Free: Contests & Raffles.
I really don't think that the success rates are very valid in this discusson. If you analyze it a bit more you will notice that the overall 2008 harvest statistics have archery at 9.5% and have modern at 8.5%. Pretty sure a 1% difference is within the standard deviation.also there is a huge difference in success rates of special permit hunts.
I really don't think that the success rates are very valid in this discusson. If you analyze it a bit more you will notice that the overall 2008 harvest statistics have archery at 9.5% and have modern at 8.5%. Pretty sure a 1% difference is within the standard deviation.also there is a huge difference in success rates of special permit hunts. Moderns are always at least 2x as successful as the archers. That tells me that the season dates have little validity in saying that archers are more successful base on the fact that they hunt the rut. What it says is that archers tend to have a higher percentage of experienced hunters. Many times it has come up that the same 5% of hunters kill 90% of the animals.While I agree that the newer archery equipment makes it easier to hold an arrow for longer and has definitely made it possible to have more success you still have to be within 50 yds (yes i know people shoot animals at 60+ but that is rare). what the technology has done is allowed more people to get into archery and have the potential to harvest an animal with a bow that with the old equipment they would not have had that opportunity.
Quote from: Holg3107 on April 16, 2010, 09:12:02 AMI really don't think that the success rates are very valid in this discusson. If you analyze it a bit more you will notice that the overall 2008 harvest statistics have archery at 9.5% and have modern at 8.5%. Pretty sure a 1% difference is within the standard deviation.also there is a huge difference in success rates of special permit hunts.Yes, the success rate I quoted was for general seasons, which is when the majority of elk are killed anyway. 6.2% for modern firearm and 9.1% for archery is fairly significant, I would say.
6.2% for modern firearm and 9.1% for archery is fairly significant, I would say.
but if you look at our historical harvests, as far as TOTALS, NOT PERCENTAGES
Has anyone given any thought to how much more efficient archery equipment has become in recent years? A compound bow from the early 90's is junk compaired to today's arrow flinging devices.Archery seasons are the most liberal because bows are the most primitive.It used to take a ton of skill and practice to get good with a bow now all you need is about a grand and a couple weeks of practice.If we really want to see longer and better seasons, at some point we might need to go back to traditional archery.Just my 2 cents worth.