Free: Contests & Raffles.
Two major fires in three years in this area. Then Game Dept controlled burns even during hunting season both times.Road grading and surface rolling throughout both sides of the Rock Creek Drainage. Scheduled during the middle of the hunting season?One controlled burn was in preparation of a Fish Habitat Study and smoke blew up the hill through hunting areas and two camps....... on a mostly dry creek??
Quote from: D-Rock425 on November 07, 2019, 12:40:47 PMThe number of cow permits in 2016 and before had a huge influence of where we are now. :yeahThe company line was "herds are over objective" and everyone cheered at the increased opportunity. 3 years later, a bunch of fires and a hard winter or two you have low numbers and nobody is happy. Of course the other side of the coin is had they not reduced the number of animals in 2015 and 2016 people would have been screaming at the fact that we lost 100's of animals due to the hard winter that could have been harvested by hunters.Darned if you do and darned if you don't.Hind sight is always 20/20.
The number of cow permits in 2016 and before had a huge influence of where we are now.
Quote from: Rainier10 on November 07, 2019, 01:05:41 PMQuote from: D-Rock425 on November 07, 2019, 12:40:47 PMThe number of cow permits in 2016 and before had a huge influence of where we are now. :yeahThe company line was "herds are over objective" and everyone cheered at the increased opportunity. 3 years later, a bunch of fires and a hard winter or two you have low numbers and nobody is happy. Of course the other side of the coin is had they not reduced the number of animals in 2015 and 2016 people would have been screaming at the fact that we lost 100's of animals due to the hard winter that could have been harvested by hunters.Darned if you do and darned if you don't.Hind sight is always 20/20.The problem with them saying numbers are over objective had nothing to do with the herd health. They did a study and felt that the ground was getting over grazed, so instead of limiting sheep or cattle numbers they wanted to reduce elk numbers. Complete incompetence!!!
Quote from: borntoslay on November 07, 2019, 02:24:21 PMQuote from: borntoslay on November 07, 2019, 02:23:24 PMQuote from: stlusn30-06 on November 07, 2019, 02:14:43 PMJust doing some quick internet research:1.) Hoof disease has taken a heavy toll over the last decade2.) Winter of 2016 took out 30-35% of the St. Helens heard. Assume winter 2016 had impact on most of the eastside heards3.) Natives take ~8% of the annual deer and elk harvest state wide. According to facts, they are not out slaughtering entire heards as other have indicated. 4.) Increased predator pressure is impacting elk numbers, and maybe more importantly, changing heard behavior. They are moving into heavier cover, more remote, and rugged country. 5.) While some areas are hurting, others are complaining about how big the Colockum herd is and how much damage it is causing. Montana and Idaho have more wolves, bears, and around as many cats as Washington. Their Elk/deer pops are doing alright. It's fairly consistent on here that the same people that hate the idea of predators talk of going to hunt states with larger predator populations. Just an observation. It's ironic.Thanks for that, although I think the wolves in Idaho (panhandle) are destroying game herds they worked 50 years to restoreSent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalkand that's with open wolf seasonSent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk correct with a year round open season on wolves(private land) and a liberal trapping season. I think its helping the elk with the wolf seasons but still no where like it was before wolves . NO WAY Idaho has even as many cats and bears as Washington, to suggest we have more cats and bears is crazy
Quote from: borntoslay on November 07, 2019, 02:23:24 PMQuote from: stlusn30-06 on November 07, 2019, 02:14:43 PMJust doing some quick internet research:1.) Hoof disease has taken a heavy toll over the last decade2.) Winter of 2016 took out 30-35% of the St. Helens heard. Assume winter 2016 had impact on most of the eastside heards3.) Natives take ~8% of the annual deer and elk harvest state wide. According to facts, they are not out slaughtering entire heards as other have indicated. 4.) Increased predator pressure is impacting elk numbers, and maybe more importantly, changing heard behavior. They are moving into heavier cover, more remote, and rugged country. 5.) While some areas are hurting, others are complaining about how big the Colockum herd is and how much damage it is causing. Montana and Idaho have more wolves, bears, and around as many cats as Washington. Their Elk/deer pops are doing alright. It's fairly consistent on here that the same people that hate the idea of predators talk of going to hunt states with larger predator populations. Just an observation. It's ironic.Thanks for that, although I think the wolves in Idaho (panhandle) are destroying game herds they worked 50 years to restoreSent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalkand that's with open wolf seasonSent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
Quote from: stlusn30-06 on November 07, 2019, 02:14:43 PMJust doing some quick internet research:1.) Hoof disease has taken a heavy toll over the last decade2.) Winter of 2016 took out 30-35% of the St. Helens heard. Assume winter 2016 had impact on most of the eastside heards3.) Natives take ~8% of the annual deer and elk harvest state wide. According to facts, they are not out slaughtering entire heards as other have indicated. 4.) Increased predator pressure is impacting elk numbers, and maybe more importantly, changing heard behavior. They are moving into heavier cover, more remote, and rugged country. 5.) While some areas are hurting, others are complaining about how big the Colockum herd is and how much damage it is causing. Montana and Idaho have more wolves, bears, and around as many cats as Washington. Their Elk/deer pops are doing alright. It's fairly consistent on here that the same people that hate the idea of predators talk of going to hunt states with larger predator populations. Just an observation. It's ironic.Thanks for that, although I think the wolves in Idaho (panhandle) are destroying game herds they worked 50 years to restoreSent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
Just doing some quick internet research:1.) Hoof disease has taken a heavy toll over the last decade2.) Winter of 2016 took out 30-35% of the St. Helens heard. Assume winter 2016 had impact on most of the eastside heards3.) Natives take ~8% of the annual deer and elk harvest state wide. According to facts, they are not out slaughtering entire heards as other have indicated. 4.) Increased predator pressure is impacting elk numbers, and maybe more importantly, changing heard behavior. They are moving into heavier cover, more remote, and rugged country. 5.) While some areas are hurting, others are complaining about how big the Colockum herd is and how much damage it is causing. Montana and Idaho have more wolves, bears, and around as many cats as Washington. Their Elk/deer pops are doing alright. It's fairly consistent on here that the same people that hate the idea of predators talk of going to hunt states with larger predator populations. Just an observation. It's ironic.
Quote from: idaho guy on November 07, 2019, 04:18:56 PMQuote from: borntoslay on November 07, 2019, 02:24:21 PMQuote from: borntoslay on November 07, 2019, 02:23:24 PMQuote from: stlusn30-06 on November 07, 2019, 02:14:43 PMJust doing some quick internet research:1.) Hoof disease has taken a heavy toll over the last decade2.) Winter of 2016 took out 30-35% of the St. Helens heard. Assume winter 2016 had impact on most of the eastside heards3.) Natives take ~8% of the annual deer and elk harvest state wide. According to facts, they are not out slaughtering entire heards as other have indicated. 4.) Increased predator pressure is impacting elk numbers, and maybe more importantly, changing heard behavior. They are moving into heavier cover, more remote, and rugged country. 5.) While some areas are hurting, others are complaining about how big the Colockum herd is and how much damage it is causing. Montana and Idaho have more wolves, bears, and around as many cats as Washington. Their Elk/deer pops are doing alright. It's fairly consistent on here that the same people that hate the idea of predators talk of going to hunt states with larger predator populations. Just an observation. It's ironic.Thanks for that, although I think the wolves in Idaho (panhandle) are destroying game herds they worked 50 years to restoreSent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalkand that's with open wolf seasonSent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk correct with a year round open season on wolves(private land) and a liberal trapping season. I think its helping the elk with the wolf seasons but still no where like it was before wolves . NO WAY Idaho has even as many cats and bears as Washington, to suggest we have more cats and bears is crazyBears according to each states Fish and Wildlife Dept: WA = 25-30,000 ID= 20-30,000. Idaho doesn't have cat numbers apparently. Independent orgs put the cat numbers at roughly the same. Apologies. Not more of those species. Same numbers.