Free: Contests & Raffles.
You know this happened a year and a half ago, right?
Quote from: pianoman9701 on January 07, 2017, 07:18:50 AMYou know this happened a year and a half ago, right?You know this happened the EPA caused this a year and a half ago, right?
Quote from: JDHasty on January 07, 2017, 07:53:49 AMQuote from: pianoman9701 on January 07, 2017, 07:18:50 AMYou know this happened a year and a half ago, right?You know this happened the EPA caused this a year and a half ago, right?I'm no friend of the EPA, but this spill was caused by a contractor for the EPA. Do you have any information about who the contractor is and what if any penalty they've paid? That would be more pertinent information. As it is, you're posting information we've already seen posted on this site and others. New information would be beneficial. Rehashing old information is not.
Pman I'm pretty sure the contractor didn't want to tear out the damn and told the epa it was a bad idea.
Quote from: pianoman9701 on January 07, 2017, 07:57:05 AMQuote from: JDHasty on January 07, 2017, 07:53:49 AMQuote from: pianoman9701 on January 07, 2017, 07:18:50 AMYou know this happened a year and a half ago, right?You know this happened the EPA caused this a year and a half ago, right?I'm no friend of the EPA, but this spill was caused by a contractor for the EPA. Do you have any information about who the contractor is and what if any penalty they've paid? That would be more pertinent information. As it is, you're posting information we've already seen posted on this site and others. New information would be beneficial. Rehashing old information is not.Here, let me help ya' out: Matthew Daly, Associated Press Updated 4:35 pm, Friday, January 6, 2017 The EPA said its research supports earlier statements that water quality in the affected river system has returned to pre-spill levels.Another Obama Agency investigating itself and coming to the conclusion: There is nothing to see here, move along.
Quote from: Special T on January 07, 2017, 08:28:10 AMPman I'm pretty sure the contractor didn't want to tear out the damn and told the epa it was a bad idea.Is that new news or is that old news. I'm just trying to figure out if this post has anything new to offer.
So one guy makes a mistake and then it is automatically the EPA's fault. That's like blaming Colt for someone using their rifle to shoot up a mall.
The epa guy did this while the boss was on vacation and was under instruction not to breach the mine. Additionally the contractor said it was a bad idea.
Quote from: Special T on January 20, 2017, 10:54:52 PMThe epa guy did this while the boss was on vacation and was under instruction not to breach the mine. Additionally the contractor said it was a bad idea.Put the Govt official in the place of my cousin's neighbor who shot a grizzly bear under his front porch. He lost his butt in legal fees and had fines on top. I have no sympathy, in fact I have a preferential option for the highly trained, and paid govt official facing financial and personal ruin.