Free: Contests & Raffles.
I figured 243's may be a little light for elk, but they seem to sure put down a ton of animals every year!
.243 is an awsome gun...thats the only gun ive used to hunt deer with...havent shot anything bigger with it but i wouldnt hesitate to.....heres a couple of the bullets i dug out of the last 2 deer i shot...they are federal premiums with 100gr nosler partitions
Just think how many bulls must have fallen to 150gr Nosler Partitions.........they have what, a 60% weight retention? If the Barnes retains 95%, then the retained wt = 81gr compared to 90 gr with the 150gr Nosler. Therefore, the 85gr Barnes should be almost equal to a 150gr Nosler Partition.
i'm sure with good shot placement it wouls do fine but, i thought you could only hunt elk in washington state with .25 caliber or bigger.
REally, WA doesn't allow the 243 for elk??Thanks for all the input. Yeah, I alive in Montana, have for abotu 12 years now, but was born and raised in Washington. Lived in Duvall for 18 years, then Ellensburg for 5, Silverdale for a couple then Poulsbo for a couple... THEN.... AHHH YEAH.... off to Montana. I enjoy the forum because it reminds me of "home" and I still have LOTS of friends hunting in Washington!
I wouldn't go down to the store and buy a .243 with the intentions of it being my elk rifle. On the other hand,if thats what I had in my hands when a big bull stepped out in front of me,I'd have no issues dropping the hammer.Elk aren't as bullet proof as the internet commandos and Outdoor Life make them out to be. Its all about the shot placement. Shoot them in the guts with a .338 and they'll run for miles. Shoot them in the lungs with a .243 and they die pretty quickly.
When did that change? I have killed elk with a 243 before and it wasn't like that
Elk aren't as bullet proof as the internet commandos and Outdoor Life make them out to be. Its all about the shot placement. Shoot them in the guts with a .338 and they'll run for miles. Shoot them in the lungs with a .243 and they die pretty quickly.