collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Thurston County Wolf  (Read 11243 times)

Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34512
  • Location: NE Corner
Re: Thurston County Wolf
« Reply #15 on: October 04, 2013, 11:12:22 PM »
I got lamblasted on this thread for suggesting people raised these things and turned them loose not so long ago.
http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,134729.0.html




Offline mulehunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2008
  • Posts: 3367
  • Location: Hobart, Wa
Re: Thurston County Wolf
« Reply #16 on: October 04, 2013, 11:22:55 PM »
 :bfg:



:peep:

Offline Becky

  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2013
  • Posts: 5481
  • Location: Roy
Re: Thurston County Wolf
« Reply #17 on: October 05, 2013, 10:11:48 AM »
Certainly possible, unlikely any of the wolfers follow the genetics close enough to accomplish it.  Sixth generation would be more than 98%, getting exactly 98% would take some careful back crosses.

 :yeah: I've done a lot of research of domesticated/hybrid bred animals back in the day. I used to have a bengal cat and wanted a savannah cat - that stemmed my fascination. Anyways all that aside, to get past the laws in this state in order to own a "wolf" it has to be a hybrid. 98% is extremely steep and he has SEVERAL (read through the news article I posted last, he breeds them). To maintain this high of percentage, there are lots of near-wolf generations there to continue that breeding. It's not a simple F1 breeding.

Offline AspenBud

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 1742
  • Location: Washington
Re: Thurston County Wolf
« Reply #18 on: October 06, 2013, 08:56:38 AM »
I got lamblasted on this thread for suggesting people raised these things and turned them loose not so long ago.
http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,134729.0.html

You got lambasted when someone thought you said WOLVES were released and then didn't point out to the person that you said you saw hybrids released, not wolves. At 98% the dog may look like a wolf and act like a wolf but it is not a wolf. Or to put it another way, you can shoot it.

People have raised hybrids for years in this state and some have gotten loose, that's not really a debate. But it wasn't because of some government plot, it was because of stupid people wanting "Fluffy" to run free and "Fluffy" was not a wolf.

Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34512
  • Location: NE Corner
Re: Thurston County Wolf
« Reply #19 on: October 06, 2013, 09:38:25 AM »
I got lamblasted on this thread for suggesting people raised these things and turned them loose not so long ago.
http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,134729.0.html

You got lambasted when someone thought you said WOLVES were released and then didn't point out to the person that you said you saw hybrids released, not wolves. At 98% the dog may look like a wolf and act like a wolf but it is not a wolf. Or to put it another way, you can shoot it.

People have raised hybrids for years in this state and some have gotten loose, that's not really a debate. But it wasn't because of some government plot, it was because of stupid people wanting "Fluffy" to run free and "Fluffy" was not a wolf.

This is the most ridiculous post I've seen in ahwile.    :bash:

You can't shoot a hybrid, sure legally you can but how the hell are you going to know it's a hybrid?   I won't shoot a hybrid, not when I can't identify it w/o a freaking DNA sample  :bash:

So for all intensive purposes to us laymen in the field, it's a freaking wolf. 


If this "hybrid" which got this thread going were out in the woods chewing on your bird dog you could not do a dang thing about it being on western portion of the state - or are you such a wolf expert you'd be able to identify that 2% other than wolf DNA? 


 




Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 38520
  • Location: Idaho<->Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, NWTF, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
Re: Thurston County Wolf
« Reply #20 on: October 06, 2013, 10:08:35 AM »
I got lamblasted on this thread for suggesting people raised these things and turned them loose not so long ago.
http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,134729.0.html

You got lambasted when someone thought you said WOLVES were released and then didn't point out to the person that you said you saw hybrids released, not wolves. At 98% the dog may look like a wolf and act like a wolf but it is not a wolf. Or to put it another way, you can shoot it.

People have raised hybrids for years in this state and some have gotten loose, that's not really a debate. But it wasn't because of some government plot, it was because of stupid people wanting "Fluffy" to run free and "Fluffy" was not a wolf.

This is the most ridiculous post I've seen in ahwile.    :bash:

You can't shoot a hybrid, sure legally you can but how the hell are you going to know it's a hybrid?   I won't shoot a hybrid, not when I can't identify it w/o a freaking DNA sample  :bash:

So for all intensive purposes to us laymen in the field, it's a freaking wolf. 


If this "hybrid" which got this thread going were out in the woods chewing on your bird dog you could not do a dang thing about it being on western portion of the state - or are you such a wolf expert you'd be able to identify that 2% other than wolf DNA?

 :yeah:  exactly right
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw needed) for spring bear, fall bear, bison, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, & wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered

Offline lokidog

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 15186
  • Location: Sultan/Wisconsin
Re: Thurston County Wolf
« Reply #21 on: October 06, 2013, 10:26:38 AM »



If this "hybrid" which got this thread going were out in the woods chewing on your bird dog you could not do a dang thing about it being on western portion of the state - or are you such a wolf expert you'd be able to identify that 2% other than wolf DNA?

If this was attacking my dog, it looks like an aggressive dog attacking my pet, IT IS GOING DOWN, I don't give a crap what it looks like or might be or where I might be.   :twocents:

Offline WAcoyotehunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 4457
  • Location: Pend Oreille County
Re: Thurston County Wolf
« Reply #22 on: October 06, 2013, 10:39:20 AM »
pretty fat looking.  I wouldn't want that thing in my yard...

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 38520
  • Location: Idaho<->Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, NWTF, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
Re: Thurston County Wolf
« Reply #23 on: October 06, 2013, 10:49:05 AM »
There were hybrids turned loose in GMU 121, half the county knows the story, I seriously wonder if the huckleberry pack is 98%?
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw needed) for spring bear, fall bear, bison, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, & wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39203
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Thurston County Wolf
« Reply #24 on: October 06, 2013, 11:00:25 AM »
There needs to be a new law to ban the possession of hybrid wolves. There's no logical reason why anyone should have a hybrid wolf. Besides, how the heck do you get a hybrid? You would have to start out by breeding a wolf to a dog. How is that legal?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free

Offline JLS

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 4623
  • Location: In my last tracks.....
  • Groups: Support the LWCF!
Re: Thurston County Wolf
« Reply #25 on: October 06, 2013, 11:05:02 AM »
There needs to be a new law to ban the possession of hybrid wolves. There's no logical reason why anyone should have a hybrid wolf. Besides, how the heck do you get a hybrid? You would have to start out by breeding a wolf to a dog. How is that legal?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free

I completely agree.
Matthew 7:13-14

Offline Sitka_Blacktail

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 3395
  • Location: Hoquiam, WA
Re: Thurston County Wolf
« Reply #26 on: October 06, 2013, 11:20:46 AM »
There needs to be a new law to ban the possession of hybrid wolves. There's no logical reason why anyone should have a hybrid wolf. Besides, how the heck do you get a hybrid? You would have to start out by breeding a wolf to a dog. How is that legal?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free

I completely agree.

I also agree. It is illegal to possess hybrids in Alaska.
A man who fears suffering is already suffering from what he fears. ~ Michel de Montaigne

Offline snowpack

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2013
  • Posts: 2522
  • Location: the high country
Re: Thurston County Wolf
« Reply #27 on: October 06, 2013, 11:42:08 AM »
I wouldn't support a new law on banning wolf pets, I would go in the other direction--modifying/reducing the existing laws such that 'wolves' can be killed year round with no bag limit.

Offline AspenBud

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 1742
  • Location: Washington
Re: Thurston County Wolf
« Reply #28 on: October 06, 2013, 02:03:19 PM »
I got lamblasted on this thread for suggesting people raised these things and turned them loose not so long ago.
http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,134729.0.html

You got lambasted when someone thought you said WOLVES were released and then didn't point out to the person that you said you saw hybrids released, not wolves. At 98% the dog may look like a wolf and act like a wolf but it is not a wolf. Or to put it another way, you can shoot it.

People have raised hybrids for years in this state and some have gotten loose, that's not really a debate. But it wasn't because of some government plot, it was because of stupid people wanting "Fluffy" to run free and "Fluffy" was not a wolf.

This is the most ridiculous post I've seen in ahwile.    :bash:

You can't shoot a hybrid, sure legally you can but how the hell are you going to know it's a hybrid?   I won't shoot a hybrid, not when I can't identify it w/o a freaking DNA sample  :bash:

So for all intensive purposes to us laymen in the field, it's a freaking wolf. 


If this "hybrid" which got this thread going were out in the woods chewing on your bird dog you could not do a dang thing about it being on western portion of the state - or are you such a wolf expert you'd be able to identify that 2% other than wolf DNA?


No need to be sore. I agree with you.

But my point is you can't claim you saw wolves released when you did not. You saw hybrids released. They are not the Canadian wolves that wolfbait et al hoot about and those hybrids were not part of some government plot.
,





Sent from my RM-917_nam_usa_100 using Tapatalk

Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34512
  • Location: NE Corner
Re: Thurston County Wolf
« Reply #29 on: October 06, 2013, 09:33:27 PM »
I don't know what they were,  they could have been a true wolf or a hybrid - I accidently forgot my secret DNA decoder ring I got from a box of cracker jacks.
Those secret rings were all the rage in 1983.

Hybrid or not, they kill animals and domestic livestock just like a real wolf does and we can't control them because we don't know they aren't real wolves.  The risk is far too great to make a mistake and shoot a real wolf thinking it was a hybrid.


Say what do you get when you cross an escaped 98% hybrid with a real wolf?   I don't know either, but I can tell you they'll act just like a real wolf.
« Last Edit: October 06, 2013, 09:47:24 PM by KFhunter »

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

AUCTION: SE Idaho DIY Deer or Deer/Elk Hunt by Dan-o
[Today at 10:28:23 AM]


Utah cow elk hunt by kselkhunter
[Today at 09:03:55 AM]


KODIAK06 2025 trail cam and personal pics thread by kodiak06
[Today at 07:03:46 AM]


Unknown Suppressors - Whisper Pickle by Sneaky
[Today at 04:09:53 AM]


Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn! by HillHound
[Yesterday at 11:25:17 PM]


THE ULTIMATE QUAD!!!! by Deer slayer
[Yesterday at 10:33:55 PM]


Archery elk gear, 2025. by WapitiTalk1
[Yesterday at 09:41:28 PM]


Oregon spring bear by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 04:40:38 PM]


Tree stand for Western Washingtn by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 04:37:01 PM]


Pocket Carry by BKMFR
[Yesterday at 03:34:12 PM]


A lonely Job... by Loup Loup
[Yesterday at 01:15:11 PM]


Range finders & Angle Compensation by Fidelk
[Yesterday at 11:58:48 AM]


Willapa Hills 1 Bear by hunter399
[Yesterday at 10:55:29 AM]


Bearpaw Outfitters Annual July 4th Hunt Sale by bearpaw
[Yesterday at 08:40:03 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal