Free: Contests & Raffles.
To get even more off topic, why is it that wolves are considered to be endangered, yet bison are not? I feel bison should be listed as well, and a plan put in place to restore them to their historical numbers. At least they are good to eat, AND they will provide another source of food for the wolves!
Quote from: bobcat on March 21, 2013, 07:51:01 PMTo get even more off topic, why is it that wolves are considered to be endangered, yet bison are not? I feel bison should be listed as well, and a plan put in place to restore them to their historical numbers. At least they are good to eat, AND they will provide another source of food for the wolves! Because the ESA is NOT about animals! Its about $ and control. NO other answer makes sense.
I'm sorry bobcat you must either be trying to discredit me or you are completely ignorant of the facts. Have you not read ANY of the articles over the last 30 years about the spotted owl? Since you are a westsider and hunter you must have at least a little knowledge on the subject.Spotted owls were used by Eco groups to stop the logging on the OLY Pen. It was NOT about the owls it was about not cutting timber on NF land.So far I've only heard you say that you don't like wolves either, and that anyone who thinks the WDFW or USFS have not put forth their best effort is a wack job conspiracy theorist.Contrary to what those agencies may SAY they are going to do, they have to follow though on them.... That is how MANY people can lie without actually contradicting themselves. Excuses can be made as to why there is piss poor performance despite their "best" intentions.
Quote from: skywalker253 on March 21, 2013, 11:26:21 PMQuote from: Skyvalhunter on March 21, 2013, 07:57:10 PMOne of the problems is that the WDFW can make the numbers look however they want them. An example is the deer populations thru out the state. Back in the 80's and 90's the state said the deer population was just the right in areas like the Entiat, Methow, Chiwawa. Now if you listen to the biologists the deer populations are once again just right even though they are not even close to what they used to be. The same thing has happened with the Saint Helens and the Clockum elk herds so if they want to say that the wolves are having no effect on the deer or elk populations they will adjust the numbers accordingly.I agree with you. Years ago we had way more deer in Marengo. The game department claims there are more deer there than ever. I highly doubt their numbers. We use to see field after field full of deer. Now it is nothing put small groups and ones and twos here and there. Correct me if I am wrong. I thought they WDFW told us there were too many elk in the St. Helens GMUs, so they increased the special permits to thin the herds. I beleive their goal was to reduce the herds to satisfy Weyco? Sombody chim in please. Hunt Phool....you are the EXPERT on here. Now lone us your EXPERTISE...Your being called upon-LOL I'm no expert skywalker but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night .
Quote from: Skyvalhunter on March 21, 2013, 07:57:10 PMOne of the problems is that the WDFW can make the numbers look however they want them. An example is the deer populations thru out the state. Back in the 80's and 90's the state said the deer population was just the right in areas like the Entiat, Methow, Chiwawa. Now if you listen to the biologists the deer populations are once again just right even though they are not even close to what they used to be. The same thing has happened with the Saint Helens and the Clockum elk herds so if they want to say that the wolves are having no effect on the deer or elk populations they will adjust the numbers accordingly.I agree with you. Years ago we had way more deer in Marengo. The game department claims there are more deer there than ever. I highly doubt their numbers. We use to see field after field full of deer. Now it is nothing put small groups and ones and twos here and there. Correct me if I am wrong. I thought they WDFW told us there were too many elk in the St. Helens GMUs, so they increased the special permits to thin the herds. I beleive their goal was to reduce the herds to satisfy Weyco? Sombody chim in please. Hunt Phool....you are the EXPERT on here. Now lone us your EXPERTISE...Your being called upon-LOL
One of the problems is that the WDFW can make the numbers look however they want them. An example is the deer populations thru out the state. Back in the 80's and 90's the state said the deer population was just the right in areas like the Entiat, Methow, Chiwawa. Now if you listen to the biologists the deer populations are once again just right even though they are not even close to what they used to be. The same thing has happened with the Saint Helens and the Clockum elk herds so if they want to say that the wolves are having no effect on the deer or elk populations they will adjust the numbers accordingly.
Skywalker thank you for proving my point.