? 

I don't know much about these kids....but if the parents bought them guns and let them have unobstructed access, then maybe the parents have some responsibility / liability. 


Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32703
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Could be very bad for freedom?
« Reply #33 on: February 15, 2024, 10:56:26 PM »
 Amazing that parents can be held accountable for something like this, yet have zero say so when the schools teach their kids to have sex change procedures! :rolleyes:

 I wonder which political side is supportive of these measures!!! :rolleyes:
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline metlhead

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 1345
  • Location: sw wa
Re: Could be very bad for freedom?
« Reply #34 on: February 16, 2024, 07:35:07 AM »
Nothing will change because of the shooting at thr Taylor Swift parade. Lots of finger pointing and blame directed towards anything with deep pockets then it'll be forgotten. Fortunately it'll be that much closer to waterfowl season and we can be happy smily again.

Offline trophyhunt

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 18872
  • Location: Wetside
  • Groups: Wa Wild Sheep Life Member
Re: Could be very bad for freedom?
« Reply #35 on: February 16, 2024, 07:55:43 AM »
Amazing that parents can be held accountable for something like this, yet have zero say so when the schools teach their kids to have sex change procedures! :rolleyes:

 I wonder which political side is supportive of these measures!!! :rolleyes:
at this point, is there ANYTHING the dems do that is positive? So tired of them.
“In common with”..... not so much!!

Offline hdshot

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 704
  • Location: e wa
Re: Could be very bad for freedom?
« Reply #36 on: February 16, 2024, 04:11:15 PM »
Here we go again!  2 juveniles in custody for possibly being involved in the KC Super Bowl parade shooting.  If the juveniles get convicted just hope law abiding citizens that that do shooting sports with their kids don’t get caught in the middle of possible new laws of the future.

https://amp.kansascity.com/news/politics-government/article285532507.html

I can't open the article, did the parents purchase these guns for the juveniles?  Did the juveniles have unobstructed access to these firearms?  Did the juveniles have behavioral or mental health history documented? 

I don't know much about these kids....but if the parents bought them guns and let them have unobstructed access, then maybe the parents have some responsibility / liability.

If the parents had absolutely no involvement in the shooting even if the parents legally bought the guns you better hope the parents won’t be liable in any way because law abiding parents might never buy their kids a gun to hunt with again or even for themselves.  Only those responsible for their crime are responsible.  Laws could include everyone, even good people with no talking out both sides of your mouth.
Don't read my post if facts hurt your feeling.

Online jrebel

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2008
  • Posts: 10674
  • Location: East Wenatchee
Re: Could be very bad for freedom?
« Reply #37 on: February 16, 2024, 07:09:02 PM »
Here we go again!  2 juveniles in custody for possibly being involved in the KC Super Bowl parade shooting.  If the juveniles get convicted just hope law abiding citizens that that do shooting sports with their kids don’t get caught in the middle of possible new laws of the future.

https://amp.kansascity.com/news/politics-government/article285532507.html

I can't open the article, did the parents purchase these guns for the juveniles?  Did the juveniles have unobstructed access to these firearms?  Did the juveniles have behavioral or mental health history documented? 

I don't know much about these kids....but if the parents bought them guns and let them have unobstructed access, then maybe the parents have some responsibility / liability.

If the parents had absolutely no involvement in the shooting even if the parents legally bought the guns you better hope the parents won’t be liable in any way because law abiding parents might never buy their kids a gun to hunt with again or even for themselves.  Only those responsible for their crime are responsible.  Laws could include everyone, even good people with no talking out both sides of your mouth.

That’s a very ignorant post.   I’m all for debates and discussion, but when you accuse people of talking out of both sides of their mouth…..I’ll bow out.   I could give you examples of where your wrong….but that wouldn’t help.   Good luck to you!! 

Offline hdshot

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 704
  • Location: e wa
Re: Could be very bad for freedom?
« Reply #38 on: February 20, 2024, 06:01:35 PM »
Here we go again!  2 juveniles in custody for possibly being involved in the KC Super Bowl parade shooting.  If the juveniles get convicted just hope law abiding citizens that that do shooting sports with their kids don’t get caught in the middle of possible new laws of the future.

https://amp.kansascity.com/news/politics-government/article285532507.html

I can't open the article, did the parents purchase these guns for the juveniles?  Did the juveniles have unobstructed access to these firearms?  Did the juveniles have behavioral or mental health history documented? 

I don't know much about these kids....but if the parents bought them guns and let them have unobstructed access, then maybe the parents have some responsibility / liability.

If the parents had absolutely no involvement in the shooting even if the parents legally bought the guns you better hope the parents won’t be liable in any way because law abiding parents might never buy their kids a gun to hunt with again or even for themselves.  Only those responsible for their crime are responsible.  Laws could include everyone, even good people with no talking out both sides of your mouth.

That’s a very ignorant post.   I’m all for debates and discussion, but when you accuse people of talking out of both sides of their mouth…..I’ll bow out.   I could give you examples of where your wrong….but that wouldn’t help.   Good luck to you!!

It is because you have no examples and never accused anybody of talking out both sides of their mouth but explained in clear English the law could not allow talking out both sides of your mouth. 
Don't read my post if facts hurt your feeling.

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32703
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Could be very bad for freedom?
« Reply #39 on: February 21, 2024, 11:25:47 PM »
Amazing that parents can be held accountable for something like this, yet have zero say so when the schools teach their kids to have sex change procedures! :rolleyes:

 I wonder which political side is supportive of these measures!!! :rolleyes:

 Brought to you by the democrat party and their voters!
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline hdshot

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 704
  • Location: e wa
Re: Could be very bad for freedom?
« Reply #40 on: March 06, 2024, 04:07:47 PM »
Here we go again!  2 juveniles in custody for possibly being involved in the KC Super Bowl parade shooting.  If the juveniles get convicted just hope law abiding citizens that that do shooting sports with their kids don’t get caught in the middle of possible new laws of the future.

https://amp.kansascity.com/news/politics-government/article285532507.html

I can't open the article, did the parents purchase these guns for the juveniles?  Did the juveniles have unobstructed access to these firearms?  Did the juveniles have behavioral or mental health history documented? 

I don't know much about these kids....but if the parents bought them guns and let them have unobstructed access, then maybe the parents have some responsibility / liability.

If the parents had absolutely no involvement in the shooting even if the parents legally bought the guns you better hope the parents won’t be liable in any way because law abiding parents might never buy their kids a gun to hunt with again or even for themselves.  Only those responsible for their crime are responsible.  Laws could include everyone, even good people with no talking out both sides of your mouth.

That’s a very ignorant post.   I’m all for debates and discussion, but when you accuse people of talking out of both sides of their mouth…..I’ll bow out.   I could give you examples of where your wrong….but that wouldn’t help.   Good luck to you!!

Thumbing through here and you did give an example of what a blanket statement is like what my former hunting partner does to others.  Mainly gave time to digest and notice the words everyone and people, unless not human the words everyone and people includes myself.  Keep making those statements turning away with no conscience. 
Don't read my post if facts hurt your feeling.

Online Platensek-po

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2018
  • Posts: 1369
  • Location: Shelton, wa
Re: Could be very bad for freedom?
« Reply #41 on: March 06, 2024, 06:37:01 PM »
Here we go again!  2 juveniles in custody for possibly being involved in the KC Super Bowl parade shooting.  If the juveniles get convicted just hope law abiding citizens that that do shooting sports with their kids don’t get caught in the middle of possible new laws of the future.

https://amp.kansascity.com/news/politics-government/article285532507.html

I can't open the article, did the parents purchase these guns for the juveniles?  Did the juveniles have unobstructed access to these firearms?  Did the juveniles have behavioral or mental health history documented? 

I don't know much about these kids....but if the parents bought them guns and let them have unobstructed access, then maybe the parents have some responsibility / liability.

If the parents had absolutely no involvement in the shooting even if the parents legally bought the guns you better hope the parents won’t be liable in any way because law abiding parents might never buy their kids a gun to hunt with again or even for themselves.  Only those responsible for their crime are responsible.  Laws could include everyone, even good people with no talking out both sides of your mouth.

That’s a very ignorant post.   I’m all for debates and discussion, but when you accuse people of talking out of both sides of their mouth…..I’ll bow out.   I could give you examples of where your wrong….but that wouldn’t help.   Good luck to you!!

It is because you have no examples and never accused anybody of talking out both sides of their mouth but explained in clear English the law could not allow talking out both sides of your mouth.

