collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: puget sound lingcod  (Read 61103 times)

Offline xxlx7

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 296
Re: puget sound lingcod
« Reply #60 on: May 03, 2011, 01:13:32 PM »
That slot limit sure does make it tough, it was sad last year, cause we saw quite a few undersize and a couple oversize fish that someone shot and left cause they didn't want to risk it. I've talked to a couple wardens and every single one of them said if your diving and you shoot a fish, don't just float it,  come in and keep it, they wouldn't ticket you because they know you can't measure a fish before you shoot it, now that being said, you better not shoot a 30-40lb fish.... I just look for the fat bodys, once they start getting fat, they are over 26..

Offline h20hunter

  • Trade Count: (+16)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 20872
  • Location: Lake Stevens
Re: puget sound lingcod
« Reply #61 on: May 03, 2011, 01:26:44 PM »
I agree 100% but since it is a judgement call I still don't plan on diving/spearing them. All it takes is one warden to enforce the rule "as written" and I lose my boat/gear/truck or whatever depending on the fine. I'll stick to hook and line for now. Besides, plenty easy to catch once you have a good spot and get the gear and basics down pat.

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10660
Re: puget sound lingcod
« Reply #62 on: May 03, 2011, 01:29:10 PM »
I agree 100% but since it is a judgement call I still don't plan on diving/spearing them. All it takes is one warden to enforce the rule "as written" and I lose my boat/gear/truck or whatever depending on the fine. I'll stick to hook and line for now. Besides, plenty easy to catch once you have a good spot and get the gear and basics down pat.

 :yeah:
Just because one or two or three WDFW Officers won't cite doesn't mean they all won't. There are a couple officers who essentially have a zero tolerance policy when it comes to WDFW violations.
« Last Edit: May 03, 2011, 02:52:19 PM by bigtex »

Offline h20hunter

  • Trade Count: (+16)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 20872
  • Location: Lake Stevens
Re: puget sound lingcod
« Reply #63 on: May 03, 2011, 01:31:00 PM »
Yep, not worth it. However, I do love shoot'n a nice ling. Maybe someday again.

Offline blacktailcrzy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2011
  • Posts: 236
  • Location: kitsap
Re: puget sound lingcod
« Reply #64 on: May 03, 2011, 04:25:36 PM »
just wondering did any one catch a ling over the size limit this weekend

Offline Rob

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 4962
  • Location: Sandpoint ID
Re: puget sound lingcod
« Reply #65 on: May 04, 2011, 08:16:58 AM »
I put tape marks on my speargun that mark the min and max ends of the slot.  I have then used that to eyeball the fish.  Seems to work pretty well. 

Really hard to guess a fish's length to +/- 10 inches when they are all look 25% larger underwater...

I shot 2 large lings in my life and gave it up.  They are the breeders, and they are soft, mushy and wormy anyway.  Not worth it.
_______________________________________
Sit tall in the saddle, hold you head up high.
Keep your eyes fixed on where the trail meets the sky.
Live like you ain’t afraid to die.
Just sit back and enjoy your ride
  - Chris Ledoux

Offline pjb3

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 1234
  • Location: Stanwood
Re: puget sound lingcod
« Reply #66 on: May 04, 2011, 08:23:56 AM »
just wondering did any one catch a ling over the size limit this weekend

Longknife and a friend and I cought about 25 ling Sunday, no oversizers.

Offline lokidog

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 15186
  • Location: Sultan/Wisconsin
Re: puget sound lingcod
« Reply #67 on: May 04, 2011, 10:15:20 AM »
Beautiful morning on the salt.  Dropped the kids off for school and fished for about an hour.  Caught 8 rockfish and three lings, all shorts.  Had seven or eight hits with fight but lost.  Oh well, next time.

Offline pjb3

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 1234
  • Location: Stanwood
Re: puget sound lingcod
« Reply #68 on: May 04, 2011, 03:57:48 PM »
Beautiful morning on the salt.  Dropped the kids off for school and fished for about an hour.  Caught 8 rockfish and three lings, all shorts.  Had seven or eight hits with fight but lost.  Oh well, next time.

Do they have black sea bass in the sound or just the ocean?

Offline GEARHEAD

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 1783
Re: puget sound lingcod
« Reply #69 on: May 04, 2011, 08:09:27 PM »
sorry for the ignorant question, have not got the regs yet. never heard of the depth restriction, is it less than or more than 120ft, praying its under. was gonna try monday. regardless i will read regs, just lazy for the moment.

Offline pjb3

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 1234
  • Location: Stanwood
Re: puget sound lingcod
« Reply #70 on: May 04, 2011, 08:19:46 PM »
sorry for the ignorant question, have not got the regs yet. never heard of the depth restriction, is it less than or more than 120ft, praying its under. was gonna try monday. regardless i will read regs, just lazy for the moment.

Its under 120' to not catch rockfish. I catch my ling in 15' of water anyway so I'm good :IBCOOL:

Offline gasman

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 6377
  • Location: Tacoma,wa
Re: puget sound lingcod
« Reply #71 on: May 04, 2011, 08:40:47 PM »
sorry for the ignorant question, have not got the regs yet. never heard of the depth restriction, is it less than or more than 120ft, praying its under. was gonna try monday. regardless i will read regs, just lazy for the moment.

Its under 120' to not catch rockfish. I catch my ling in 15' of water anyway so I'm good :IBCOOL:

Prove it  ;)
Gasman


It's 5 O'clock somewhere.......

Offline pjb3

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 1234
  • Location: Stanwood
Re: puget sound lingcod
« Reply #72 on: May 04, 2011, 08:42:31 PM »
sorry for the ignorant question, have not got the regs yet. never heard of the depth restriction, is it less than or more than 120ft, praying its under. was gonna try monday. regardless i will read regs, just lazy for the moment.

Its under 120' to not catch rockfish. I catch my ling in 15' of water anyway so I'm good :IBCOOL:

Prove it  ;)

Tides will be good first thing in the AM so I guarantee ling in 15' :chuckle:

Offline dscubame

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 3603
  • Location: Spokane WA
  • 2013 Idaho Elk Hunt
Re: puget sound lingcod
« Reply #73 on: May 04, 2011, 08:44:44 PM »
SCUBA with a spear....a nice way to fish them.  Used to live in Muk on the water with crab an ling just a walk away.
It's a TIKKA thing..., you may not understand.

Eyes in the Woods.   ' '

Offline gasman

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 6377
  • Location: Tacoma,wa
Re: puget sound lingcod
« Reply #74 on: May 04, 2011, 08:46:47 PM »
sorry for the ignorant question, have not got the regs yet. never heard of the depth restriction, is it less than or more than 120ft, praying its under. was gonna try monday. regardless i will read regs, just lazy for the moment.

Its under 120' to not catch rockfish. I catch my ling in 15' of water anyway so I'm good :IBCOOL:

Prove it  ;)

Tides will be good first thing in the AM so I guarantee ling in 15' :chuckle:

Well, I will report back after our trip whether or not you deliver  on your gaurantee 
:chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle:
Gasman


It's 5 O'clock somewhere.......

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Couple crazy Montana bucks by Dan-o
[Today at 02:24:49 PM]


Bobcat Scent Lures on the Westside by BearCreekCookBook
[Today at 02:19:16 PM]


GM 6.6l gas 6 speed vs. 10 speed? by HntnFsh
[Today at 01:13:51 PM]


Pearygin Quality by jstone
[Today at 12:43:02 PM]


My 2025 Wyoming trip by high_hunter
[Today at 12:34:29 PM]


"Any Deer" GMU's - Proof of Sex? by dreadi
[Today at 11:35:48 AM]


What are you cooking? by JDArms1240
[Today at 09:27:53 AM]


2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by Ghost Hunter
[Today at 09:18:08 AM]


2025 Quality Chewuch Tag by Ridgerunner
[Today at 07:58:46 AM]


New scope or not? by outdooraddict
[Today at 06:31:27 AM]


More than one shotgun? by jdb
[Today at 05:08:07 AM]


Fishin' with First-Timers by Martinhunter
[Today at 02:00:43 AM]


What gmu's in sw Washington hold elk? by Cylvertip
[Yesterday at 10:54:05 PM]


Making memories by h2ofowlr
[Yesterday at 10:29:43 PM]


The Mysterious $200,000 by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 07:06:09 PM]


Late Muzzy WT by Jimmy33
[Yesterday at 04:35:34 PM]


East Oak smokers? by treefarmer
[Yesterday at 03:52:44 PM]


2025 elk success thread!! by IdeehoT
[Yesterday at 02:20:40 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal