Free: Contests & Raffles.
Funny how those on the westside who expect us on the eastside to change our lifestyles to accomodate wolves don't want anything to do with wolves in their neighborhood.
Quotei disagree! it was the gov that reintroduced these causing the problem they should be liable. although if the gov is liable that just means you and i have to flip the bill.I doubt this wolf came from "reintroduced" wolves. Isn't it more likely that the wolves in the North Cascade Mountains got there by walking across the Canadian border?If it could be proven that the WDFW put this particular wolf in this man's "backyard" then I would agree, the state is liable.But, I don't think that's the case. Do you?
i disagree! it was the gov that reintroduced these causing the problem they should be liable. although if the gov is liable that just means you and i have to flip the bill.
i think to just assume these came out of canada is dumb and trying to pass the blame off the real problem. they were introduced into wyoming shortly there after found in montana, idaho and now washington while over populating all along the way. if you cant see the pattern you need to go back to kindergarten and start playing with puzzles again. the over population of wolves in northern washington is causing cougars to move from the north to the south as well but this is another issue all together.
Quote from: motg9_6 on March 13, 2013, 11:48:37 AMi think to just assume these came out of canada is dumb and trying to pass the blame off the real problem. they were introduced into wyoming shortly there after found in montana, idaho and now washington while over populating all along the way. if you cant see the pattern you need to go back to kindergarten and start playing with puzzles again. the over population of wolves in northern washington is causing cougars to move from the north to the south as well but this is another issue all together.What does it really matter where they came from? They're a native species, and they are there! Don't get mad at me! I don't want them either!The only thing I'm trying to say is the state is not liable for someone's vet bill because his dog got bit. I'm surprised with all the people on here who are for a smaller government, yet they want handouts from the government when something like this happens.
If there were an open season on wolves, this kind of thing would still happen. Coyotes are hunted year around. Yet they still come into people's backyards and kill their pets and/or livestock. Shouldn't they have "learned" by now that people don't want their pets eaten?I think your argument is ridiculous. I don't believe Twisp is in the area that wolves have been delisted by the Feds. So even if the state wanted to have a hunting season on wolves, the Feds wouldn't allow it.
Quote from: bobcat on March 13, 2013, 11:54:37 AMIf there were an open season on wolves, this kind of thing would still happen. Coyotes are hunted year around. Yet they still come into people's backyards and kill their pets and/or livestock. Shouldn't they have "learned" by now that people don't want their pets eaten?I think your argument is ridiculous. I don't believe Twisp is in the area that wolves have been delisted by the Feds. So even if the state wanted to have a hunting season on wolves, the Feds wouldn't allow it.Wolves and coyotes are completely different animals with completely different instincts. There is no comparison between the two species at all.