In clear English???  :dunno:
“Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary.”

If you are not willing to die for freedom then take the word out of your vocabulary.

Offline trophyhunt

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 18872
  • Location: Wetside
  • Groups: Wa Wild Sheep Life Member
Re: Could be very bad for freedom?
« Reply #42 on: March 07, 2024, 06:48:37 AM »
Not going to read this entire thread but, didn't the dad follow the law when it came to that states rules on gun storage?  And he separated the ammo, sounded like he tried?  And the argument is he should have done more?  If that's the case, and some of you want him to go to jail, wow.  I know good friends with kids that went through some bad years, hell, I thought he would shoot up a school some day.  Should I go to jail if he did?  Blaming parents for being bad parents is fine, there are a lot of bad parents out there. But putting them in jail for it, man that's a slope I don't want to be judged on.  I also wonder if this lady that was found guilty was black, would she had even ended up in court?  No way!
« Last Edit: March 07, 2024, 06:54:07 AM by trophyhunt »
“In common with”..... not so much!!

Offline hdshot

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 704
  • Location: e wa
Re: Could be very bad for freedom?
« Reply #43 on: March 07, 2024, 05:27:17 PM »
Here we go again!  2 juveniles in custody for possibly being involved in the KC Super Bowl parade shooting.  If the juveniles get convicted just hope law abiding citizens that that do shooting sports with their kids don’t get caught in the middle of possible new laws of the future.

https://amp.kansascity.com/news/politics-government/article285532507.html

I can't open the article, did the parents purchase these guns for the juveniles?  Did the juveniles have unobstructed access to these firearms?  Did the juveniles have behavioral or mental health history documented? 

I don't know much about these kids....but if the parents bought them guns and let them have unobstructed access, then maybe the parents have some responsibility / liability.

If the parents had absolutely no involvement in the shooting even if the parents legally bought the guns you better hope the parents won’t be liable in any way because law abiding parents might never buy their kids a gun to hunt with again or even for themselves.  Only those responsible for their crime are responsible.  Laws could include everyone, even good people with no talking out both sides of your mouth.

That’s a very ignorant post.   I’m all for debates and discussion, but when you accuse people of talking out of both sides of their mouth…..I’ll bow out.   I could give you examples of where your wrong….but that wouldn’t help.   Good luck to you!!

It is because you have no examples and never accused anybody of talking out both sides of their mouth but explained in clear English the law could not allow talking out both sides of your mouth.

In clear English???  :dunno:

Lol you found the joke similar dumb and dumber talking to each other.
Don't read my post if facts hurt your feeling.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

1x scopes vs open sights by duckmen1
[Today at 05:06:31 PM]


Help- stuck action screw by Crunchy
[Today at 05:05:55 PM]


2024 Special Permit Draw Results by Platensek-po
[Today at 04:50:46 PM]


Washington state record blacktail by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 04:50:08 PM]


Oregon Seed numbers 2024 by youngbuckslayer
[Today at 04:45:27 PM]


Everett Boat Launch by fishngamereaper
[Today at 02:54:15 PM]


Anyone going to Wyoming this fall? by gaolista
[Today at 02:53:17 PM]


New Mexico by Beastmonger1987
[Today at 01:56:42 PM]


MA10 launches by metlhead
[Today at 01:05:53 PM]


Girls found the rock by hunter399
[Today at 12:07:52 PM]


UT draw results 2024 by Beastmonger1987
[Today at 11:43:36 AM]


Nevada results by Beastmonger1987
[Today at 11:41:46 AM]


Arizona by Beastmonger1987
[Today at 11:39:49 AM]


NM Muzzy Elk Hunt by Jimmy33
[Today at 11:33:39 AM]


Survey from association of fish and wildlife agencies? by Frank The Tank
[Today at 09:41:28 AM]


Tri Cities bank fishing? by MeepDog
[Today at 08:38:51 AM]


Anyone shoot Fiocchi shotshells? by hunterednate
[Today at 08:35:36 AM]


Memorial Day. by pianoman9701
[Today at 07:50:08 AM]


Who’s been to South Africa recent? by arrowflinger
[Today at 05:50:49 AM]


All-Around Big Game Caliber by tgomez
[Today at 04:43:17 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal