collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: HB1685 - WDFW Commission Bill  (Read 7322 times)

Offline Practical Approach

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 692
HB1685 - WDFW Commission Bill
« on: January 28, 2025, 03:29:03 PM »
I am not sure what to make of this one.  Initially I am suspicious and skeptical.


https://app.leg.wa.gov/billsummary/?BillNumber=1685&Year=2025&Initiative=false

Offline Mtnwalker

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2015
  • Posts: 2418
  • Location: Selah
Re: HB1685 - WDFW Commission Bill
« Reply #1 on: January 28, 2025, 03:49:26 PM »
I'm not the sharpest bulb in the drawer so maybe I'm reading this wrong, but basically they want the current commission and the governor (Ferguson) to appoint the new director who is now in charge of a bunch of stuff that the commission was previously in charge of... am I close here?

Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 10706
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
Re: HB1685 - WDFW Commission Bill
« Reply #2 on: January 28, 2025, 03:55:22 PM »
I'm not the sharpest bulb in the drawer so maybe I'm reading this wrong, but basically they want the current commission and the governor (Ferguson) to appoint the new director who is now in charge of a bunch of stuff that the commission was previously in charge of... am I close here?
That's how I read it as well.  What could go wrong there :chuckle:
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

Online Rainier10

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 16223
  • Location: Over the edge
Re: HB1685 - WDFW Commission Bill
« Reply #3 on: January 28, 2025, 03:56:53 PM »
I’m concerned this part is struck from section 2

((Persons eligible for appointment as director shall have
practical knowledge of the habits and distribution of fish and
wildlife. The director shall supervise the administration and
operation of the department and perform the duties prescribed by law
and delegated by the commission. The director shall carry out the
basic goals and objectives prescribed under RCW 77.04.055.)
)
Pain is temporary, achieving the goal is worth it.

I didn't say it would be easy, I said it would be worth it.

Every father should remember that one day his children will follow his example instead of his advice.


The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of HuntWa or the site owner.

Offline Mtnwalker

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2015
  • Posts: 2418
  • Location: Selah
Re: HB1685 - WDFW Commission Bill
« Reply #4 on: January 28, 2025, 03:58:56 PM »
I'm not the sharpest bulb in the drawer so maybe I'm reading this wrong, but basically they want the current commission and the governor (Ferguson) to appoint the new director who is now in charge of a bunch of stuff that the commission was previously in charge of... am I close here?
That's how I read it as well.  What could go wrong there :chuckle:

A single source of more power appointed directly by the Governor's office. Color me skeptical

Offline fishngamereaper

  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 8831
  • Location: CDA/CQ
Re: HB1685 - WDFW Commission Bill
« Reply #5 on: January 28, 2025, 04:04:31 PM »
That's like deciding to cut off your right arm or your left arm...

I really don't see a good outcome...

Online Rainier10

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 16223
  • Location: Over the edge
Re: HB1685 - WDFW Commission Bill
« Reply #6 on: January 28, 2025, 04:06:01 PM »
I see the word preserve a lot and I’m concerned at all the stuff struck in section five about maximizing opportunity to hunt and fish.
Pain is temporary, achieving the goal is worth it.

I didn't say it would be easy, I said it would be worth it.

Every father should remember that one day his children will follow his example instead of his advice.


The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of HuntWa or the site owner.

Offline full choke

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 2760
  • Location: Maple Valley
Re: HB1685 - WDFW Commission Bill
« Reply #7 on: January 28, 2025, 04:07:08 PM »
I’m concerned this part is struck from section 2

((Persons eligible for appointment as director shall have
practical knowledge of the habits and distribution of fish and
wildlife. The director shall supervise the administration and
operation of the department and perform the duties prescribed by law
and delegated by the commission. The director shall carry out the
basic goals and objectives prescribed under RCW 77.04.055.)
)

Pretty odd thing to strike out, unless you plan to destroy the way things have historically been run...
"If you think our wars for oil are bad, wait until we are fighting for water..."

Offline MeepDog

  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2021
  • Posts: 722
  • Location: SE Washington
Re: HB1685 - WDFW Commission Bill
« Reply #8 on: January 28, 2025, 04:07:33 PM »
Also this part where the newly appointed person wouldnt have to abide by the same rules the commission currently feels theyre hamstrung by.

Wildlife, fish, and shellfish are the property of the state. The
((commission, director, and the)) department shall preserve, protect,
perpetuate, and manage the wildlife and food fish, game fish, and
shellfish in state waters and offshore waters.

Offline fishngamereaper

  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 8831
  • Location: CDA/CQ
Re: HB1685 - WDFW Commission Bill
« Reply #9 on: January 28, 2025, 04:11:30 PM »
Press release Gov fergtard.
I'd like to congratulate Lorna Smith on her newly appointed position of Director of the wdfw... :mgun2: :stup: :mgun: :mor: :stirthepot: :ban:

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10664
Re: HB1685 - WDFW Commission Bill
« Reply #10 on: January 28, 2025, 05:07:35 PM »
I'm not the sharpest bulb in the drawer so maybe I'm reading this wrong, but basically they want the current commission and the governor (Ferguson) to appoint the new director who is now in charge of a bunch of stuff that the commission was previously in charge of... am I close here?
No.

What the bill does is make the WDFW Director a position appointed by the governor. The commissions authority will be gutted and essentially turned into an advisory commission for the Director.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk


Offline Bushcraft

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 1170
  • Location: Olympic Peninsula
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, NSSF, RMEF, RMGA, MDF, WSF, DU, HHC, WWC, WDAC
Re: HB1685 - WDFW Commission Bill
« Reply #11 on: January 28, 2025, 05:23:05 PM »
Springer and Fitzgibbon. Reps from the 45th and 34th.  What could possibly be their motive?  :chuckle:
Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery. - Winston Churchill

Work hard. Hunt hard. Lift other hunters up.

*Proud supporter of NRA, NRA-ILA SCI, SCIF, SCI-PAC, NSSF, RMEF, RMGA, MDF, WSF, DU, WWA, HHC, WWC

Offline TriggerMike

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2014
  • Posts: 2231
  • Location: Central WA
Re: HB1685 - WDFW Commission Bill
« Reply #12 on: January 28, 2025, 06:17:56 PM »
I'm not the sharpest bulb in the drawer so maybe I'm reading this wrong, but basically they want the current commission and the governor (Ferguson) to appoint the new director who is now in charge of a bunch of stuff that the commission was previously in charge of... am I close here?
No.

What the bill does is make the WDFW Director a position appointed by the governor. The commissions authority will be gutted and essentially turned into an advisory commission for the Director.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
So this is what option #2 in Ruckelshaus report was then?

Offline Mtnwalker

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2015
  • Posts: 2418
  • Location: Selah
Re: HB1685 - WDFW Commission Bill
« Reply #13 on: January 28, 2025, 06:26:24 PM »
I'm not the sharpest bulb in the drawer so maybe I'm reading this wrong, but basically they want the current commission and the governor (Ferguson) to appoint the new director who is now in charge of a bunch of stuff that the commission was previously in charge of... am I close here?
No.

What the bill does is make the WDFW Director a position appointed by the governor. The commissions authority will be gutted and essentially turned into an advisory commission for the Director.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Got it. So the governor (Bob Ferguson) appoints a director who is bestowed with much of the authority that was previously held by the runaway commission. Said runaway commission then serves as an advisory role to the Ferguson-appointed Director. And here I was concerned  :chuckle:

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25063
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: HB1685 - WDFW Commission Bill
« Reply #14 on: January 28, 2025, 06:48:49 PM »
Ferguson  seems more agnostic on wildlife issues than inslee. I his wife isn't an anti. I see this a little differently.  Not sure it's a good thing but Lorna as director isn't gonna happen.
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Montana Cutting Deer Licenses by hughjorgan
[Today at 06:13:46 AM]


Got a great deal on a jet sled by huntnphool
[Today at 12:42:36 AM]


Idaho Non-res hunt draw by Broomd
[Yesterday at 11:37:10 PM]


Eastern Elk Management by buglebuster
[Yesterday at 10:37:48 PM]


The first Moose tags. by tracksoup
[Yesterday at 10:14:29 PM]


Late Alta Muzzy by Gentrys
[Yesterday at 09:43:00 PM]


Coyote hunting with dogs by Barehunter
[Yesterday at 08:12:09 PM]


3 pintails by YoungFowler
[Yesterday at 07:17:53 PM]


One of my favorites this fall by Caseknife
[Yesterday at 06:29:49 PM]


FS Surbu BFG 50 by Tacticalhammer
[Yesterday at 06:24:02 PM]


From Behind by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 05:28:41 PM]


Who knows electric bikes? looking at Quietkat options by CP
[Yesterday at 04:32:25 PM]


My Wenaha bull by Whitenuckles
[Yesterday at 03:29:46 PM]


My Entiat Late tag thread by Whitenuckles
[Yesterday at 03:24:18 PM]


My daughters first deer. by Whitenuckles
[Yesterday at 03:22:51 PM]


Looking for Red Hot Replacement Muzzleloader Nipple 2 SKU: M900013 by Westside88
[Yesterday at 03:10:28 PM]


Selkirk bull moose. by 7mmfan
[Yesterday at 02:23:56 PM]


2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by wadu1
[Yesterday at 01:42:33 PM]


Moose in western washington? by Okanagan
[Yesterday at 01:06:31 PM]


Last day! Don’t leave us hanging by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 01:03:26 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal