Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: logola512c on December 03, 2021, 11:40:56 AMI understand what folks are saying, but I am also dismayed by support of other folks breaking the law, whether we might agree with that law or otherwise. Some folks are apparently ok with people illegally killing wolves. Folks want to ride their e-bikes on land where it isn't allowed because they want to write their own definition of what is a motor. They want to hunt for free on timber company land and tribal land because they used to be able to. They don't want to submit a tooth for WDFW research because well...screw the WDFW. Folks want to carry a firearm in businesses that say no weapons. The list goes on. Continuing the train of thought, why should we feel constrained to a 3-point minimum in mule deer units? Why even follow the season dates, for that matter? And the license and tag fees? Why give that money to the f'ing WDFW??? Take some steps down a slippery slope and there might not be any rules at all. Don't cloud the issue with facts and common sense,this group wants to go to war.murica right?Funny how short the distance is between the ghetto and the double wide
I understand what folks are saying, but I am also dismayed by support of other folks breaking the law, whether we might agree with that law or otherwise. Some folks are apparently ok with people illegally killing wolves. Folks want to ride their e-bikes on land where it isn't allowed because they want to write their own definition of what is a motor. They want to hunt for free on timber company land and tribal land because they used to be able to. They don't want to submit a tooth for WDFW research because well...screw the WDFW. Folks want to carry a firearm in businesses that say no weapons. The list goes on. Continuing the train of thought, why should we feel constrained to a 3-point minimum in mule deer units? Why even follow the season dates, for that matter? And the license and tag fees? Why give that money to the f'ing WDFW??? Take some steps down a slippery slope and there might not be any rules at all.
Quote from: logola512c on December 03, 2021, 11:40:56 AMI understand what folks are saying, but I am also dismayed by support of other folks breaking the law, whether we might agree with that law or otherwise. Some folks are apparently ok with people illegally killing wolves. Folks want to ride their e-bikes on land where it isn't allowed because they want to write their own definition of what is a motor. They want to hunt for free on timber company land and tribal land because they used to be able to. They don't want to submit a tooth for WDFW research because well...screw the WDFW. Folks want to carry a firearm in businesses that say no weapons. The list goes on. Continuing the train of thought, why should we feel constrained to a 3-point minimum in mule deer units? Why even follow the season dates, for that matter? And the license and tag fees? Why give that money to the f'ing WDFW??? Take some steps down a slippery slope and there might not be any rules at all. When citizens are ignored, blamed, defamed, and financially hurt without remedy you will see abandonment of the law. While we dont have to accept this lawbreaking, acknowledgement isnt approval. The Anti Hunting forces wont treat sportsmen better if/we condemn these actions. they will just use them against us. Make no mistake the "Middle Ground" is sportsmen continually capitulating until our sport is gone, or so reduced that it cannot influence the general public sentiment.
wonder how many elk this will save.. just sayin... i see "estimates" of 16-22 per year per wolf....
Quote from: birddogdad on December 03, 2021, 03:12:46 PMwonder how many elk this will save.. just sayin... i see "estimates" of 16-22 per year per wolf....I've heard that a pack of 10 wolves eats the equivalent of 120 elk per year. Again, I don't disagree with the fact that wolves are/could decimate the ungulates. But the wolves are just being wolves. I disagree with folks condoning others taking action into their own hands that happens to be illegal. That's just not the way organized and civil society is supposed to work. This has been an interesting conversation. I appreciate the various perspectives.
Quote from: logola512c on December 03, 2021, 03:31:43 PMQuote from: birddogdad on December 03, 2021, 03:12:46 PMwonder how many elk this will save.. just sayin... i see "estimates" of 16-22 per year per wolf....I've heard that a pack of 10 wolves eats the equivalent of 120 elk per year. Again, I don't disagree with the fact that wolves are/could decimate the ungulates. But the wolves are just being wolves. I disagree with folks condoning others taking action into their own hands that happens to be illegal. That's just not the way organized and civil society is supposed to work. This has been an interesting conversation. I appreciate the various perspectives. You mean an organized and civil society that lets people loot and burn businesses, injure police and cause millions in damage without repercussion under the guise of "free speech"?
Seattle and many of those who live there are the glowing example of whats wrong with this country. Organized and civil society that it is. Once you folks have seattle squared away, then by all means come back and tackle the right and wrong of wolves.