collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: PHOTOSHOP  (Read 9146 times)

Offline Fl0und3rz

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 51553
  • Location: E. WA
Re: PHOTOSHOP
« Reply #30 on: March 21, 2013, 08:45:01 AM »
If it can be done with GIMP then I would like to see someone do it, if they can then PS would be a waste of money for the OP. :tup:

OK, got you.

Quote
if they can then PS would be a waste of money for the OP.

That is, assuming that OP is in need of all the algorithms and tools that you used to create the modified photo.  Care to share the processes that you used to create the modified photo to test your theory?

Offline benbo30

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 1318
  • Location: ellensburg, wa
Re: PHOTOSHOP
« Reply #31 on: March 21, 2013, 10:16:04 AM »
personally I think there is a reason gimp is free and ps is $600 ... and yes I can justify spending $600 on ps , and I don't need pmags but if I did Id go buy them and .22lr as well ......

Offline Fl0und3rz

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 51553
  • Location: E. WA
Re: PHOTOSHOP
« Reply #32 on: March 21, 2013, 10:27:53 AM »
personally I think there is a reason gimp is free and ps is $600 ... and yes I can justify spending $600 on ps , and I don't need pmags but if I did Id go buy them and .22lr as well ......

Good to know.  Enjoy.

Offline pencilsketcher

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Nov 2012
  • Posts: 97
  • Location: Goldbar wa
  • Groups: NRA Lifer
Re: PHOTOSHOP
« Reply #33 on: March 23, 2013, 10:25:02 AM »
I still use CS4 with a Wacom Cintiq and never have never used gimp. but i just downloaded it. gonna check it out. Free doesnt mean bad, that is how the linux software started.

But on a personnel note I have found that just for photo touch up work, PS elements works well also and I think it is around 100 bucks or so. :twocents:


Offline Bean Counter

  • Site Sponsor
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 13624
Re: PHOTOSHOP
« Reply #34 on: March 23, 2013, 10:39:26 PM »
What about Photoshop Elements for like $150 instead of the flagship model for $600?

Anybody?  :dunno:

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32892
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: PHOTOSHOP
« Reply #35 on: March 23, 2013, 11:36:42 PM »
What about Photoshop Elements for like $150 instead of the flagship model for $600?

Anybody?  :dunno:
For that price I would consider Lightroom.
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline Alchase

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 20319
  • Location: Tinker AFB, OK
Re: PHOTOSHOP
« Reply #36 on: March 25, 2013, 07:24:22 AM »
I have both Photoshop and Lightroom, I use Lightroom for 95% of the photo editing I do. Plus the organization ability of Lightroom is awesome.

I tried Elements, for around the same price, Lightroom was a much better deal.
IMHO
Only 2 defining forces sacrificed themselves for you:
The American Soldier and Jesus Christ. One died for your freedom, the other for your soul.

My rock,
He trains my hands for war and my fingers for battle.
Psalm 144.1

Offline Bean Counter

  • Site Sponsor
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 13624
Re: PHOTOSHOP
« Reply #37 on: March 25, 2013, 09:44:24 PM »
THanks guys  :tup:

Offline Kola16

  • <><
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 3392
  • Location: Roy
  • Go Cougs!
Re: PHOTOSHOP
« Reply #38 on: March 26, 2013, 12:37:12 AM »
I am not familiar with the useability of PS, but if you are up for a cheaper option (free) try GIMP.
I use gimp because it is free...... :chuckle: It works fine, but if I were a photographer like some on here I would want something else......
Im not familiar with GIMP either but I have a hard time believing a free software is going to be as useful as a $600 PS software. If it is then a lot of us really got taken to the cleaners. :chuckle:

 :chuckle:
Lets see you do this with GIMP. ;)
Ok, I kind of found the button you hit  :dunno: :chuckle:
If guns kill people...then pencils misspell words, cars make people drive drunk, and spoons made Rosie O'Donnell fat!

"God is great, beer is good, and people are crazy!"   -Billy Currington

Offline Tom Reichner

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 425
  • Location: Omak, Washington
Re: PHOTOSHOP
« Reply #39 on: March 27, 2013, 10:35:07 PM »
I really just use iPhoto, the free program that comes already loaded onto every Apple computer.  I currently have Aperture and Lightroom, and have had Photoshop in the past.  However, I just like iPhoto more. It isn't a very "powerful" editing program, but then again I don't feel the need to do any heavy editing - just slight adjustments to exposure and color balance.  As far as I'm concerned, it is the best program out there in terms of photo management (organizing large amounts of images). 

In iPhoto, when I click on something, or make an adjustment using the slider, whatever I've done happens immediately.  In the other "professional" programs, whenever I click on something, or move a slider, it takes a second or two for the adjustment to "happen".  That's too slow for me.  I just prefer the ease and speed of the basic iPhoto program.
Wildlife Photographed in the Wild
my website:  http://www.tomreichner.com/Wildlife

Offline Bean Counter

  • Site Sponsor
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 13624
Re: PHOTOSHOP
« Reply #40 on: March 28, 2013, 08:09:40 AM »
Tom,
iPhoto is nice for the items you mentioned, but I have difficulty resizing and cropping images in it. Also, I am at as to how to insert text to copyright the photo. Can you offer any tips for this?
Thanks.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Mudflow Archery by Ridgerunner
[Today at 02:07:06 PM]


Swakane Ram by hillbillyhunting
[Today at 12:21:34 PM]


Selkirk bull moose. by JakeLand
[Today at 12:16:29 PM]


Mason County Youth Buck Nov 1-16 by Sundance
[Today at 11:36:57 AM]


I’m on a blacktail mission by Sundance
[Today at 11:34:34 AM]


Rimrock Bull: Modern by zagsfan1
[Today at 11:00:13 AM]


Sportsman Alliance files petition to Gov Ferguson for removal of corrupt WA Wildlife Commissioners by dreamingbig
[Today at 10:44:31 AM]


Getting back into dogs by Machias
[Today at 10:40:03 AM]


VA Loan Closing Costs by pianoman9701
[Today at 10:20:51 AM]


DR Brush Mower won't crank by Sandberm
[Today at 09:58:05 AM]


After a couple years of poor health,... by Skillet
[Today at 08:49:46 AM]


Colockum Archery Bull Tag by Gonehuntin01
[Today at 07:15:15 AM]


Drew Cleman Mountain Any Ram! by starbailey
[Today at 07:04:50 AM]


Anybody hunt with a 25 Creedmoor? by Threewolves
[Today at 05:58:47 AM]


2025 OILS! by oldschool
[Today at 05:33:29 AM]


September mule deer velvet by jstone
[Yesterday at 08:43:04 PM]


Jim Horn's elk calling, instructional audio CD's. by WapitiTalk1
[Yesterday at 07:40:33 PM]


Goose hunting with vice grips by Pegasus
[Yesterday at 04:51:23 PM]


Public Land Sale Senate Budget Reconciliation by GeoSwan
[Yesterday at 04:12:47 PM]


Back up camera by Blacklab
[Yesterday at 11:54:30 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal