Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: wolfbait on December 10, 2017, 02:25:00 PMQuote from: optic2 on December 10, 2017, 02:16:06 PMThere is zero opinion in what you'll read below. Just straight numbers. Success rates as a whole have not gone down, but numbers of hunters have. Before 2006 there weren't any wolves in this state. Total deer harvest of all weapon types, number of hunters, success rateGMU 124 Mount Spokane2006: 2537, 7811, 32.5%2016: 2176, 5917, 36.8%GMU 121 Huckleberry2006: 2405, 7809, 30.8%2016: 2014, 5557, 36.2%GMU 117 49 degrees2006: 1635, 5347, 30.6%2016: 1438, 4981, 28.9%GMU 101 Sherman2006: 1220, 4845, 25.2%2016: 1101, 4124, 26.7%GMU 108 Douglas2006: 465, 1406, 33.1%2016: 458, 1276, 35.9%GMU 111 Aladdin2006: 510, 1718, 29.7%2016: 449, 1511, 29.7%GMU 2242006: 209, 1623, 12.9%2016: 305, 1817, 16.8%GMU 2182006: 201, 1479, 13.6%2016: 251, 1807, 13.9%GMU 2392006: 112, 1060, 10.6%2016: 209, 947, 22.1%GMU 247 Entiat2006: 120, 1299, 9.2%2016: 296, 1699, 17.4%The Statement "Before 2006 there weren't any wolves in this state." Is Total BS! Which makes me wonder about the rest, please explain.. Again people believing only what wdfw feeds them!Maybe it's just an oversight on your part but I do find it ironic you didn't add 113 in there as well which could be argued as one of the most impacted units of any in Washington. But here I'll do it for you.GMU 113 Selkirk2006: 727, 2580, 28.2%2016: 427, 1951, 21.8%
Quote from: optic2 on December 10, 2017, 02:16:06 PMThere is zero opinion in what you'll read below. Just straight numbers. Success rates as a whole have not gone down, but numbers of hunters have. Before 2006 there weren't any wolves in this state. Total deer harvest of all weapon types, number of hunters, success rateGMU 124 Mount Spokane2006: 2537, 7811, 32.5%2016: 2176, 5917, 36.8%GMU 121 Huckleberry2006: 2405, 7809, 30.8%2016: 2014, 5557, 36.2%GMU 117 49 degrees2006: 1635, 5347, 30.6%2016: 1438, 4981, 28.9%GMU 101 Sherman2006: 1220, 4845, 25.2%2016: 1101, 4124, 26.7%GMU 108 Douglas2006: 465, 1406, 33.1%2016: 458, 1276, 35.9%GMU 111 Aladdin2006: 510, 1718, 29.7%2016: 449, 1511, 29.7%GMU 2242006: 209, 1623, 12.9%2016: 305, 1817, 16.8%GMU 2182006: 201, 1479, 13.6%2016: 251, 1807, 13.9%GMU 2392006: 112, 1060, 10.6%2016: 209, 947, 22.1%GMU 247 Entiat2006: 120, 1299, 9.2%2016: 296, 1699, 17.4%The Statement "Before 2006 there weren't any wolves in this state." Is Total BS! Which makes me wonder about the rest, please explain..
There is zero opinion in what you'll read below. Just straight numbers. Success rates as a whole have not gone down, but numbers of hunters have. Before 2006 there weren't any wolves in this state. Total deer harvest of all weapon types, number of hunters, success rateGMU 124 Mount Spokane2006: 2537, 7811, 32.5%2016: 2176, 5917, 36.8%GMU 121 Huckleberry2006: 2405, 7809, 30.8%2016: 2014, 5557, 36.2%GMU 117 49 degrees2006: 1635, 5347, 30.6%2016: 1438, 4981, 28.9%GMU 101 Sherman2006: 1220, 4845, 25.2%2016: 1101, 4124, 26.7%GMU 108 Douglas2006: 465, 1406, 33.1%2016: 458, 1276, 35.9%GMU 111 Aladdin2006: 510, 1718, 29.7%2016: 449, 1511, 29.7%GMU 2242006: 209, 1623, 12.9%2016: 305, 1817, 16.8%GMU 2182006: 201, 1479, 13.6%2016: 251, 1807, 13.9%GMU 2392006: 112, 1060, 10.6%2016: 209, 947, 22.1%GMU 247 Entiat2006: 120, 1299, 9.2%2016: 296, 1699, 17.4%
Quote from: fishngamereaper on December 10, 2017, 09:54:47 AMPictures or it didn't happen....Or the true story...wolf found dead when collared moose showed inactive. Wolf found dead next to partially eaten moose carcass. Cause of death, appears wolf choked on moose collar.No pics FAKE NEWS, they’ll do anything to push thier agenda on the state. Heck for all we know they could have been killed in Idaho, and brought here. Look at what’s going on in our political arena these days with all the fake accusations.
Pictures or it didn't happen....Or the true story...wolf found dead when collared moose showed inactive. Wolf found dead next to partially eaten moose carcass. Cause of death, appears wolf choked on moose collar.
Quit shooting wolves with collars........
I wonder how WDFW will afford to pay for all the damage that wolves are doing when the average hunter finally stops buying a license because there are no game animals left to hunt? This liberal state and game department brushes this all under the rug (kind of like hoof rot) and only pushes their liberal agenda.I'm about done with hunting this state and would gladly donate my license and permit fees to some group to fight Conservation NW and other similar groups if I thought it would make a prayers chance in hell difference. I don't even care that I have nearly 20 points across the board for OIL and quality applications because look at the state of our herds. WDFW puts more time, money and energy into predators than they do game animals, which is ass backwards.We as hunters (the real conservationists) could probably break them in a couple years if we simply stopped laying money out there and stopped drinking WDFW's koolaid, but that won't happen with the permit system in place. I have no problem with paying a little more and hunting other western states that actually manage game. We should take a lesson from the anti's because one thing they do way better than us hunters is band together for whatever the agenda is they are pushing.Wake up and smell the roses guys because they smell like *censored* and we are the ones paying for the wolf reintroduction program while allowing our herds to be destroyed. Rant over for now.
Quote from: lokidog on December 10, 2017, 06:04:05 PMQuit shooting wolves with collars........That's advised...