collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Yakama Nation Sheep Tags  (Read 98531 times)

Offline PlateauNDN

  • Y.A.R. Medicine Man
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 10691
  • Location: God's Country
  • R.I.P. Colockumelk 20130423. Semper Fi!
Re: Yakama Nation Sheep Tags
« Reply #435 on: August 29, 2018, 12:26:15 PM »
Let's see a show of hands of how many would just let the state show up and do what they want, when they want and how they want on your property.

No questions, warnings or explanation.
If you can read thank a teacher, If you can read in English thank a Marine! 
Not as Lean, Just as Mean, Still a Marine!
He who shed blood with me shall forever be my brother!

"Around this camp, there's only one Chief; the rest are Indians!"

"Give me 15 more minutes, I was dreaming of Beavers!"

Offline b0bbyg

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2012
  • Posts: 3049
  • Location: SW Wa
Re: Yakama Nation Sheep Tags
« Reply #436 on: August 29, 2018, 12:33:23 PM »
why should we be the ones to initiate the dialog when we dont have to.

 And there it is in a nutshell!

If neither side is reaching out neither has the moral high ground.   :twocents:

My ignorant outside opinion is 2 sides wanted to hunt sheep and/or sell tags.   Both did.
Would it be great if both sides started from a big picture conservation standpoint before setting limits - sure
Would it be great if everyone worked together and gets everything right the first time - you bet.
But that is not where we are, both sides have some bad apples lets quit trashing entire groups because of that.

Lots of good dialog and questions in this thread, lots more crap that the Mods have to keep warning us about.

So here we are almost no one is happy, what is a good path forward? What can we as a group or individuals do to help cause a better outcome.

I am not a sheep guy so don't understand the biology to give any suggestion other than I think you have to fix the problem from where you are currently at, not by bemoaning the fact we don't like how we got here.

Sorry for the ramble that kind of bounced around.    Thanks to the ones from both sides that kept it civil so far, and to the Mods for letting it stay open and cleaning up where needed.

No on a side note.
From genealogy that a relative did I was told I am 1/16 Cherokee and 1/16 Blackfoot  so that would be 1/8 native American.  So I know this does not give me any full hunting rights but how about just a turkey   :chuckle:  They are less that 1/8 the size of an elk!
In God we trust, all others bring cash.

Do not say, Why were the old days better than these? For it is not wise to ask such questions.
Ecclesiastes 7 10

Offline baker5150

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2012
  • Posts: 3286
  • Groups: Loser's Lounge - Lifetime Member
Re: Yakama Nation Sheep Tags
« Reply #437 on: August 29, 2018, 12:35:45 PM »
We've had successful cooperative management with other states and other groups involving animals but not this state or its agencies.

Does the Tribe have a Sheep biologist of some sort?

 :dunno:

Offline grundy53

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 12854
  • Location: Lake Stevens
  • Learn something new everyday.
    • facebook
Re: Yakama Nation Sheep Tags
« Reply #438 on: August 29, 2018, 12:39:28 PM »
Let's see a show of hands of how many would just let the state show up and do what they want, when they want and how they want on your property.

No questions, warnings or explanation.
First of all. No one is suggesting that. Not even close. So quit building straw men. Second of all. It's not your property. It's ceded land not the reservation.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Molôn Labé
Can you skin Grizz?

The opinions expressed in my posts do not represent those of the forum.

Offline grundy53

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 12854
  • Location: Lake Stevens
  • Learn something new everyday.
    • facebook
Re: Yakama Nation Sheep Tags
« Reply #439 on: August 29, 2018, 12:41:39 PM »


Let's see a show of hands of how many would just let the state show up and do what they want, when they want and how they want on your property.

No questions, warnings or explanation.

After thinking about this some more this is exactly what the Yakamas are doing.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Molôn Labé
Can you skin Grizz?

The opinions expressed in my posts do not represent those of the forum.

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32890
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Yakama Nation Sheep Tags
« Reply #440 on: August 29, 2018, 12:42:50 PM »
why should we be the ones to initiate the dialog when we dont have to.

 And there it is in a nutshell!

If neither side is reaching out neither has the moral high ground.   :twocents:

My ignorant outside opinion is 2 sides wanted to hunt sheep and/or sell tags.   Both did.
Would it be great if both sides started from a big picture conservation standpoint before setting limits - sure
Would it be great if everyone worked together and gets everything right the first time - you bet.
But that is not where we are, both sides have some bad apples lets quit trashing entire groups because of that.

Lots of good dialog and questions in this thread, lots more crap that the Mods have to keep warning us about.

So here we are almost no one is happy, what is a good path forward? What can we as a group or individuals do to help cause a better outcome.

I am not a sheep guy so don't understand the biology to give any suggestion other than I think you have to fix the problem from where you are currently at, not by bemoaning the fact we don't like how we got here.

Sorry for the ramble that kind of bounced around.    Thanks to the ones from both sides that kept it civil so far, and to the Mods for letting it stay open and cleaning up where needed.

No on a side note.
From genealogy that a relative did I was told I am 1/16 Cherokee and 1/16 Blackfoot  so that would be 1/8 native American.  So I know this does not give me any full hunting rights but how about just a turkey   :chuckle:  They are less that 1/8 the size of an elk!

 So your wife has you served with divorce papers and tells you to pack your stuff and get out. You had no idea she was going to do it, and it never occurred to you to ask about such a thing, after all you thought everything was fine.....that's okay in your mind?

 Would it not be better if she explained what she wanted and asked you to work with her? Then if you don't, it's on you.
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline PlateauNDN

  • Y.A.R. Medicine Man
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 10691
  • Location: God's Country
  • R.I.P. Colockumelk 20130423. Semper Fi!
Re: Yakama Nation Sheep Tags
« Reply #441 on: August 29, 2018, 12:43:27 PM »
Baker, yes we have our own bios.

No, it's not our property anymore, but we retained rights on all of our Ceded land and U & A areas.

You are correct, nobody is suggesting that here but do you have the experience and history of the state and how they handle Tribes?
If you can read thank a teacher, If you can read in English thank a Marine! 
Not as Lean, Just as Mean, Still a Marine!
He who shed blood with me shall forever be my brother!

"Around this camp, there's only one Chief; the rest are Indians!"

"Give me 15 more minutes, I was dreaming of Beavers!"

Offline idahohuntr

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 3601
Re: Yakama Nation Sheep Tags
« Reply #442 on: August 29, 2018, 12:44:25 PM »
There it is indeed. Again, when this state decides it has another government to deal with and treats it as such and not the ugly step child then maybe they will get better treatment.

Treat others how you want to be treated, guess the State never heard of that.
Completely agree...I put most blame on the state for less than desirable cooperation.  I've personally witnessed the condescension from wdfw towards tribes on hunting issues...their ignorance is astounding.

This hysteria over 2 additional sheep tags seems ridiculous.  Is harvesting 2 more rams going to imperil the herd?  Combined with the state tags how many rams are we talking per year? It seems more like people are whining that the swakane wont be a trophy unit like it has been...not that the sheep will be on the brink of extinction.
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood..." - TR

Offline baker5150

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2012
  • Posts: 3286
  • Groups: Loser's Lounge - Lifetime Member
Re: Yakama Nation Sheep Tags
« Reply #443 on: August 29, 2018, 12:46:20 PM »
Baker, yes we have our own bios.

No, it's not our property anymore, but we retained rights on all of our Ceded land and U & A areas.

You are correct, nobody is suggesting that here but do you have the experience and history of the state and how they handle Tribes?

Thank You for the response.

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39177
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Yakama Nation Sheep Tags
« Reply #444 on: August 29, 2018, 01:11:30 PM »
I'm also failing to see what the big deal is about these two tags.

My issue with the Yakama tribe is their year round deer and elk seasons with no limit per person. I really couldn't care less about the two sheep tags in the Swakane.

Although I do agree communication between the Yakamas and the WDFW on this issue should happen. It apparently didn't, but oh well. Again, it's only two tags. That many rams, or more, likely are killed by cars on the highway each year.

Offline Rainier10

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 15935
  • Location: Over the edge
Re: Yakama Nation Sheep Tags
« Reply #445 on: August 29, 2018, 01:17:00 PM »
So my frustration level was pretty high over the swakane deal but now I am hearing that there is no discussion between the tribes and WDFW on sheep at all.  So I would say my frustration level is just as high it is now just spread out over the no communication at all part of this and the fact that with no communication the tribe has decided to have two tags in Swakane.  Yes communication about the new tags would have been great but if nobody has been talking to each other about current GMU's that have native and non native tags being given out why would anyone think that there would be communication about Swakane having both user groups having tags and what number of tags were being given out.

Hopefully my 15% cost to hunt increase will go towards a box of donuts and a gallon of coffee for the WDFW and tribes to sit down and have a discussion.
Pain is temporary, achieving the goal is worth it.

I didn't say it would be easy, I said it would be worth it.

Every father should remember that one day his children will follow his example instead of his advice.


The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of HuntWa or the site owner.

Offline Rainier10

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 15935
  • Location: Over the edge
Re: Yakama Nation Sheep Tags
« Reply #446 on: August 29, 2018, 01:25:21 PM »
Page 88 of the hunting regulations.

The number of settlers was increasing in
Washington by the mid-1800s At that time
the United States government negotiated
treaties with Washington Indian tribes for
the peaceful settlement of the territory
The treaties established reservations for
the exclusive use of the tribes In addition,
the treaty tribes kept their right to hunt,
fish, and gather on lands off of the
reservations All treaties contain similar
language reserving the right to hunt, fish,
and conduct other traditional activities on
lands off of the reservations: “The right of
taking fish, at all usual accustomed grounds
and stations, if further secured to said
Indians in common with the citizens of the
territory…together with the privilege of
hunting…on open and unclaimed lands ”
Treaties are formal contracts between
nations Treaty rights belong to tribes
They are not the property of any individual
tribal member Only tribal members may
exercise treaty hunting rights Members of
one tribe cannot exercise the treaty rights of
another tribe Treaty tribes in Washington
establish hunting regulations through their
own government process Federal and
state courts have ruled that public land is
“open and unclaimed” unless it is being
put to a use that is inconsistent with tribal
hunting Private property is not considered
to be “open and unclaimed,” but it must be
obvious that someone owns the property
There are 24 tribes that have off-reservation
hunting rights within Washington State
There are also many tribes in Washington
that do not have treaties or rights to
hunt off of their reservations Both tribal
and state-licensed hunters hunt game
animals across the state It is important
that Washington Department of Fish
and Wildlife and tribes work together to
manage wildlife
This can be complicated
because tribal ceremonial and subsistence
hunting and state recreational hunting are
based on different cultural heritages and
legal frameworks
Many tribal governments take an active role
in the management of wildlife resources
Most tribes with off-reservation hunting
rights develop their own regulations and
management strategies In recent years,
WDFW and various tribes have worked
together to develop management plans for
wildlife populations and to re-build game
populations
For more information about
tribal hunting, please see the Department
website at: wdfw wa gov/hunting/tribal.


Interesting and sounds good but I am not sure how much working together to manage game is really going on.
Pain is temporary, achieving the goal is worth it.

I didn't say it would be easy, I said it would be worth it.

Every father should remember that one day his children will follow his example instead of his advice.


The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of HuntWa or the site owner.

Offline trophyhunt

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 19529
  • Location: Wetside
  • Groups: Wa Wild Sheep Life Member
Re: Yakama Nation Sheep Tags
« Reply #447 on: August 29, 2018, 02:11:33 PM »
I’m sure Wdfw would have loved to sit down and talk about these important 2 tags, if they had a clue as to what was going to happen.  It’s ridiculous that they were not involved.
“In common with”..... not so much!!

Offline b0bbyg

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2012
  • Posts: 3049
  • Location: SW Wa
Re: Yakama Nation Sheep Tags
« Reply #448 on: August 29, 2018, 02:20:04 PM »
why should we be the ones to initiate the dialog when we dont have to.

 And there it is in a nutshell!

If neither side is reaching out neither has the moral high ground.   :twocents:

My ignorant outside opinion is 2 sides wanted to hunt sheep and/or sell tags.   Both did.
Would it be great if both sides started from a big picture conservation standpoint before setting limits - sure
Would it be great if everyone worked together and gets everything right the first time - you bet.
But that is not where we are, both sides have some bad apples lets quit trashing entire groups because of that.

Lots of good dialog and questions in this thread, lots more crap that the Mods have to keep warning us about.

So here we are almost no one is happy, what is a good path forward? What can we as a group or individuals do to help cause a better outcome.

I am not a sheep guy so don't understand the biology to give any suggestion other than I think you have to fix the problem from where you are currently at, not by bemoaning the fact we don't like how we got here.

Sorry for the ramble that kind of bounced around.    Thanks to the ones from both sides that kept it civil so far, and to the Mods for letting it stay open and cleaning up where needed.

No on a side note.
From genealogy that a relative did I was told I am 1/16 Cherokee and 1/16 Blackfoot  so that would be 1/8 native American.  So I know this does not give me any full hunting rights but how about just a turkey   :chuckle:  They are less that 1/8 the size of an elk!

 So your wife has you served with divorce papers and tells you to pack your stuff and get out. You had no idea she was going to do it, and it never occurred to you to ask about such a thing, after all you thought everything was fine.....that's okay in your mind?

 Would it not be better if she explained what she wanted and asked you to work with her? Then if you don't, it's on you.

Yes it would be better if there was a discussion before action is taken, That is what I thought I said.
I also agree if one group reaches out and is ignored then the blame falls more on the group who did not want to work together.
I just don't feel like there is any evidence either side reached out and we should not pin the blame on just one party in this case.

From what I understand ( mostly from the discussion in this thread )  Non-tribal hunters with a proper tag can hunt the area/herd in question and a tribal member who holds a proper tag can also legally hunt the area/herd. Neither group ever went to the other and said hey guys there is one group of sheep living over on that hill, how many tags is reasonable to make available?

If there is any species goat/sheep/Moose that 2 groups have legal ability to harvest then both groups should work together. Just because one sets a limit first does not make their decision better.  I think both management groups have failed in not reaching out to the other often enough.

I am not defending the way these 2 tags were decided upon, just saying they are not more in the wrong than the WDFW.
Both groups could be do better. 
In God we trust, all others bring cash.

Do not say, Why were the old days better than these? For it is not wise to ask such questions.
Ecclesiastes 7 10

Offline jackelope

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+29)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50142
  • Location: Duvall, WA
  • Groups: jackelope
Re: Yakama Nation Sheep Tags
« Reply #449 on: August 29, 2018, 02:27:30 PM »
There it is indeed. Again, when this state decides it has another government to deal with and treats it as such and not the ugly step child then maybe they will get better treatment.

Treat others how you want to be treated, guess the State never heard of that.
Completely agree...I put most blame on the state for less than desirable cooperation.  I've personally witnessed the condescension from wdfw towards tribes on hunting issues...their ignorance is astounding.

This hysteria over 2 additional sheep tags seems ridiculous.  Is harvesting 2 more rams going to imperil the herd?  Combined with the state tags how many rams are we talking per year? It seems more like people are whining that the swakane wont be a trophy unit like it has been...not that the sheep will be on the brink of extinction.

How many sheep are in the Swakane unit?

How many rams can the herd handle losing per year?

You seem to think you know what you're talking about. Throw down the data that makes you believe the herd can handle 5 tags and 5 rams killed annually for the next few years.

Rather than continuing to say what you think the angle is that everyone else is working, lets hear your data that makes you believe there is nothing to worry about. Show us that the herd will be fine.


:fire.:

" In today's instant gratification society, more and more pressure revolves around success and the measurement of one's prowess as a hunter by inches on a score chart or field photos produced on social media. Don't fall into the trap. Hunting is-and always will be- about the hunt, the adventure, the views, and time spent with close friends and family. " Ryan Hatfield

My posts, opinions and statements do not represent those of this forum

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

1oz cannon balls by fishngamereaper
[Today at 02:52:54 PM]


Knight ridge runner by Irish_hunter93
[Today at 02:29:13 PM]


Search underway for three missing people after boat sinks near Mukilteo by Platensek-po
[Today at 01:59:06 PM]


Desert Sheds by MADMAX
[Today at 11:25:33 AM]


Nevada Results by cem3434
[Today at 11:18:49 AM]


Last year putting in… by JimmyHoffa
[Today at 11:07:02 AM]


Oregon spring bear by pianoman9701
[Today at 09:54:52 AM]


Best/Preferred Scouting App by follow maggie
[Today at 09:08:20 AM]


Anybody breeding meat rabbit? by HighlandLofts
[Today at 08:25:26 AM]


Sportsman’s Muzzloader Selection by VickGar
[Yesterday at 09:20:43 PM]


Vantage Bridge by jackelope
[Yesterday at 08:03:05 PM]


wyoming pronghorn draw by 87Ford
[Yesterday at 07:35:40 PM]


Wyoming elk who's in? by go4steelhd
[Yesterday at 03:25:16 PM]


New to ML-Optics help by Threewolves
[Yesterday at 02:55:25 PM]


Survey in ? by metlhead
[Yesterday at 01:42:41 PM]


F250 or Silverado 2500? by 7mmfan
[Yesterday at 01:39:14 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal