NRA News: UN Doomsday Treaty

[bearpaw]

NRA News: UN Doomsday Treaty With Ginny Simone

NRA News' investigative reporter Ginny Simone takes a look at the global gun control goals of the United Nations. By pushing for a binding international treaty aimed at superseding the U.S. Constitution, the United Nations is committed to rendering Americans' Second Amendment rights to own a firearm meaningless. Simone interviews past and current U.N. officials and politicians and examines the debates at the United Nations Small Arms Summit to expose the international anti-gun agenda.

NRA News: UN Doomsday Treaty With Ginny Simone

[Eli346]

 Wow!That's why I'll just keep buying more guns and ammo. They'll never get mine.

[addicted2hunting]

It will be easy getting mine because i will be dead before they take mine! I hope us as americans will stand united till the end!

[washelkhunter]

Those light blue helmets should make attractive targets. 

[addicted2hunting]

Those light blue helmets should make attractive targets. 

For sure!

This stuff pisses me off! And all the coward a@# liberal americans will just roll over and take it! Or if I even should call them americans.

[MikeWalking]

Those light blue helmets should make attractive targets. 

UN forces come from member nations.  What nation on Earth would actually supply troops to round up American Arms?  Think our Military would allow it?

[washelkhunter]

I was born a free man, i live my life a free man and i will die a free man. But its probably going to be ugly and at least i am consoled by knowing i will not be traveling alone.     Oh it wont be the US Military coming around. It will be homeland security and their ilk. It will strictly be a political play which by and in itself renders it to resistance by rebels such as myself. Or right wing extremist which is what ill be.

[Special T]

It does seem far fetched Mike That they would come for our hunting rifles and such. TRUST is the key in our relationship with our government. Like many of you I have been losing my trust in our elected officials for some time. It has mostly been a slow slide until lately. IF a politician from one of the most corrupt cities in the USA, Chicago, can get elected and reelected then perhaps we should be wary. When we have had freedom loving presidents we had no need to fear our gun rights. Even when we have had what i may consider self serving presidents like Bill Clinton, or Carter we had little to fear because THEY wanted to be re elected...  After election they did not need to push as hard the the left as the current occupant. Perhaps we should cling to our Guns Gold and Religion because those thing are much likelier to provide our freedom than our president.

[Pallindrome]

Forgive me If I'm wrong, but we (USA) are a member in the UN, if this passes we could just withdraw, correct? In which case, an organization which depends on its members to enforce its laws would be rendered unable to enforce anything without its largest militaristic ally... 

[Jingles]

Notice the signature

[Bean Counter]

Those light blue helmets should make attractive targets. 

For sure!

This stuff pisses me off! And all the coward a@# liberal americans will just roll over and take it! Or if I even should call them americans.

No, you should not. I don't. To be American means to love freedom more than life itself. To be free means to fight for your God given rights. Those cowards are slaves in waiting.

"From my cold dead hands."

[Kola16]

Is there any way to make a juggernaut suit 

[addicted2hunting]

Forgive me If I'm wrong, but we (USA) are a member in the UN, if this passes we could just withdraw, correct? In which case, an organization which depends on its members to enforce its laws would be rendered unable to enforce anything without its largest militaristic ally...

correct but.... if you have a government (obama) as PRO U.N. our government will be for the agenda of the U.N. meaning our own troops will be forced to be the ones to take our guns.

[addicted2hunting]

Notice the signature

love the quote!
That is the beating heart of America!

[csaaphill]

first neighbore in need we will need to come to his aid. I would prefer open battle, but beleive that's a pipe dream. I bet it will be one home to the other in the dead of night all in the name of LAW enforcement!!!!.
Hope I'm wrong though.
I will come running though!!!

[3nails]

first neighbore in need we will need to come to his aid. I would prefer open battle, but beleive that's a pipe dream. I bet it will be one home to the other in the dead of night all in the name of LAW enforcement!!!!.
Hope I'm wrong though.
I will come running though!!!

[Bean Counter]

+1

[b.roberts]

Forgive me If I'm wrong, but we (USA) are a member in the UN, if this passes we could just withdraw, correct? In which case, an organization which depends on its members to enforce its laws would be rendered unable to enforce anything without its largest militaristic ally...

They are trying to pass a treaty.  Obama may sign it, but there is no chance of that treaty being ratified in the Senate. 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using Tapatalk 2

[Heredoggydoggy]

Those light blue helmets should make attractive targets. 

UN forces come from member nations.  What nation on Earth would actually supply troops to round up American Arms?  Think our Military would allow it?

Heck, you think our PEOPLE would allow it?  Japan would'nt send troops to invade the US 70 years ago--you think they will NOW?

[jaymark6655]

Those light blue helmets should make attractive targets. 

UN forces come from member nations.  What nation on Earth would actually supply troops to round up American Arms?  Think our Military would allow it?

Heck, you think our PEOPLE would allow it?  Japan would'nt send troops to invade the US 70 years ago--you think they will NOW?

They just might.  It wouldn't be an invasion with the full support of the POTUS.

[Heredoggydoggy]

Those light blue helmets should make attractive targets. 

UN forces come from member nations.  What nation on Earth would actually supply troops to round up American Arms?  Think our Military would allow it?

Heck, you think our PEOPLE would allow it?  Japan would'nt send troops to invade the US 70 years ago--you think they will NOW?

They just might.  It wouldn't be an invasion with the full support of the POTUS.

That's an image I can see in my mind--one UN soldier flanked by 4 liberals armed with a Latte!    

[Jingles]

Forgive me If I'm wrong, but we (USA) are a member in the UN, if this passes we could just withdraw, correct? In which case, an organization which depends on its members to enforce its laws would be rendered unable to enforce anything without its largest militaristic ally...

correct but.... if you have a government (obama) as PRO U.N. our government will be for the agenda of the U.N. meaning our own troops will be forced to be the ones to take our guns.

Not necessarily the oath a service member takes says he will obey the lawful orders of the President and those appointed over them Unless it has changed since I retired I think the majority of the service members would elect to disobey that order knowing it is unconstitutional.  At least I hope that the military would make that decision if not then they become casualties as well

From my cold dead hands surrounded by a large pile of spent brass and a booby trapped body

[h2ofowlr]

Those light blue helmets should make attractive targets. 

UN forces come from member nations.  What nation on Earth would actually supply troops to round up American Arms?  Think our Military would allow it?

My guess is our military would follow the orders of the president who is also pushing this agenda.  Most would roll over.  Unfortunatley if ordered our military would take them from us.

[Heredoggydoggy]

Forgive me If I'm wrong, but we (USA) are a member in the UN, if this passes we could just withdraw, correct? In which case, an organization which depends on its members to enforce its laws would be rendered unable to enforce anything without its largest militaristic ally...

correct but.... if you have a government (obama) as PRO U.N. our government will be for the agenda of the U.N. meaning our own troops will be forced to be the ones to take our guns.

Not necessarily the oath a service member takes says he will obey the lawful orders of the President and those appointed over them Unless it has changed since I retired I think the majority of the service members would elect to disobey that order knowing it is unconstitutional.  At least I hope that the military would make that decision if not then they become casualties as well

From my cold dead hands surrounded by a large pile of spent brass and a booby trapped body

Imagine all the resignations when the surviving military see that It's not as easy as they thought it would be!

[MikeWalking]

...to protect the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic. 

[Bean Counter]

Those light blue helmets should make attractive targets. 

UN forces come from member nations.  What nation on Earth would actually supply troops to round up American Arms?  Think our Military would allow it?

My guess is our military would follow the orders of the president who is also pushing this agenda.  Most would roll over.  Unfortunatley if ordered our military would take them from us.

Most will roll over, and most military/LEO would obey orders. A few will disobey, and a handful of gun owners will have a backbone. I pray that there is enough for deterrent.

[addicted2hunting]

...to protect the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic. 

Is that the actual oath?

If so why arent they doing something???

[csaaphill]

I hope so too although and might shouldn't say online, but there is pvc pipe not for the blewy type of thing but they make really good time capsuls until needed.

[LeeMajors]

While you guys are conspiracy theorizing, please remember that all treaties must be ratified by congress.

[MikeWalking]

...to protect the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic. 

Is that the actual oath?

If so why aren't they doing something???

It's part of the oath I took when I enlisted in 1978.

[crazysccrmd]

Those light blue helmets should make attractive targets. 

UN forces come from member nations.  What nation on Earth would actually supply troops to round up American Arms?  Think our Military would allow it?

My guess is our military would follow the orders of the president who is also pushing this agenda.  Most would roll over.  Unfortunatley if ordered our military would take them from us.

Most will roll over, and most military/LEO would obey orders. A few will disobey, and a handful of gun owners will have a backbone. I pray that there is enough for deterrent.

The military would definitely not be the ones taking your guns. Who's going to do it? The commo, cooks and paper pushers? I can tell you that 90% of the real soldiers (combat arms) would most certainly refuse that order since it would mean turning in our own personal weapons. Just like you guys we are not going to do that.

Of course that would only happen in the foil hat wearing world since this treaty isn't even about taking guns away but rather the better regulation of international arms trade.

[Bean Counter]

While you guys are conspiracy theorizing, please remember that all treaties must be ratified by congress.

Not the House and Senate--just the senate. And it must be done by 2/3rds majority. At least half have already signed its death warrant on arrival. Thank God.

[csaaphill]

ya it's a good thing but need to see. I remember back in the 90's people never thought that in australia gun confiscation would come but it did. While in the NRA I went to a meeting when they were trying to pass that one law that would confiscate guns if passed. While there I got one of the VHS tapes that were on the table with other literature. I viewed it later on and it did show how anti gun politics won out in that country and confiscated their guns. Even a family heirloom was considered contraband. Yes were one of the only Countries with a second ammendment, but believe it will and can happen here. All it takes is enough people here to get tired of guns and elect enough House and Senators and wham her it comes. With Obamacare holding up in the courts it's all open to enterpretation. Get a couple Judges in there to uphold it and were done.
So ya lets hope it isn't ratified and hope 2/3rds actually have enough sense to say no.

[KFhunter]

Don't forget pending SCOTUS appointments - up to three-  Obama has already appointed two. 

His appointees will have majority rule then.

[csaaphill]

here to get involved or whatever is a link to a site I found
http://www.ammoland.com/2012/11/26/political-left-is-firing-back-with-more-lies-about-the-arms-trade-treaty/#axzz2Djne6S5J
theres a link to tell your senators to appose this.
WHile searching for articles on this I seen a lot of articles that say no fear it's not a gun confiscation I found this site. Registration is the first move never let anyone tell you otherwise. What ever side you fall on the conspiracy theory this is happeneing for a reason of design not random.

[jackmaster]

YEAH RIGHT, they can come for my guns, but they aint taking them while i am still breathing.... most of us have lost family members to war, what the hell would they think if we gave into something as corrupt as the U.N? or sissy lala politicians, matter a fact if they want my guns then i hope they are man enough to lead the charge....