collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: "Environmental Group Challenges Aerial Spraying"  (Read 7127 times)

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39214
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
"Environmental Group Challenges Aerial Spraying"
« on: September 26, 2017, 09:58:59 AM »
This is in Snohomish county, will be interesting to see what happens with this. I hope the environmental group is successful.

http://www.monroemonitor.com/Content/News/Homepage-Rotating-Articles/Article/Environmental-group-challenges-aerial-spraying/26/538/10803

Offline Boss .300 winmag

  • FLY NAVAL AVIATION
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+23)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 19193
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • How do you measure trying, you do, or you don’t.
Re: "Environmental Group Challenges Aerial Spraying"
« Reply #1 on: September 26, 2017, 10:09:13 AM »
Need to go back to burning the clear cuts.  :tup:
"Just because I like granola, and I have stretched my arms around a few trees, doesn't mean I'm a tree hugger!
Hi I'm 8156, our leader is Bearpaw.
YOU CANNOT REASON WITH A TIGER WHEN YOUR HEAD IS IN ITS MOUTH! Winston Churchill

Keep Calm And Duc/Ski Doo On!

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 45339
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • Mortgage Licenses in WA, ID, & OR NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: "Environmental Group Challenges Aerial Spraying"
« Reply #2 on: September 26, 2017, 10:14:57 AM »
I don't see the proposal for any non-chemical alternatives, like slash burning. If we could get the EPA to overturn its problems with burning, maybe we could get the timber producers to stop poisoning our forests.  :dunno:
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

Offline Practical Approach

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 692
Re: "Environmental Group Challenges Aerial Spraying"
« Reply #3 on: September 26, 2017, 10:21:33 AM »
So they are suing over pesticides but not herbicides it looks like.  So they are after the bug killing sprays, but not the chemicals that kill vegetation in clear cuts.  Correct?

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 45339
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • Mortgage Licenses in WA, ID, & OR NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: "Environmental Group Challenges Aerial Spraying"
« Reply #4 on: September 26, 2017, 10:27:08 AM »
So they are suing over pesticides but not herbicides it looks like.  So they are after the bug killing sprays, but not the chemicals that kill vegetation in clear cuts.  Correct?

Glyphosate is an herbicide.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39214
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: "Environmental Group Challenges Aerial Spraying"
« Reply #5 on: September 26, 2017, 10:28:12 AM »
So they are suing over pesticides but not herbicides it looks like.  So they are after the bug killing sprays, but not the chemicals that kill vegetation in clear cuts.  Correct?

No, it's herbicides. Not sure why the word "pesticides" is used sometimes.

Offline Practical Approach

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 692
Re: "Environmental Group Challenges Aerial Spraying"
« Reply #6 on: September 26, 2017, 10:31:51 AM »
Thats what I figured, but it frustrates me a bit when the reporters/writers don't get the terminology right.  They are completely different. 

Offline JLS

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 4623
  • Location: In my last tracks.....
  • Groups: Support the LWCF!
Re: "Environmental Group Challenges Aerial Spraying"
« Reply #7 on: September 26, 2017, 10:36:10 AM »
Herbicides are considered a pesticide per EPA definitions.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Matthew 7:13-14

Offline Practical Approach

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 692
Re: "Environmental Group Challenges Aerial Spraying"
« Reply #8 on: September 26, 2017, 10:47:23 AM »
Herbicides are considered a pesticide per EPA definitions.
 Ok, good to know.  Thanks.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Skillet

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+43)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 5855
  • Location: Sitka, AK
Re: "Environmental Group Challenges Aerial Spraying"
« Reply #9 on: September 26, 2017, 10:49:40 AM »
I don't see the proposal for any non-chemical alternatives, like slash burning. If we could get the EPA to overturn its problems with burning, maybe we could get the timber producers to stop poisoning our forests.  :dunno:

Clearcutting (with appropriate stream setbacks) and burning is best IMHO, but until Monsanto figures out a way to patent fire and sell licenses for it back to foresters, I think we're stuck with chemical control.  K street has way too much influence here, IMHO.
KABOOM Count - 1

"The ocean is calling, and I must go."

"Does anyone know where the love of God goes, when the waves turn the minutes to hours?"
     - Gordon Lightfoot

Offline DOUBLELUNG

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5837
  • Location: Wenatchee
Re: "Environmental Group Challenges Aerial Spraying"
« Reply #10 on: September 26, 2017, 11:01:17 AM »
Herbicides are considered a pesticide per EPA definitions.
 Ok, good to know.  Thanks.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes, although pesticide is commonly used interchangeably with insecticide, in the regulatory world pesticide is used globally for all chemicals used to kill unwanted life forms - herbicide, insecticide, fungicide, rodenticide etc.  My Washington State weed control license was officially a "Pesticide Applicator's License with Agricultural Weeds Endorsement".  No need to use 2 words when 7 will do!
As long as we have the habitat, we can argue forever about who gets to kill what and when.  No habitat = no game.

