Free: Contests & Raffles.
You determine your ethics not anyone else.
Quote from: 92xj on May 22, 2015, 05:05:14 PMYou determine your ethics not anyone else.Yes and no. Ethics are highly influenced by your community and culture and variable according to those contexts. Imagine what people would do if there were no other people around.
I don't think that's what's happening but communities do you shape ethics, we are doing it right now in this thread
Quote from: Odell on May 27, 2015, 06:23:45 PMI don't think that's what's happening but communities do you shape ethics, we are doing it right now in this thread No one is around 99% of the time when I shoot my elk/deer every year.. that has no bearing on what shot I will or will not take.
Bowhunting is/should be, a close range sport. When i take my bow to the feild, it is for the challenge. Getting in close, not seeing how far i can shoot. I desire the memory of the hunt more then a head on the wall...just my opinion...
Quote from: mountainman on May 27, 2015, 09:55:07 PMBowhunting is/should be, a close range sport. When i take my bow to the feild, it is for the challenge. Getting in close, not seeing how far i can shoot. I desire the memory of the hunt more then a head on the wall...just my opinion... the only issue with your assumption is that you assume all longer shots required less hunting, I have killed bucks from 70 yrds that I stalked from over 600 in open country.... 70 in that terrain and situation was as tough to get too as 15 on elk or deer in certain terrains/cover... not all things are equal. My elk at 94.. I literally ran out of cover... so as much as I like 15-50 yrds.... I prefer meat in my freezer so I took a shot I kn ow I can make and I did.... I feel no more like a hunter when I shoot something under 10 yrds then when I do at 60+.
Quote from: BABackcountryBwhntr on May 28, 2015, 01:15:02 PMQuote from: mountainman on May 27, 2015, 09:55:07 PMBowhunting is/should be, a close range sport. When i take my bow to the feild, it is for the challenge. Getting in close, not seeing how far i can shoot. I desire the memory of the hunt more then a head on the wall...just my opinion... the only issue with your assumption is that you assume all longer shots required less hunting, I have killed bucks from 70 yrds that I stalked from over 600 in open country.... 70 in that terrain and situation was as tough to get too as 15 on elk or deer in certain terrains/cover... not all things are equal. My elk at 94.. I literally ran out of cover... so as much as I like 15-50 yrds.... I prefer meat in my freezer so I took a shot I kn ow I can make and I did.... I feel no more like a hunter when I shoot something under 10 yrds then when I do at 60+. Yup. I shot a buck at 50 yards that was more of a challenge than a bull at 8 ft. The bull was dumb luck but it was within spitting distance.
Quote from: Jonathan_S on May 28, 2015, 01:24:32 PMQuote from: BABackcountryBwhntr on May 28, 2015, 01:15:02 PMQuote from: mountainman on May 27, 2015, 09:55:07 PMBowhunting is/should be, a close range sport. When i take my bow to the feild, it is for the challenge. Getting in close, not seeing how far i can shoot. I desire the memory of the hunt more then a head on the wall...just my opinion... the only issue with your assumption is that you assume all longer shots required less hunting, I have killed bucks from 70 yrds that I stalked from over 600 in open country.... 70 in that terrain and situation was as tough to get too as 15 on elk or deer in certain terrains/cover... not all things are equal. My elk at 94.. I literally ran out of cover... so as much as I like 15-50 yrds.... I prefer meat in my freezer so I took a shot I kn ow I can make and I did.... I feel no more like a hunter when I shoot something under 10 yrds then when I do at 60+. Yup. I shot a buck at 50 yards that was more of a challenge than a bull at 8 ft. The bull was dumb luck but it was within spitting distance.dont get me wrong. I agree, to a point. But I see a trend, here in type, and in the field, of some who actually promote the "long range" shot on game. The ones who can consistently paper plate it at long range (100+) shooting. Too many variables, formost being time of flight.. no matter how you slice it, it is always a low percentge shot.
Quote from: mountainman on May 28, 2015, 04:43:36 PMQuote from: Jonathan_S on May 28, 2015, 01:24:32 PMQuote from: BABackcountryBwhntr on May 28, 2015, 01:15:02 PMQuote from: mountainman on May 27, 2015, 09:55:07 PMBowhunting is/should be, a close range sport. When i take my bow to the feild, it is for the challenge. Getting in close, not seeing how far i can shoot. I desire the memory of the hunt more then a head on the wall...just my opinion... well said..the only issue with your assumption is that you assume all longer shots required less hunting, I have killed bucks from 70 yrds that I stalked from over 600 in open country.... 70 in that terrain and situation was as tough to get too as 15 on elk or deer in certain terrains/cover... not all things are equal. My elk at 94.. I literally ran out of cover... so as much as I like 15-50 yrds.... I prefer meat in my freezer so I took a shot I kn ow I can make and I did.... I feel no more like a hunter when I shoot something under 10 yrds then when I do at 60+. Yup. I shot a buck at 50 yards that was more of a challenge than a bull at 8 ft. The bull was dumb luck but it was within spitting distance.dont get me wrong. I agree, to a point. But I see a trend, here in type, and in the field, of some who actually promote the "long range" shot on game. The ones who can consistently paper plate it at long range (100+) shooting. Too many variables, formost being time of flight.. no matter how you slice it, it is always a low percentge shot.Agreed. Ultimately we are weighing probabilities with the decision of life and death in the balance. Bad shots can happen at 8 yards and 80 yards but the probability for something going wrong increases with every yard. I know some on here have great skill with a bow. But no matter how good your skills are, physics take over and you are losing velocity rapidly. I have yet to meet someone with the skill of knowing with certainty if that animal is going to take a step.
Quote from: Jonathan_S on May 28, 2015, 01:24:32 PMQuote from: BABackcountryBwhntr on May 28, 2015, 01:15:02 PMQuote from: mountainman on May 27, 2015, 09:55:07 PMBowhunting is/should be, a close range sport. When i take my bow to the feild, it is for the challenge. Getting in close, not seeing how far i can shoot. I desire the memory of the hunt more then a head on the wall...just my opinion... well said..the only issue with your assumption is that you assume all longer shots required less hunting, I have killed bucks from 70 yrds that I stalked from over 600 in open country.... 70 in that terrain and situation was as tough to get too as 15 on elk or deer in certain terrains/cover... not all things are equal. My elk at 94.. I literally ran out of cover... so as much as I like 15-50 yrds.... I prefer meat in my freezer so I took a shot I kn ow I can make and I did.... I feel no more like a hunter when I shoot something under 10 yrds then when I do at 60+. Yup. I shot a buck at 50 yards that was more of a challenge than a bull at 8 ft. The bull was dumb luck but it was within spitting distance.dont get me wrong. I agree, to a point. But I see a trend, here in type, and in the field, of some who actually promote the "long range" shot on game. The ones who can consistently paper plate it at long range (100+) shooting. Too many variables, formost being time of flight.. no matter how you slice it, it is always a low percentge shot.
Quote from: BABackcountryBwhntr on May 28, 2015, 01:15:02 PMQuote from: mountainman on May 27, 2015, 09:55:07 PMBowhunting is/should be, a close range sport. When i take my bow to the feild, it is for the challenge. Getting in close, not seeing how far i can shoot. I desire the memory of the hunt more then a head on the wall...just my opinion... well said..the only issue with your assumption is that you assume all longer shots required less hunting, I have killed bucks from 70 yrds that I stalked from over 600 in open country.... 70 in that terrain and situation was as tough to get too as 15 on elk or deer in certain terrains/cover... not all things are equal. My elk at 94.. I literally ran out of cover... so as much as I like 15-50 yrds.... I prefer meat in my freezer so I took a shot I kn ow I can make and I did.... I feel no more like a hunter when I shoot something under 10 yrds then when I do at 60+. Yup. I shot a buck at 50 yards that was more of a challenge than a bull at 8 ft. The bull was dumb luck but it was within spitting distance.
Quote from: mountainman on May 27, 2015, 09:55:07 PMBowhunting is/should be, a close range sport. When i take my bow to the feild, it is for the challenge. Getting in close, not seeing how far i can shoot. I desire the memory of the hunt more then a head on the wall...just my opinion... well said..the only issue with your assumption is that you assume all longer shots required less hunting, I have killed bucks from 70 yrds that I stalked from over 600 in open country.... 70 in that terrain and situation was as tough to get too as 15 on elk or deer in certain terrains/cover... not all things are equal. My elk at 94.. I literally ran out of cover... so as much as I like 15-50 yrds.... I prefer meat in my freezer so I took a shot I kn ow I can make and I did.... I feel no more like a hunter when I shoot something under 10 yrds then when I do at 60+.