Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: MtnMuley on October 11, 2015, 05:37:42 AMIssuing an additional 1200 doe tags a couple months after the fire without actually having a problem, definately didn't contribute anything positive to "rebuilding the Methow deer herd".This wasn't done to "rebuild" the herd. It was done to prevent a massive die off n the event of a bad winter. It's too late to use this tactic after the fact and a bad winter hits. By the time you can respond, most of the animals are in starvation mode and weakened and the resources are stressed also and won't support a recovery as quickly as an area that hasn't been overgrazed.
Issuing an additional 1200 doe tags a couple months after the fire without actually having a problem, definately didn't contribute anything positive to "rebuilding the Methow deer herd".
But none of that really matters. The results will reveal themselves in due time. And if the Methow takes a disastrous turn, there will be a lot of "I told you sos". If the herd recovers
You're right, we could argue all year and we probably wouldn't see eye to eye. I know nothing about the Methow, That may give you reason to write off my opinion. But I know deer and I pay a lot of attention to management schemes and what works in other places including those I've never been. I have friends who are biologists including the head bio during the moose reduction I mentioned above and I ask a lot of questions and I try not to have preconceived ideas I'm not willing to move from. I also know that the states with the best deer management incorporate a lot of doe hunting in their management plans to keep herds balanced. I've spent over 50 years in the woods of Washington and Alaska and have seen numerous rises and falls of different game populations. But none of that really matters. The results will reveal themselves in due time. And if the Methow takes a disastrous turn, there will be a lot of "I told you sos". If the herd recovers because of the way it's being managed, I doubt I'll be hearing many say, "Well I'll be darned, I was wrong".
One of the major reasons the Methow herd has taken a "disastrous turn" is that the valley is way more populated by people than it has ever been. I have hunted there annually for thirty years. In that time the winter range for mule deer has shrunk in a major way. Every hilltop and hillside that used to be winter range for mule deer now has a house on it. Thousands of acres which used to be covered with migrating mule deer now have no deer on them at all during the winter months. It is a sad sight to see !!!!!
It is a sad sight to see, but you want to hear something ironic. The private property is like a little game reserve. This will really fire up ole Sitka. Those anti hunters might be what is saving any chance the herd might have. That and the fire fighters dropping retardant around all the homes creating pockets of feed. Now, if they'd just control their dogs.
Quote from: boneaddict on October 11, 2015, 07:38:47 PMIt is a sad sight to see, but you want to hear something ironic. The private property is like a little game reserve. This will really fire up ole Sitka. Those anti hunters might be what is saving any chance the herd might have. That and the fire fighters dropping retardant around all the homes creating pockets of feed. Now, if they'd just control their dogs.I guess you lost me there. How do "Those anti hunters" save the mule deer herd in the Methow??
If winter range is lacking, I'd say that's the primary reason for low deer numbers, not WDFW's management. Or in other words- habitat, the most important factor of all.
Quote from: bobcat on October 12, 2015, 08:30:46 AMIf winter range is lacking, I'd say that's the primary reason for low deer numbers, not WDFW's management. Or in other words- habitat, the most important factor of all.If winter range was lacking you would see it in ate down bitter brush etc. I can hike you through the Methow and show you this has not happened. Three years ago we had areas that always had deer in the winter time and it was void of deer, so it is not the lack of winter range it is the depletion of deer.