Offline WSU

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 5530
Re: "Environmental Group Challenges Aerial Spraying"
« Reply #11 on: September 26, 2017, 11:24:22 AM »
I don't see the proposal for any non-chemical alternatives, like slash burning. If we could get the EPA to overturn its problems with burning, maybe we could get the timber producers to stop poisoning our forests.  :dunno:

I don't see that slash burning is the issue.  Perhaps I'm wrong.  The spray seems to be used to kill everything in the cut to give the seedlings an advantage when planted.

Offline Sandberm

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2013
  • Posts: 5469
Re: "Environmental Group Challenges Aerial Spraying"
« Reply #12 on: September 26, 2017, 11:41:16 AM »
Wonder what they sprayed to make that womans skin fall off?

Being in farming Ive been exposed to chemicals my whole life and Ive never had anything like that happen. Glyphosphate is one of the safest chemicals around,


Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 45339
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • Mortgage Licenses in WA, ID, & OR NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: "Environmental Group Challenges Aerial Spraying"
« Reply #13 on: September 26, 2017, 01:21:55 PM »
Wonder what they sprayed to make that womans skin fall off?

Being in farming Ive been exposed to chemicals my whole life and Ive never had anything like that happen. Glyphosphate is one of the safest chemicals around,

Yeah, except for the whole non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, birth defects, and autism thing. The concentrates for some of the chemicals sprayed on fields must be handled very carefully until they're diluted for spraying. She may have been exposed to Atrazine and it's quite possible the plane/helo was spraying a cocktail of more than one chemical. If the mixture was not diluted enough, that could also cause skin problems.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

Offline singleshot12

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 3445
  • Location: N.W. Washington
  • WWA,PF
Re: "Environmental Group Challenges Aerial Spraying"
« Reply #14 on: September 26, 2017, 02:42:48 PM »
It's about time something is being done about the blatant use of pesticides poisoning our ecosystem. If the Environmental group is successful we will slowly see an increase of deer, elk, grouse, bear and even the salmon down stream of these tree farms. Hunters, fishermen, and the tribes should be grateful something is finally being done.

People who think that Glyphosphate etc. is safe and doesn't have a lasting negative effect on the environment has been reading the wrong literature :twocents:
NATURE HAS A WAY

"All good things must come to an end"

SEARCHING FOR TRUTH, SEARCHING FOR PURITY, something that doesn't really exist anymore..

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

2025 elk success thread!! by fowl smacker
[Today at 05:58:19 AM]


2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by bearpaw
[Today at 05:54:53 AM]


Any MT deer updates? by bustedoldman
[Today at 04:58:00 AM]


Stevens double barrel 410 by JDHasty
[Today at 04:45:02 AM]


My Wenaha bull by highside74
[Today at 12:29:54 AM]


"Border Lands Conservation Act" courtesy of Mike Lee (R-UT) by IdeehoT
[Yesterday at 11:00:32 PM]


New Hunter by metlhead
[Yesterday at 09:53:51 PM]


Abandoned salmon nets on the Columbia River by metlhead
[Yesterday at 09:51:08 PM]


How is late season whitetail hunting? Good, bad, decent? GMU 105/117? by BrockWeilep
[Yesterday at 09:43:45 PM]


Any word on closers in Hancock Timberland x inc. unit 121 by hunter399
[Yesterday at 09:00:53 PM]


East Side Quail Numbers? by metlhead
[Yesterday at 08:17:09 PM]


Hunting DNR Natural Area Preserves by blackdog
[Yesterday at 06:57:48 PM]


Durable scope advice by Ac04
[Yesterday at 06:55:22 PM]


Anyone own a Hewescraft Sportsman 160? by blackpowderhunter
[Yesterday at 06:49:19 PM]


Taneum Elk Cow tag problem by Fidelk
[Yesterday at 06:37:41 PM]


Throwing a Hail Marry - Late Season Deer or Elk by Remnar
[Yesterday at 06:18:39 PM]


Supreme Court Declines to Hear Corner-Crossing Case by EnglishSetter
[Yesterday at 05:33:03 PM]


Upland bird carry options by EnglishSetter
[Yesterday at 05:23:10 PM]


Camping Spot by Cwyatt4826
[Yesterday at 05:06:18 PM]


Swakane Deer by String Bender
[Yesterday at 04:25:34 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal