collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Quality elk tag numbers  (Read 15835 times)

Offline Skyvalhunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 16013
  • Location: Sky valley/Methow
Re: Quality elk tag numbers
« Reply #75 on: May 21, 2020, 11:48:25 AM »
They will have to end Quality permits soon and all become Bull permits
The only man who never makes a mistake, is the man who never does anything!!
The further one goes into the wilderness, the greater the attraction of its lonely freedom.

Offline WSU

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 5529
Re: Quality elk tag numbers
« Reply #76 on: May 21, 2020, 11:50:45 AM »
I bet it goes the other way. Soon we’ll have super quality, quality, semi-quality, bull, etc.

Offline Skyvalhunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 16013
  • Location: Sky valley/Methow
Re: Quality elk tag numbers
« Reply #77 on: May 21, 2020, 11:53:03 AM »
Problem is theres no quality or quantity
The only man who never makes a mistake, is the man who never does anything!!
The further one goes into the wilderness, the greater the attraction of its lonely freedom.

Offline WSU

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 5529
Re: Quality elk tag numbers
« Reply #78 on: May 21, 2020, 11:53:57 AM »
Doesn’t matter. More categories = more money.

Offline Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 13147
  • Location: Arlington
Re: Quality elk tag numbers
« Reply #79 on: May 21, 2020, 11:58:40 AM »
Problem is theres no quality or quantity

There must be more quality, the cost is higher than the bull category.   :chuckle:

Offline fishngamereaper

  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 8815
  • Location: CDA/CQ
Re: Quality elk tag numbers
« Reply #80 on: May 21, 2020, 12:02:26 PM »
Problem is theres no quality or quantity

Guess it depends on what your gauge is.

I think calling in 10-12 bulls a day in that 280-300 class with a couple being 320-330 or a little better is a quality day.

I guess my experiences and knowledge of some of the herds is different than other peoples.  :twocents:

For those few people that draw its going to be a heck of hunt.
« Last Edit: May 21, 2020, 12:14:19 PM by fishngamereaper »

Offline buglebrush

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 1615
Re: Quality elk tag numbers
« Reply #81 on: May 21, 2020, 12:22:17 PM »
I don't apply for Elk in Washington.   It gives me the freedom to buy whichever elk tag fills the cracks between Idaho, Wyoming, Colorado, New Mexico, etc...  Way better states to play the draw game in. 

If they ever limit people to one draw category per year I'll be back in. 

Offline Bowhunter3

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2018
  • Posts: 728
  • Location: Skagit
Re: Quality elk tag numbers
« Reply #82 on: May 21, 2020, 12:33:18 PM »
Doesn’t matter. More categories = more money.

They gotta pay for that new gillnetting boat somehow  :dunno:

Offline TriggerMike

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2014
  • Posts: 2227
  • Location: Central WA
Re: Quality elk tag numbers
« Reply #83 on: May 21, 2020, 12:36:49 PM »
Is there anyway out of this hole that we're in now? Even 5-10 years ago it was exponentially better in WA. They keep citing low calf recruitment for the last 3-4 years as the culprit, what is causing the calf recruitment to be so low?

Offline Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 13147
  • Location: Arlington
Re: Quality elk tag numbers
« Reply #84 on: May 21, 2020, 12:45:18 PM »
Is there anyway out of this hole that we're in now? Even 5-10 years ago it was exponentially better in WA. They keep citing low calf recruitment for the last 3-4 years as the culprit, what is causing the calf recruitment to be so low?

Good questions, many of us would like to see WDFW address that.

Offline cb1989

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Aug 2018
  • Posts: 82
Re: Quality elk tag numbers
« Reply #85 on: May 21, 2020, 01:03:29 PM »
Is there anyway out of this hole that we're in now? Even 5-10 years ago it was exponentially better in WA. They keep citing low calf recruitment for the last 3-4 years as the culprit, what is causing the calf recruitment to be so low?

Similar to asking why are salmon numbers down. There's 500 reasons why and everybody has their favorite. Some guys will even tell you calf recruitment isn't down, but that's almost always based on personal observation which tends to be localized and is about like making conclusions about the whole world from the top of a tree.

Offline Rainier10

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 16179
  • Location: Over the edge
Re: Quality elk tag numbers
« Reply #86 on: May 22, 2020, 10:31:47 AM »
Is there anyway out of this hole that we're in now? Even 5-10 years ago it was exponentially better in WA. They keep citing low calf recruitment for the last 3-4 years as the culprit, what is causing the calf recruitment to be so low?
I feel like bears, cats and coyotes put a dent in calf recruitment but I also feel like I would see way more small bones if  10-20 calves were getting eaten in my area.  I don't see a huge number of bones or carcasses so that makes me a little skeptical that they are getting eaten.  Maybe when they are that small the predators eat bones and all.  :dunno:
Pain is temporary, achieving the goal is worth it.

I didn't say it would be easy, I said it would be worth it.

Every father should remember that one day his children will follow his example instead of his advice.


The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of HuntWa or the site owner.

Offline Bango skank

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2014
  • Posts: 5880
  • Location: colville
Re: Quality elk tag numbers
« Reply #87 on: May 22, 2020, 10:50:04 AM »
Is there anyway out of this hole that we're in now? Even 5-10 years ago it was exponentially better in WA. They keep citing low calf recruitment for the last 3-4 years as the culprit, what is causing the calf recruitment to be so low?
I feel like bears, cats and coyotes put a dent in calf recruitment but I also feel like I would see way more small bones if  10-20 calves were getting eaten in my area.  I don't see a huge number of bones or carcasses so that makes me a little skeptical that they are getting eaten.  Maybe when they are that small the predators eat bones and all.  :dunno:

Cats eat most bones even from full grown deer

Offline Rainier10

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 16179
  • Location: Over the edge
Re: Quality elk tag numbers
« Reply #88 on: May 22, 2020, 11:22:06 AM »
Is there anyway out of this hole that we're in now? Even 5-10 years ago it was exponentially better in WA. They keep citing low calf recruitment for the last 3-4 years as the culprit, what is causing the calf recruitment to be so low?
I feel like bears, cats and coyotes put a dent in calf recruitment but I also feel like I would see way more small bones if  10-20 calves were getting eaten in my area.  I don't see a huge number of bones or carcasses so that makes me a little skeptical that they are getting eaten.  Maybe when they are that small the predators eat bones and all.  :dunno:

Cats eat most bones even from full grown deer
:tup: That would make sense.
Pain is temporary, achieving the goal is worth it.

I didn't say it would be easy, I said it would be worth it.

Every father should remember that one day his children will follow his example instead of his advice.


The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of HuntWa or the site owner.

Offline Mr Mykiss

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 1833
Re: Quality elk tag numbers
« Reply #89 on: May 28, 2020, 05:38:57 PM »
How about “juvenile bull” tags like they do for sheep?
It is hard to follow one great vision in a world of darkness and of many changing shadows. Among these shadows men get lost.
-Black Elk

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Another Mushroom we need ID on by Trapper John
[Today at 06:42:25 PM]


Mushroom ID by Trapper John
[Today at 06:28:00 PM]


Blood trailing in the rain by Feathernfurr
[Today at 06:01:14 PM]


Mt. St. Helens Goat by Caseknife
[Today at 05:42:25 PM]


Skagit Question by lovetogrouse
[Today at 05:40:00 PM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by Shrimper
[Today at 04:14:10 PM]


Blue mountains deer permit by teanawayslayer
[Today at 02:53:47 PM]


Getting the hang of hanging on to mallards! by JBG
[Today at 09:33:34 AM]


A legend passed :( by Machias
[Today at 09:26:39 AM]


Flynn’s 1st rooster!!! by C-Money
[Today at 09:02:23 AM]


GMU 368 Nasty Creek Rd Access (Gate) by stickflngr
[Today at 08:45:51 AM]


Chinook run by buglebuster
[Today at 08:39:03 AM]


2025 elk success thread!! by buglebuster
[Today at 08:31:55 AM]


King of the mountain caught sleeping by TeacherMan
[Today at 08:22:47 AM]


GM 6.6l gas 6 speed vs. 10 speed? by HntnFsh
[Today at 07:11:37 AM]


Anyone own a Hewescraft Sportsman 160? by FlyFish360
[Today at 06:48:21 AM]


How much do you think my truck is worth? by FlyFish360
[Today at 02:06:54 AM]


Bullet performance 2025? by Rigby416
[Today at 12:28:20 AM]


SPIKE??? by pashok23
[Yesterday at 10:24:51 PM]


Manulife (Hancock) Land Closures by MMCCAULEY
[Yesterday at 08:25:39 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal